Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
38 measurements spanning 68 days, net -1,014. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 39,296–40,614 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 38
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Oct 2026, 15:58
39,448
-45
13 Oct 2026, 08:39
39,493
-95
9 Oct 2026, 02:59
39,588
-65
4 Oct 2026, 15:15
39,653
-9
26 Sept 2026, 12:57
39,662
-130
19 Sept 2026, 14:36
39,792
-47
17 Sept 2026, 03:01
39,839
-42
15 Sept 2026, 01:00
39,881
-24
13 Sept 2026, 08:18
39,905
-48
11 Sept 2026, 08:20
39,953
-73
8 Sept 2026, 10:01
40,026
-20
5 Sept 2026, 05:01
40,046
-21
3 Sept 2026, 07:48
40,067
-23
2 Sept 2026, 00:54
40,090
-8
1 Sept 2026, 04:29
40,098
-3
31 Aug 2026, 07:52
40,101
-10
30 Aug 2026, 09:35
40,111
-16
29 Aug 2026, 09:14
40,127
-10
28 Aug 2026, 08:12
40,137
-15
27 Aug 2026, 06:17
40,152
first reading
Engagement
28 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 130 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.6%
avg views ÷ 39,448 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,760
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.42%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 28 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 October 2026
Posts held
28 (31 July 2026 – 12 October 2026)
Views total
69,060
Reactions total
978
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Oct 2026, 16:34 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,710
Videos
≈2,800
Links
≈580
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
23m 13s
Average length
56s
Measured directly from 25 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,166 reactions across 28 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
1,304
60.2%
❤
407
18.8%
😱
86
3.97%
👍
77
3.55%
👏
56
2.59%
❤🔥
41
1.89%
👀
38
1.75%
🙈
33
1.52%
😍
24
1.11%
🤩
23
1.06%
🥰
18
0.831%
🤗
10
0.462%
🦄
5
0.231%
🍓
4
0.185%
🏆
4
0.185%
🗿
4
0.185%
💘
3
0.139%
💯
3
0.139%
🙊
3
0.139%
🍌
2
0.092%
13 further kinds
21
0.97%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,166 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 12 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 28 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dr_kondratev. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 28 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 12 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
❗️РЕДУКЦИОННАЯ МАММОПЛАСТИКА БЕЗ ИМПЛАНТОВ ❗️
Большая грудь доставляет сильный дискомфорт. Большинство девушек мечтают уменьшить ее, так как из-за тяжести болит спина, возникают трудности с подбором белья.
Иногда у меня спрашивают «а какие трудности с подбором белья могут быть?»
Например - обхват под грудью небольшой, а чашка большая. Стандартные размеры белья в таком случае не подходят 😔
На разметке пациентка оче…
❗️ЛИПОСАКЦИЯ 360+ НИЖНИЙ БОДИЛИФТ + ЛИПОФИЛИНГ ЯГОДИЦ❗️
Массивное похудение никогда не проходит бесследно )
Наша героиня похудела на 70 кг без уколов и бариатрии. Вы только представьте ! Спорт и правильное питание 🤩
Естественно, фартук после похудения никуда не ушел. Полностью повисла кожа. Наше преображение мы начали с живота и ягодиц.
