Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for denkende Betrachtung

Channel

denkende Betrachtung

@denkende_betrachtung

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

550subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002391079643
TypeChannel
Username@denkende_betrachtung
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/denkende_betrachtung

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

541550545.56 August 2026 — 543 subscribers6 August 2026 — 543 subscribers12 August 2026 — 542 subscribers20 August 2026 — 541 subscribers27 August 2026 — 543 subscribers2 September 2026 — 542 subscribers10 September 2026 — 547 subscribers19 September 2026 — 550 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 44 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 540–551 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 05:59550+3
10 Sept 2026, 20:19547+5
2 Sept 2026, 07:16542-1
27 Aug 2026, 05:26543+2
20 Aug 2026, 04:02541-1
12 Aug 2026, 22:04542-1
6 Aug 2026, 18:18543no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:54543first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

231 reactions across 20 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤10545.5%
🔥6226.8%
👍187.79%
❤‍🔥125.19%
😁114.76%
🤣83.46%
👏73.03%
👌20.866%
💘20.866%
🥰20.866%
🍾10.433%
😱10.433%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 231 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 March 2026 to 7 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Jul 2026, 15:06 UTC255 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Еще одно видео, прекрасное интервью о логике (и не только) с Иваном Микиртумовым. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2jn28-v_VJU ps Вот канал Ивана Борисовича.

❤6

4 Jul 2026, 12:51 UTC302 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @insolarance

В жизни каждого наступает момент, когда возникает необходимость вернуться к философии Гегеля. В новом выпуске подкаста мы это делаем вместе с Иваном Кудряшовым и Денисом Масловым. Разбираемся, почему у Гегеля нет синтеза, а есть только тезис в снятом виде. Говорим о сознании и самосознании. Наконец, выясняем, кем же был Гегель? Метафизиком? Метафилософом? Или же сложным герменевтическим объектом? https://youtu.be/bW…

❤9❤‍🔥6🔥3

3 Jul 2026, 11:56 UTC267 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @plato_podcast

Привет! Это канал подкаста «Платон болел». Мы не очень верим, что философию можно пересказать. Нам кажется, что самое интересное начинается не тогда, когда кто-то объясняет текст, а когда его читают вместе. Когда есть время остановиться, поспорить, не согласиться, вернуться на страницу назад или, наоборот, уйти далеко в сторону — и неожиданно понять, зачем вообще был нужен этот разговор. Мы — Ольга Алиева и Соня П…

👍6

24 Jun 2026, 09:18 UTC379 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Popular psychology: A person is beautiful and enough just the way they are. John McDowell: "So not just any instance of Homo sapiens is geistig. But that makes no difference to my point. Being a biologically non-defective human being, brought up in a normal human way, is not an achievement."

😁7🥰2

14 Jun 2026, 10:00 UTC498 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zt2yFyqB3N8 Some more Heidegger. This video presents the lovely scenery from the places where Heidegger lived, worked and died. One commentary surprised me: his grave bears a star that allegedly indicates his connection to or even membership of free masonry. #heidegger

❤6

5 Jun 2026, 13:10 UTC615 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Немного о Хайдеггере по мотивам двух конференций (1, 2). Прежде всего Хайдеггер был не просто философом, но философом именно немецкой традиции. Он был анти-реалистом, то есть его Sein, как бы это ни писалось, не относится к внешнему миру, миру без и вне сознания и т.д. Это уже всегда мир интерпретированный, и там есть некоторые интерпретаторы. Это, в конечном счете, по свободу, понимание нас и мира, способы нашего в…

❤16👏1

31 May 2026, 13:20 UTC505 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Итак, новосибирская конференция, в подготовке которой и я принимал скромное участие, посвященная философии Мартина Хайдеггера завершилась. Это было очень большим удовольствием. Мы смогли собрать очень сильную по составу участников конференцию, хотя, к сожалению, специальная секция о Хайдеггере и аналитической философии отменилась. Более всего мне запомнились выступления Алексея Глухова, Инго Фарина и Антона Коха. Ко…

❤14👍2👏1

31 May 2026, 12:56 UTC418 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Пост в поддержку Светланы Месяц. Многие уже слышали, что случилось около двух недель назад. Опуская детали, ситуация такова: сотрудника Института философии, антиковеда Светлану Месяц обвиняют в мошенничестве. Она прекрасный исследователь античной философии. Ни на секунду не сомневаюсь в ее невиновности. Надеемся на благоприятный и справедливый исход. Прилагаю запись ее стрима с Василом про Прокла https://www.youtu…

❤14👍6👏3

26 May 2026, 14:01 UTC579 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Известно, что полное собрание сочинений Мартина Хайдеггера превышает сто томов. Уже поэтому навигация среди всех этих докладов и семинаров весьма затруднительна. Вдвойне так, если нужно работать с англоязычными переводами. К счастью, существенная часть работы уже проделана. Найти полный план (с содержанием отдельных томов и доступными англоязычными переводами) можно по ссылке ниже: https://www.beyng.com/hb/gesamt.ht…

🔥12👍3💘2🍾1😱1

21 May 2026, 12:52 UTC639 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @angwfovPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣8❤5😁3

21 May 2026, 10:30 UTC727 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Наконец готово расписание конференции по Хайдеггеру. Мы смогли собрать лучших хайдеггероведов России, и некоторых ведущих зарубежных философов и хайдеггероведов. (Смогли бы и больше, если бы не пересечение с конгрессом в Месскирхе, но уж как сложилось). Программу конференции можно найти тут, а задать вопросы — на почту оргкомитета [email protected]

🔥12❤8❤‍🔥2👏2

1 May 2026, 10:52 UTC661 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Для метафизики вопрос о том, что является фундаментальным, базовым, подлинно существующим централен и возникает чуть ли не вместе с самой философией или даже раньше, и в разных формах пронизывает практически всю философию: эйдосы и феномены, творец и творение, базис и надстройка и т.д. Сегодня Гоша с Василом будут обсуждать grounding или фундирование в аналитической философии. Присоединяйтесь!

🔥6❤4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @denkende_betrachtung. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Mar 2026, 09:09 UTCAnonymous Poll39 voters

Хотели бы вы принимать постоянное участие в семинаре с обсуждением философских текстов (и идей, преимущественно немецкоязычных философов) на немецком языке?

  1. да, у меня есть философская подготовка и уровень немецкого не ниже С118%
  2. да, у меня есть философская подготовка и уровень немецкого В2 или ниже33%
  3. да, у меня нет философской подготовки, и уровень немецкого не ниже С13%
  4. да, у меня нет философской подготовки и уровень немецкого В2 или ниже10%
  5. я хочу быть просто слушателем36%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 March 2026 to 7 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“denkende Betrachtung” (@denkende_betrachtung), 550 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/denkende_betrachtung.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.