Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Covid-19 Plandemic

@covid

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,452subscribers

-13 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001787801021
TypeChannel
Username@covid
Created11 June 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/covid

Growth

4,4514,4654,4587 August 2026 — 4,465 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,465 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,451 subscribers12 August 2026 — 4,452 subscribers4,4527 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,449–4,467 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 23:344,452+1
10 Aug 2026, 02:414,451-14
7 Aug 2026, 07:304,465no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:184,465first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.8%
avg views ÷ 4,452 subscribers
Avg views / post
836
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026
Posts held20 (4 May 202628 July 2026)
Views total4,178
Reactions total58
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 18:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2h 02m
Average length
6m 48s

Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

177 reactions across 20 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4827.1%
👍3821.5%
💯2313.0%
💩1910.7%
🤬158.47%
🔥105.65%
👀84.52%
🤣31.69%
21.13%
👏21.13%
😢21.13%
🥴21.13%
👎10.565%
😱10.565%
🤮10.565%
🤯10.565%
🥱10.565%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 177reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 May 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Jul 2026, 18:35 UTC635 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

THEY TOLD YOU YOUR IMMUNE SYSTEM WAS JUST WEAK. THEY LIED. A weak immune system is not a genetic flaw. It is a system that has been drained of its cellular energy by chronic, hidden inflammation. When your cellular voltage drops below 20mV, your white blood cells stop patrolling. Your body stops fighting off pathogens. You get sick, and you stay sick. You cannot fix a collapsed immune system with a vitamin pill.

1

27 Jul 2026, 04:57 UTC661 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Dr. Fauci will appear before Congress about COVID-19 on July 29th. The question on everyone's mind: Will he tell the truth and admit his mistakes? Robert Redfield is a Senior Visiting Fellow for Public Health Policy in The Heritage Foundation’s Center for Health and Welfare Policy. @covid 🦠

1

25 Jul 2026, 15:33 UTC762 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @delbigtreeVideo

@RobertFKennedyJr. just announced plans to create a formal COVID-19 vaccine injury table, according to a new filing reported by The Hill. Right now, anyone injured by the shot has to file a claim with no established list of recognized injuries, then build their own medical and scientific case from scratch that the vaccine caused their harm. Out of over 14,000 claims filed, only 62 have been compensated. An injury t

8👀5💯5

15 Jul 2026, 21:38 UTC≈1,080 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🚨 CDC Director Nominee Dr. Erica Schwartz: “I believe mRNA technology is safe and effective” @covid 🦠

💩19👀3🤣2🥴2😢2👎1🤮1

15 Jul 2026, 18:09 UTC≈1,040 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

If you think memory loss is just a normal part of aging...think again. Because new research from Harvard Medical School, there is a disturbing link between Alzheimer’s cases and a toxic mineral that’s hiding in plain sight… Over 70% of the U.S. population ingests this toxic mineral through common foods, drinks, and even products we put on our skin every day… And its devastating effects on our brain health are now

42👍1😱1

3 Jul 2026, 21:28 UTC≈1,140 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @delbigtreeVideo

In Japan, I sat down with a doctor who specializes in gene therapy and practices pediatric oncology. When I asked him why he got involved in questioning the COVID response, he said: "Because my specialty is gene therapy. This is gene therapy. And gene therapy is very difficult." He knew the technology. He works with it on children fighting cancer. He understands what it takes to get it right, and what happens when y

👍4🤯1

3 Jul 2026, 21:16 UTC959 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @delbigtreeVideo

Aaron Siri was asked whether a return to globalist leadership would change the legal landscape for medical freedom. His answer reframed the question entirely. During the four years of the Biden administration, when federal pressure to strip medical rights was at its peak, roughly half the states went hard in the opposite direction. More laws protecting medical liberty passed at the state level than at any point in A

1

25 Jun 2026, 17:15 UTC≈1,330 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

What if useful plants were growing closer than you think?☘️ Many everyday plants have a long history of traditional use and continue to be studied today. After 19 years of research, I created The Natural Healing Handbook - a spiral-bound guide to help you explore over 200 herbs, plants, and natural wellness traditions in a practical, easy-to-use format. Inside, you’ll find: 🌿 232 step-by-step remedies using common i

2

8 Jun 2026, 04:30 UTC≈1,570 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @RonJohnsonVideo

Rasmussen Reports found that 24% of Americans believe they know someone who died from a COVID injection. The FDA was aware of these deaths and adverse events, yet they covered them up and continued to recommend COVID shots. Why won't the legacy media cover this major scandal? @RonJohnson

🤬121🥱1

2 Jun 2026, 04:27 UTC≈1,810 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @delbigtreeVideo

There's a pattern flagged by researchers in Italy (it sounds very familiar to us here in the States), and it has to do with excess mortality during COVID. In Tuscany and other regions of central and southern Italy, excess deaths were higher in 2022 than in 2021, and higher than in 2020 as well. COVID deaths were going down during that same period. Something else was driving the increase. The timing of the mass vacci

3👍2

26 May 2026, 04:56 UTC≈1,520 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @CharlieWardVideo

Court Documents Claim: “COVID Was No Worse Than the Flu” — Debate Continues #COVID19 #CourtDocuments #PublicHealth #FluComparison #HealthDebate #PandemicDiscussion #MedicalNews #FactCheck #CurrentEvents #StayInformed @CharlieWard

👍4👏2

15 May 2026, 21:01 UTC≈1,780 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ChildrensHealthDefenseVideo

Senator @RonJohnson says COVID has awakened people to reexamine the entire childhood vaccine schedule. “Science is all about taking a look at the consensus and poking a hole in it and testing it.” “I think it’s created a necessary and legitimate explosion in vaccine hesitancy.” “Not only just the COVID injection, but everything on the childhood vaccine schedule.” @ChildrensHealthDefense

💯13👍102🤣1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @covid. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 129,046 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Covid-19 Plandemic” (@covid), 4,452 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/covid.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.