Наша пациентка счастлива и довольна уже на протяжении 5 месяцев ❤️
Для записи…
❗️ПОСЛЕРОДОВОЙ КОМПЛЕКС❗️
Прекрасный результат комплексной операции : редукционная маммопластика ( в нашем стиле без имплантов, но в результате получается как-будто с имплантами 🔥) + липосакция 360+ абдоминопластика с ушиванием диастаза и пластикой пупочной грыжи🤍
Девушка стройная. После двух родов грудь начала провисать вместе с животом. Обратите внимание на пупок до и после. Идеальна ложбинка после удаления грыжи…
❗️ГИГАНТОМАСТИЯ ❗️
10 размер груди доставлял дискомфорт нашей прекрасной пациентке 😔 возникали трудности в подборе нижнего белья, неудобства при занятиях спортом
Сейчас все изменилось ❤️ мы уменьшили грудь с 10 до 3 размера
Для записи на консультацию пишите в Telegram: https://t.me/kondratevclinic
#гигантомастия
#редукционнаямаммопластика
#безимплантов
#подтяжкагруди
❗️ПРЕОБРАЖЕНИЕ ВИКИ❗️
Дорогие друзья, вы уже знакомы с нашей красоткой Викой, которой почти год назад мы выполнили фейслифтинг со SMAS-лифтингом и платизмопластикой, лобно-височный лифтинг, верхнюю блефаропластику и брахиопластику ❤️
https://t.me/dr_kondratev/4990
https://t.me/dr_kondratev/4289
Сейчас Вика вернулась к нам уже с другой целью - довести до идеала предыдущие результаты ( бодилифт, феморопластику, мамм…
Ровно полгода после повторной маммопластики с заменой имплантов, с устранением bottoming out, со сменой плоскости установки имплантов с поджелезистой на субмускулярную на Moscow Breast Meeting 2026 ❤️🔥
Как вам результат ?🫰🏻
Для записи на консультацию пишите в Telegram: https://t.me/kondratevclinic
#пластическийхирург
#повторнаямаммопластика
#заменаимплантов
❗️ПОВТОРНАЯ МАММОПЛАСТИКА С ЗАМЕНОЙ ИМПЛАНТОВ❗️
Нашей героине 58 лет 🫰🏻
20 лет назад пациентке выполнили якорную подтяжку груди и поставили импланты в другой клинике.
При извлечении старого импланта, который стоял 20 лет, мы обнаружили застарелый разрыв. Весь гель вытек, а имплант пожелтел. Удалили имплант вместе с капсулой.
Мы выполнили повторную маммопластику с заменой имплантов. Удалили «километр» лишней кожи …
❗️РУБРИКА «ВОПРОС-ОТВЕТ»❗️
Дорогие друзья, сейчас мы выполняем липомоделирование
Готов ответить на любой ваш вопрос во время операции. Задавайте в комментариях под этим видео, а мы в формате видео будем вам отвечать 🫰🏻
#пластическийхирург
❗️КАПСУЛЯРНАЯ КОНТРАКТУРА❗️
Сегодня мы выполнили повторную маммопластику с заменой имплантов.
Первичную операцию пациентке выполнили 10 лет назад в другой клинике. Поставили импланты «Allergan» , объемом 490 мл через подмышечные впадины.
У пациентки образовалась капсулярнся контрактура в обеих мж. На видео слышно, как при разрезе «хрустит» капсула. Имплантат все это время находился в сжатом состоянии
Для записи н…
❗️13 РАЗМЕР ГРУДИ❗️
На днях мы выполнили редукцию гигантомастии молодой девочке и удалили 3400 гр лишних тканей !!❤️🔥
Эта операция была мечтой нашей пациентки. С 12 лет у девушки начала расти грудь, а к 18 годам достигла 13 размера. Я думаю, что вы сами понимаете какую ношу ей пришлось носить до 26 лет !
С правой груди мы удалили 1881 гр, а с левой 1500 гр ❤️🔥
Для записи на консультацию пишите в Telegram: https…
❗️ПОДТЯЖКА ГРУДИ БЕЗ ИМПЛАНТОВ❗️
Но выглядит, как имплантами ❤️
Дорогие друзья, у нас прошло 2 месяца после операции. Рубцы на таком сроке имеют красноватый оттенок, но не стоит пугаться, к году они посветлеют 🫰🏻
Для записи на консультацию пишите в Telegram: https://t.me/kondratevclinic
#пластическийхирург
#подтяжкагруди
#безимплантов
❤59🔥50😍5🤩3❤🔥2🍓2👍2🤗2
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @dr_kondratev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
GINEKOLOGIYA AYOLLAR SALOMATLIGI @GinekologiyaEstetika · 847 (as read 19 September 2026)#75
Mr.Nadzor Технадзор, Приемка и Ремонт @mrnadzor · 25,177#76
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ПЛАСТИЧЕСКИЙ ХИРУРГ, Седышев Самир @doctor_samir · 23,016 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 19 September 2026
Пластический хирург Вардан Хачатрян @drvardanmd · 26,513 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 19 September 2026
#ФИСЕЧНАЯПЕЯ @dr_kodzoeva_lm · 18,744 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 5 October 2026
Мем в глаз попал @memineye · 19,858 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 29 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Пластический хирург @dr_kondratev” (@dr_kondratev), 39,448 subscribers as measured 14 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dr_kondratev.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.