Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Dr. Abramian

Channel

Dr. Abramian

@dr_abramian

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

60,118subscribers

-75 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001607760114
TypeChannel
Username@dr_abramian
DescriptionПластический хирург Др. Абрамян Запись на консультацию по ссылке ⤵️ ⤵️ ⤵️ https://forms.amocrm.ru/rdctrlv?utm_source=Telegram По всем вопросам пишите: +79101110411
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dr_abramian

Growth

60,10160,19460,147.57 August 2026 — 60,193 subscribers7 August 2026 — 60,193 subscribers8 August 2026 — 60,194 subscribers9 August 2026 — 60,191 subscribers10 August 2026 — 60,190 subscribers11 August 2026 — 60,181 subscribers12 August 2026 — 60,118 subscribers13 August 2026 — 60,105 subscribers14 August 2026 — 60,101 subscribers16 August 2026 — 60,129 subscribers17 August 2026 — 60,118 subscribers60,1187 August 202617 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 10 days, net -75. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 60,087–60,208 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 16:5960,118-11
16 Aug 2026, 09:0560,129+28
14 Aug 2026, 20:4860,101-4
13 Aug 2026, 10:1760,105-13
12 Aug 2026, 07:1560,118-63
11 Aug 2026, 06:4160,181-9
10 Aug 2026, 03:5360,190-1
9 Aug 2026, 04:1160,191-3
8 Aug 2026, 04:1860,194+1
7 Aug 2026, 11:1560,193no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:0960,193first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 17 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.8%
avg views ÷ 60,118 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,470
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.55%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held9 (17 July 202615 August 2026)
Views total28,420
Reactions total440
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Aug 2026, 11:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
449
Videos
995
Links
56

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 57s
Average length
44s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

973 reactions across 5 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥42143.3%
38539.6%
😱949.66%
👍333.39%
👏80.822%
😍70.719%
🥰60.617%
💋50.514%
🙏40.411%
🤯40.411%
❤‍🔥30.308%
👌30.308%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 973reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 5 we hold a reading for · 60%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dr_abramian. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 July 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 12:42 UTC≈5,260 views127 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Комплексное омоложение лица👇🏻 Елене 44, хорошее лицо, выглядит на свои года, умеренный птоз, есть избытки кожи лица , физиологическая асимметрия(справа веко и бровь больше подвисают) Желанием Елены было придать лицу свежий и молодой вид. Я выполнил:фейслифтинг, эндоскопический лобно-височный лифтинг, верхняя классическая блефаропластика. Статистика 🔥 👉🏻Избытки мышц лица и шеи : SMAS - 8 см, Platysma - 8 см 👉🏻

🔥9430❤‍🔥3

11 Aug 2026, 09:38 UTC≈8,260 views134 reactions1 Starread 18 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

105🔥21💋5👌3

28 Jul 2026, 06:21 UTC≈14,900 views179 reactions2 Starsread 18 August 2026
Photo

«Я перестала нравиться себе в зеркале…» ❤️‍🩹 Анна, 47 лет, приехала ко мне из Испании 🇪🇸 В душе - 25. Но отражение в зеркале совсем не радовало. Основные жалобы: — выраженная дряблость тканей — отечность лица — потеря четкого овала — усталый взгляд Как и многие женщины, Анна долго пыталась решить проблему косметологией: ▫️ филлеры ▫️ Radiesse в латеральной зоне ▫️ нити ▫️ аппаратные процедуры Но в какой-то момент

110🔥57😍7🥰5

18 Jul 2026, 13:05 UTC≈13,300 views339 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

ПОХУДЕЛА НА 20 КГ 😍 Прекрасной Анне 51 год, и за последнее время она совершила невероятную трансформацию - похудела на 20 килограммов! 👏 Но после значительного снижения веса ткани лица потеряли чёткие контуры, появились выраженные возрастные изменения и ощущение усталости во внешности. Статистика 🔥 👉🏻Избытки мышц лица и шеи : SMAS - 9 см, Platysma - 8 см 👉🏻Избытки кожи лица и шеи : Шея - 1

🔥23574👍21👏8🥰1

17 Jul 2026, 15:43 UTC≈12,300 views194 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026
Photo

НИТИ в СМАС ❗️ Во время сегодняшней операции мы столкнулись с очередным примером того, почему нитевой лифтинг далеко не всегда дает тот результат, которого ожидают пациенты.📌 Практически все лицо было пронизано нитями. Они находились на разных уровнях🙌🏽 ❓Почему это проблема? Со временем нити могут вызывать выраженный фиброз. Потом они теряют свою естественную подвижность, а выполнение полноценной подтяжки лица ст

😱9466🔥14👍12🤯4🙏4

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @dr_abramian. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Пластический хирург Николаева Сандара Афанасьевна
@drNikolaevaSandara · 89,786
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Dr. Abramian” (@dr_abramian), 60,118 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dr_abramian.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.