Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Языковая школа «Линдао»

@lingdao_school

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

151subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002088265662
TypeChannel
Username@lingdao_school
DescriptionУчите китайский вместе с нами! ❤️ Узнать о курсах и ценах: @lindao_manager
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/lingdao_school

Growth

1517 Aug 2026, 21:52 — 151 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 19:46 — 151 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 21:528 Aug 2026, 19:46
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 150–152 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 19:46151no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:52151first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 23 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
38.7%
avg views ÷ 151 subscribers
Avg views / post
58.5
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.86%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held19 (23 June 20264 August 2026)
Views total585
Reactions total46
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 19:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
281
Videos
71
Links
65

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
3m 51s
Average length
1m 17s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

96 reactions across 19 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6264.6%
👍2222.9%
🔥99.38%
🤣33.13%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 96reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC33 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

5👍1🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC33 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

我觉得 wǒ juéde Мне кажется; 我认为 wǒ rènwéi Я считаю; 在我看来 在我看来 zài wǒ kàn lái С моей точки зрения; 依我看 依我看 yīwǒkàn на мой взгляд, по-моему; А вы что думаете? 😊

4👍1🔥1

2 Aug 2026, 16:57 UTC41 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @chinabewithyouVideo

я стабильно плохо отношусь и к китайской мультипликации, и к китайскому кино. но когда я вижу что-то действительно хорошее — я готов об этом громко кричать. вот кричу. пару лет назад в китае вышел сборник “странных историй из поднебесной" / 中国奇谭 — и демон-хрюндель из первой серии со своими друзьями моментально запал в сердечко миллионам зрителей. и вот сняли полнометражный мультфильм «маленькие демоны путешествуют

6

1 Aug 2026, 06:26 UTC51 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @diversemajorityPhoto

подготовка к лекции идёт полным ходом 🍉 #наши_пальчики_устали

👍1

24 Jul 2026, 15:05 UTC90 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

✍Для всех учеников, кто планирует сдавать HSK: С 2026 года система HSK переходит на новый формат HSK 3.0. Главное изменение — экзамен становится более комплексным: теперь оценивается не только знание слов и грамматики, но и способность использовать китайский язык в реальных коммуникативных ситуациях. Больше слов: HSK 1 — 500 HSK 2 — 1272 HSK 3 — 2245 HSK 4 — 3245 HSK 5 — 4316 HSK 6 — 5456 HSK 7–9 — до 11 092 слов В

4👍2

23 Jul 2026, 16:15 UTC75 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Открыт набор в группу для начинающих: 🧑‍🏫 очно - понедельник в 18:00 - четверг в 19:00 🧑‍🏫 очно - понедельник в 18:00 - суббота в 11:00 👩‍💻онлайн - понедельник в 10:00 - четверг в 10:00 📍Занимаемся по адресу: 1-я Дубровская ул., 4а (м. Пролетарская) Записаться можно у нашего администратора. Ждем вас!

3👍1🔥1

23 Jul 2026, 15:05 UTC70 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Вот как сказать «随便» (suí biàn) по-китайски: Это буквально значит «как удобно» или «мне всё равно». В Китае это очень вежливый способ показать, что вы не хотите создавать неудобство и готовы принять выбор собеседника. Основные варианты перевода на русский: · Без разницы — самый точный аналог · Всё равно — тоже «всё равно» · Как хочешь / Как удобно — «как тебе удобно» · Любой — «любой» (когда выбираешь предмет) При

3👍1🔥1

23 Jul 2026, 15:05 UTC55 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

3👍1🔥1

21 Jul 2026, 18:04 UTC60 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @diversemajorityPhoto

летняя программа по развиртуализации продолжается 😃 решили сделать перепрошивку лекции про кто кого: мы их (иероглифы) или они нас (безвинных юзеров) разговор в основном для тех, кто китайского не знает, но заодно будет и кое-что интересненькое для китаистов 🤫 🔴реально ли читает другое полушарие? 🔴сколько знаков было в арсенале у дедушки мао? 🔴как воспринимали китайское письмо первые фраппированные европейцы? 🔴'по

👍2

16 Jul 2026, 14:06 UTC77 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Мы стали активнее вести Instagram, размещаем там интересные истории🇨🇳✨ Контент с нашим телеграм-каналом почти не пересекается, поэтому подписывайтесь ❤️ 请关注我们! 😊

2👍1

14 Jul 2026, 12:07 UTC78 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Небольшой кусочек с занятия ❤️🇨🇳 Глагол 送 (sòng) «дарить, вручать» может употребляться с двумя дополнениями: кому дарят и что дарят. Есть три основные конструкции: 我送妈妈花 Я дарю маме цветы (нейтральный вариант). 我送给妈妈花 Я дарю (вручаю) маме цветы. Частица 给 подчёркивает передачу подарка получателю. 我送花给妈妈 Я дарю цветы маме. Здесь акцент сделан на том, кому предназначен подарок. Все три варианта правильные, но

3

13 Jul 2026, 13:19 UTC78 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤍Внимание, дорогие ученики!🤍 Сейчас проходит конкурс на лучшее видео о Китае!🇨🇳 От организаторов: · Юньнаньская компания культурного туризма «Юньчжия» / 云南沄之涯文化旅游发展有限公司 · Управление специального фонда «Куньминская благотворительность · Юньчжия» / 昆明慈善·沄之涯中华文化传承专项基金管理办公室 · Комитет специализированных медиа Ассоциации экспертов провинции Юньнань / 云南省专家协会融媒体专业委员会 🤍Краткие условия: Формат: Видео 1-3 минуты на китайск

👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @lingdao_school. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 513,923 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Языковая школа «Линдао»” (@lingdao_school), 151 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lingdao_school.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.