Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Птица-Похуица

Channel

Птица-Похуица

@ptitsapokhuitsa

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

27,622subscribers

-78 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001508473524
TypeChannel
Username@ptitsapokhuitsa
DescriptionОтрицательный персонаж 🎭 Для связи @ptitsa_pokhuitsa
Created4 October 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ptitsapokhuitsa

Growth

27,62227,70027,6616 August 2026 — 27,700 subscribers7 August 2026 — 27,695 subscribers8 August 2026 — 27,690 subscribers9 August 2026 — 27,684 subscribers10 August 2026 — 27,668 subscribers11 August 2026 — 27,664 subscribers12 August 2026 — 27,658 subscribers13 August 2026 — 27,657 subscribers14 August 2026 — 27,651 subscribers15 August 2026 — 27,640 subscribers16 August 2026 — 27,635 subscribers17 August 2026 — 27,622 subscribers6 August 202617 August 2026
12 measurements spanning 11 days, net -78. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,610–27,712 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 20:2727,622-13
16 Aug 2026, 22:2427,635-5
15 Aug 2026, 17:5927,640-11
14 Aug 2026, 09:5427,651-6
13 Aug 2026, 03:1527,657-1
12 Aug 2026, 05:0327,658-6
11 Aug 2026, 04:5527,664-4
10 Aug 2026, 06:0627,668-16
9 Aug 2026, 04:1127,684-6
8 Aug 2026, 06:1127,690-5
7 Aug 2026, 05:3527,695-5
6 Aug 2026, 09:4927,700first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.1%
avg views ÷ 27,622 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,670
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.57%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026
Posts held20 (5 July 202616 August 2026)
Views total86,670
Reactions total3,095
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Aug 2026, 01:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,680
Videos
52
Links
101

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
15s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,815 reactions across 20 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣1,78637.1%
😁1,22725.5%
💯1,16824.3%
4068.43%
🤝420.872%
🔥370.768%
❤‍🔥320.665%
310.644%
🤡300.623%
👍290.602%
🤔100.208%
👀60.125%
🌚30.062%
👌30.062%
🤨30.062%
😈20.042%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,815reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ptitsapokhuitsa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 July 2026 to 16 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

16 Aug 2026, 11:47 UTC≈2,590 views237 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Дорогой, ну конечно, я могу решить всё сама, но давай тогда будем просто подругами

💯147😁57❤‍🔥27👍6

16 Aug 2026, 08:19 UTC≈3,110 views292 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Если я выиграю в лотерею, люди вокруг меня больше не будут бедными. Я серьёзно. Я перееду в богатый район.

😁146🤣106💯27👍5👌3🤨32

8 Aug 2026, 19:13 UTC≈6,480 views166 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Пожалуйста 🤌

😁14323

4 Aug 2026, 07:32 UTC≈8,400 views337 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Мужчины так часто говорят «посмотрим», что женщины вынуждены были освоить таро, для некоторой ясности ситуации

🤣262💯54🔥192

3 Aug 2026, 10:42 UTC≈7,090 views266 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Forwarded from @retrogradnaya_ptichka

Совет дня для всех знаков зодиака: запомните, что никакие йоги, пилатесы, фитнесы не заменят вам простой человеческой драки.

🤣16947💯40👍5😁41

3 Aug 2026, 10:19 UTC≈6,650 views242 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Мой любимый - ром, изюм, орех

107😁76💯53🤝6

2 Aug 2026, 11:27 UTC≈6,680 views256 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Я: у меня депрессия Члены моей семьи:

😁115🤣94💯28🔥95❤‍🔥5

31 Jul 2026, 06:31 UTC≈6,470 views30 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Женщина взяла кредит на 300 тысяч и слила всё на приворот. Все ржут, хотя очередь к «потомственным колдуньям в седьмом поколении» в этом году, кажется, длиннее, чем к бензоколонкам. Из тех, к кому в этой теме не стыдно направить — Мара Чармер. Она практик без венцов безбрачия за пять платежей. Если видит, что человеку нужен психотерапевт, а не приворот, то так и говорит.

🤡13😁64🌚3🔥3💯1

31 Jul 2026, 04:44 UTC≈7,180 views223 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Сначала ты молод, а потом тебе плохо, если спал мало, и плохо, если спал много

💯156😁5611

21 Jul 2026, 20:55 UTC≈8,830 views409 reactionsread 18 August 2026

А вы тоже ждали лета, чтобы появились силы на жизнь, а в итоге оказалось, что у вас нет сил вне зависимости от сезона?

💯30447😁3214👀6🤔6

21 Jul 2026, 09:48 UTC≈9,300 views358 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

привет всем, кроме Гриши

🤣277😁54💯1512

20 Jul 2026, 11:15 UTC≈7,310 views24 reactionsread 18 August 2026

🤩 Какой женщине ДАЮТ? Дают подарки, букеты, оплачивают отпуск… и это еще помимо дани, которую оставляют нижние. Даже и просить и намекать не надо! 💰💍 Мужчины сами дарят и получают от этого орг*зм! Вот реальный кейс: одной из девушек, с канала Той самой Госпожи, — мужчина скинул 6000€ за то, что не смог встретить ее в аэропорту! Могла бы она сказать: «Да все нормально, не переживай?» Могла, но она знает свою ценн

🤡175👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ptitsapokhuitsa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 181,122 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Стикерач
@stikery_emodzi_memy · 1,255,768
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 8 August 2026
Смс из будущего
@sms_future · 108,585
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 14 August 2026
Любовник Голубев
@lovergolubev · 114,971
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Птица-Похуица” (@ptitsapokhuitsa), 27,622 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ptitsapokhuitsa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.