Channel
@delbigtree
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
129subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002349257370 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @delbigtree |
| Description | Host of ‘The HighWire with Del Bigtree’, Producer of Vaxxed, CEO of Informed Consent Action Network, Former Emmy winning producer of The Doctors on CBS. |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/delbigtree |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:30 | 129 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:30 | 129 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (16 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,698 |
| Reactions total | 12 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 01:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 20 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
12 reactions across 5 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 7 | 58.3% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 16.7% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 16.7% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 8.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Within five years, if we do nothing, we will be living in a social prison. Facial recognition everywhere. AI making decisions about the quality of our lives. Vaccines used not to protect health but to design our fertility and our futures on behalf of people who have no right to make those decisions. These are tools in the hands of some of the darkest individuals who have ever walked this earth. I'm not fighting to …
🔥 “On behalf of the millions of people harmed by Anthony Fauci… resoundingly, YES.” It was unbelievable to watch. After Anthony Fauci invoked the Fifth Amendment 111 times under subpoena last week, the Senate Homeland Security Committee met today to vote on holding him in contempt of Congress. But before they could get there, Democrats mounted a fierce defense of Fauci, arguing he had been put in a legal trap and …
🔥2
Twenty-five years of working with RNA taught one medical biochemist three things you should never do with it: modify it, stabilize it, or inject it. The mRNA COVID vaccine did all three, and I asked him to walk me through why that's important. He described RNA as the blueprint of a cell, the instructions it uses to translate into proteins that do the actual work. If that blueprint is modified mid-construction, you d…
🔥3❤2
It doesn't matter if Fauci was right about everything, or that he had the best intentions. He still infringed on people's civil and individual rights, and that's the problem. He crossed the line on gain-of-function research, and he crossed it critically when he took away people's individual freedoms. Whether you see him as a villain or a hero, handing one person that kind of power is dangerous, because the next pers…
🚨Rand Paul's document dump includes Tony Fauci's own diary, and it rewrites the COVID timeline. One month after being warned by Drew Weissman, the Nobel laureate behind the mRNA technology, that the vaccine crosses into the placenta and fetus and triggers an immune response in the amniotic fluid, Fauci greenlit the shot for pregnant women. Roughly 20,000 were vaccinated. The official line: no red flags. "Looks like…
Not one Democratic senator asked Fauci a single question at the hearing. That's the real story. Not what Fauci said or didn't say. It's that half the country still doesn't see anything wrong with letting one man wield the kind of power he did over health decisions for an entire nation. There should be two red lines coming out of it: no gain-of-function research, period. And your rights can't be contingent on the op…
Just over 50 people signed the Declaration of Independence. They put their names on that document and said this is who I am, you know where I live, come and try to take freedom from me. That's what they were saying to everyone who knew them. They would rather die standing than live on their knees. We are celebrating 250 years of that decision this year, and I think one of the most important things to stand for is th…
"There's compassion available for the small child that everyone knows has a disability," Tyler Hudson says. "But what about when he ages out of that and turns into an adult, and now his behaviors can be perceived as threatening?" His son is 18 now. "There's nothing between 18 and 80 for him." He will require significant support for the rest of his life, and Hudson describes that reality as the hardest stage of an ac…
The global governance structure - the authoritarian EU expanding to the WEF, the WHO, the UN - believes it needs to control your bodies, and vaccines are how they intend to do it. They want to decide if you can have children. This is not a conspiracy theory. Bill Gates says we must reduce population. Barack Obama, Klaus Schwab, Tedros - they all say we need to reduce population. And at the same time, every one of t…
Fauci pleaded the Fifth throughout his testimony today. No clarity on what he did, said, agreed to, or funded. Rand Paul raised the question of contempt. And there may be a real legal problem with how Fauci's team handled it: he opened his testimony with a statement about his "decade-long cooperation with Congress," testifying 200 times. "You can't use it as a sword and a shield." Once he opened the door to that to…
Can you count them?? @delbigtree
🔥2
🚨 They say MAHA is losing steam. The numbers tell a different story. A new poll shows nearly one-third of U.S. adults identify with the MAHA movement, while another 20% remain undecided but supportive. That puts a majority of Americans within reach of a movement centered on medical freedom, healthier food, and better health. “This has legs. It has steam. It has momentum.” @delbigtree
👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @delbigtree. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 235,690 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Del Bigtree” (@delbigtree), 129 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/delbigtree.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.