5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,651–2,657 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 11:14
2,652
-4
10 Aug 2026, 00:41
2,656
+1
6 Aug 2026, 23:28
2,655
-1
6 Aug 2026, 05:19
2,656
no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:03
2,656
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
25.7%
avg views ÷ 2,652 subscribers
Avg views / post
681
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.92%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
20 (21 July 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
11,578
Reactions total
454
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 16:18 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
424 reactions across 16 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
87
20.5%
❤🔥
80
18.9%
custom 5416132628464020245
58
13.7%
custom 5192739340605750165
41
9.67%
🤯
38
8.96%
❤
37
8.73%
custom 5449698107119904829
28
6.60%
👍
12
2.83%
😱
11
2.59%
custom 5454112830989025752
10
2.36%
custom 5235708482652487613
7
1.65%
✍
4
0.943%
custom 5361787350705788144
2
0.472%
custom 5415783915774289448
2
0.472%
👏
2
0.472%
💘
2
0.472%
🥰
2
0.472%
🙊
1
0.236%
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 454reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
желание писать китайскими значками на родном языке часто порождает у китайцев практические трудности
китайская письменность создавалась не для живой разговорной речи. на протяжении почти 2️⃣ тысяч лет иероглифы использовались исключительно для записи классического литературного языка
когда носитель "локального" китайского сталкивается с необходимостью всё ж таки писать на усвоенном с молоком матери, все средства о…
еженедельно – лучшие объявления поднебесной в рубрике #translation_server_error 😃
в прошлую среду была замечена сочная вывеска из чаочжоу ↘️
сыфу тяньсянь го дянь
死父甜鲜果店
фруктовая лавка «мёртвые дочери отцы»
в чём же секрет бездыханных папаш?..
для начала стоит вспомнить, что в районе чаошань – даром, что это вполне себе гуандун, традиционная юэская зона – говорят на чаочжоуском (тьёчиувэ 潮州话), разновидности юж…
с какой скоростью печатали в докомпьютерную эру китайских машинок?..
💘
напомню: спецназовцы от мира машинописи умудрялись шарашить по 60 знаков в минуту (хотя базовая скорость моталась где-то в районе 20)
*️⃣ для сравнения: на механической печатной машинке рекорд скорости долгое время составлял 176 слов в минуту, на электрической – 216. если перевести слова в знаки (при среднем английском слове в 5 букв), это даёт…
перечитываю классическую работу про историю китайских печатных машинок 🫡
интересно, что после конца гражданки машинки использовалась активнее, чем когда-либо прежде, – в госучреждениях, университетах, на предприятиях. культовая машинка марки «пара голубков» (шуангэ 双鸽) со стильным бледно-зелёным корпусом стала символом эпохи. поразительно, но машинописные отчёты 1956–1957 годов создавались даже в откровенной тьмута…
каждое воскресенье мы угадываем тут одно диалектное слово – и не теряем здравого смысла и самообладания!
сегодня наш донор вновь и опять – дунганские диалекты 🤩
*️⃣кто такие дунгане?
потомки китайцев-мусульман, бежавшие на русь в современные кыргызстан и казахстан после подавления антиманьчжурского восстания на северо-западе китая в 1862-1877 годах. дунгане говорят на китайском северного типа, но с 1950-х пишут кир…
меж тем, как всегда по средам, мы расчехляем китайские объявления!
всё самое вкусное – из района чаошань ↘️
сыфу тяньсянь го дянь
死父甜鲜果店
магазинчик сладких свэжих фруктов «мёртвый отец»
тяньтянь ю тэцзя
天天有特价
скидки каждый день
ну ещё бы 😃
но что за лев этот тигр гений нейминга работал над этой вывеской?..
через неделю встретимся с объяснениями на том же месте 🍉
#translation_server_error
прочитала интересное про тангутское письмо 💡
для тех, кто в домике ↘️
тангуты (миняги) – это такой тибето-бирманский народ, который построил небольшую но уютную империю к северо-западу от китайской империи сун и потом чжурчжэньской цзинь на территории современных провинций шэньси и ганьсу. к 11 веку тангуты поняли, что им срочно нужна письменность
по приказу императора тоба (aka ли) юаньхао 拓跋元昊 в 1036–1037 годах …
ещё чуток про такой способ писать по-китайски некитайскими буквами, как гоюй ломацзы 国語羅馬字 ↘️
несмотря на то, что систему разрабатывали и полировали в середине 1920-х самые выдающиеся лингвисты своего времени – чжао юаньжэнь 赵元任, ли цзиньси 黎锦熙, линь юйтан 林语堂, у массовой публики она не вызывала энтузиазма плак-плак
в 1928 году китай принял её в качестве официального транскрипционного стандарта для всех словарей; …
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
😱8🔥2👍1🤯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @diversemajority. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 48,706 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“китайский арбуз 🍉” (@diversemajority), 2,652 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/diversemajority.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
