Channel
@SookhteJet
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
59,246subscribers
-64 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001008635530 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SookhteJet |
| Description | اینجا برای کسانیست که تصمیم گرفتند رویاهایشان را با قدرتِ جِت فتح کنند و تاریخساز شوند... «به صورت روزانه سوخت جت دریافت میکنید» - اینستاگرام : instagram.com/SookhteJet.ir |
| Created | 26 September 2015 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 5 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SookhteJet |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:53 | 59,246 | -12 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:41 | 59,258 | -19 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:33 | 59,277 | -5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 59,282 | -6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:26 | 59,288 | -13 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 59,301 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:21 | 59,305 | -5 |
| 5 Aug 2026, 18:40 | 59,310 | first reading |
13,161 posts held, back to 26 September 2015 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 732 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13,161 (26 September 2015 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 73,450 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 19:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
تکنیک ذهنی FBI برای نفوذ به اراده دیگران🧠👮🏻 🎁 کاملا رایگان فقط برای ۵۰۰۰ نفر 💯 کریس واس توی این آموزش بهت یاد میده: ✅ چطور مقاومت طرف مقابل رو بشکنی؟ ✅ چطور بدون بحث و فشار، آدمها رو با خودت همراه کنی؟ ✅ چطور کاری کنی طرف مقابل راحتتر با پیشنهادت موافقت کنه؟ این آموزش بخشی از اشتراک توربو 🚀 ❌ ظرفیت عضویت محدوده ❌ فقط یکبار در سال ثبتنام باز میشه! دریافت از لینک زیر👇 https://la.sookhtejet.com/chris-voss
تا حالا شده بدونی حق با توئه، اما هرچی توضیح میدی باز طرف مقابل میگه: «نه»؟! 😤 ⁉️ چرا بعضی آدما با چند جمله ساده میتونن نظر بقیه رو تغییر بدن، در حالی که تو هرچی بیشتر توضیح میدی، بیشتر مقاومت میکنن؟ امروز قراره راز این مهارت رو از کسی یاد بگیری که بهش لقب «جادوگر» دادن… 🪄👇
️🔐چطور مقاومت آدمها رو در چند دقیقه بشکنیم؟! کریس واس، استاد دانشگاه هاروارد و نابغه ای که ۲۴ سال رئیس FBI و توی تیم مذاکره کننده آمریکا بوده و با تکنیکهاش، حتی آدم های جانی و گروگانگیر رو متقاعد میکرده توی ۲۰ دقیقه اسلحههاشون رو زمین بذارن و خودشون رو تسلیم و اعتراف کنن... 🗣️✌️ 💢 اما راز این متقاعدسازی چیه و چطور میتونی بدون زور، بحث یا التماس، آدمها رو با خودت همراه کنی؟ پست بعدی رو خودت ببین! 👇👇👇
📌 نوتیفیکیشنهای کانال رو روشن کنید که جا نمونید
یه محتوای فوق ویژه فردا صبح قراره به صورت محدود رایگان بشه 🔥🔥🔥
🙅🏻♂️ تکنیک «نه» گفتن قاطعانه، بدون عذاب وجدان! جفرسون فیشر، وکیل آمریکایی و نویسنده کتاب گفتگو بعدی ، یه تکنیک کاربردی برای دفاع از مرزهات بدون پرخاشگری یا خودخواهی آموزش میده✌️ 💯 یاد میگیری چطور نه بگی، بدون اینکه مجبور باشی برای تصمیم خودت مدام توضیح بدی یا از ناراحت شدن بقیه بترسی این آموزش بخشی از اشتراک توربو 🚀 ❌ ظرفیت محدود ❌ فقط یکبار در سال ظرفیت باز میشه! دریافت آموزش و ثبتنام از طریق لینک زیر👇 http…
❌ چرا «نه» گفتن برای بعضیا از انجام دادن صدتا کار سختتره؟ اینکه چطور بدون دعوا، خودخواهی یا خراب کردن رابطهها، قاطعانه «نه» بگی و از تصمیماتت دفاع کنی یه مهارته !✌️🔥 💢 اما چطور میشه بدون احساس گناه، دیگران رو ناامید کرد و همچنان محترم موند؟ توی پست بعدی تکنیکش رو یادت میدیم👇👇👇
Posted without readable text
تو فقط باید تلاشت رو بکنی و خواستههات رو با جسارت به خدا نشون بدی اینکه اون چه تصمیمی برای تو داره رو نمیتونی بدونی فقط باید به زمانبندیش اعتماد کنی و به این باور داشته باشی که هر کسی که لایقه به اون چیزی که باید برسه میرسه! ایمانت رو حفظ کن! ❤️ @sookhtejet
ویدیوی نادر از جو دیپسنزا 🎥✨ فرمول تصویرسازی و قانون جذب واقعی به روش JP 🔮 اگه میخواید قانون جذب واقعی و دقیق رو خیلی ساده و واضح و به دقیقترین شیوه یاد بگیرید فقط کافیه این ویدیو رو ببینید! ✅ بالا بردن حداکثری فرکانس جذب خواستهها ✅ ۳۳ برابر کردن قدرت قانون جذب ✅ فعالسازی ارتعاش قلب و شهود درونی دریافت آموزش و ثبتنام از طریق لینک زیر👇 https://sookhtejet.com/turbo 🔗
اگه میخواید بدونید قانون جذب واقعی چطور کار میکنه حتما این ویدیو رو ببینید!
اصلا میدونستی؟🤔 طبق قوانین متافیزیک، همه ما اطراف بدنمون یک میدان کوانتومی داریم که دارای یک فرکانس خاص هست و مشابه فرکانس خودش رو جذب و وارد زندگی ما میکنه؟!✨ عجیبتر اینکه...🧐 این «قلب»❤️ هست که فرکانس اصلی رو ارسال میکنه و عامل تمام جذبهای زندگیت قلبته نه مغز!🧠❌ چون قدرت مغناطیس قلب ۵۰۰۰ برابر بیشتر از مغز هست!⚡️
Showing the 12 most recent of 13,161 posts we hold for @SookhteJet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,050,875 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@SookhteJet named 9 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“پروژه سوختِ جت 🚀” (@SookhteJet), 59,246 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SookhteJet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.