26 Jul 2026, 15:43 UTC10 viewsread 11 August 2026
Video
More from the rally against anti-Jew violence, UWS @NaomiWolf
Channel
Naomi Wolf
@NaomiWolf
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
41subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001772462571 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NaomiWolf |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NaomiWolf |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:23 | 41 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 18:46 | 41 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 20 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 24.4%
- avg views ÷ 41 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 10.0
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (20 March 2026 – 26 July 2026) |
| Views total | 10 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 18:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 8m 41s
- Average length
- 1m 05s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
14 Jul 2026, 18:58 UTC14 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @delbigtreeVideo
7 to 2. Monsanto wins. Your food loses. Welcome to the pool. Everyone is in it now. The Supreme Court just ruled 7 to 2 in favor of Monsanto, striking down thousands of Roundup cancer lawsuits worth billions in damages. The ruling grants liability protection to the maker of an herbicide that hundreds of thousands of plaintiffs claim causes cancer. Corporations are now getting the same shield that pharmaceutical com…
20 May 2026, 19:02 UTC22 viewsread 11 August 2026
Video
“What If Humanity Had Changed — Could Mashiach Have Already Come?” @NaomiWolf
20 May 2026, 18:49 UTC21 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo
DailyClout: "The Fall of @RepThomasMassie" "Kentucky’s most famous Republican rebel just got crushed in the most expensive House primary ever — and the controversy surrounding Thomas Massie only got darker from there; full breakdown in the comments." https://dailyclout.io/the-fall-of-thomas-massie/ @NaomiWolf
11 May 2026, 19:16 UTC21 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo
"Nations Clash Over WHO Pandemic Powers" "The WHO pandemic treaty talks have stalled again as nations clash over vaccine access, pathogen sharing, and sovereignty concerns ahead of the next global outbreak — see link in the comments." https://dailyclout.io/nations-clash-over-who-pandemic-powers/ @NaomiWolf
6 May 2026, 19:42 UTC19 viewsread 11 August 2026
Video
"Years before COVID, Ralph Baric collaborator and gain-of-function researcher Eric Donaldson wrote Seventh Extinction: The Genesis Project — a novel about a deadly global pandemic that now feels disturbingly familiar." @NaomiWolf
5 May 2026, 04:50 UTC16 viewsread 11 August 2026
Video
"How COVID was marketed and controlled" @NaomiWolf
4 May 2026, 20:57 UTC13 viewsread 11 August 2026
TWC: "COVID INDUCED TURBO CANCERS AND A PROMISING CANCER TREATMENT" "It is amazing how many of the COVID “conspiracy theories” turn out to be 100% true. The origins of COVID, the efficacy of the vaccine, the failures of the government’s draconian COVID response, the damage schools closing would do to our children, the attacks on Ivermectin and Hyrdoxychloroquine, and the list goes on and on and on." https://dailycl…
1 May 2026, 20:50 UTC17 viewsread 11 August 2026
DailyClout: "Senate Candidate Found Dead In Vehicle" "Senate candidate found dead in remote wildlife area after sudden disappearance, as investigators search for answers." https://dailyclout.io/senate-candidate-found-dead-in-vehicle/ @NaomiWolf
24 Apr 2026, 04:18 UTC19 viewsread 11 August 2026
Video
"Allegations that the SPLC manufactured hate to fundraise" @NaomiWolf
21 Apr 2026, 04:24 UTC14 viewsread 11 August 2026
DailyClout: "China Trade Routes Tied to Iran Weapons Scheme Uncovered" "A U.S. arrest and a seized cargo ship are exposing what officials say may be a global Iran-linked supply network—with China now emerging as a key piece of the puzzle." https://dailyclout.io/china-trade-routes-tied-to-iran-weapons-scheme-uncovered/ @NaomiWolf
20 Apr 2026, 19:36 UTC12 viewsread 11 August 2026
DailyClout: "FBI director says arrests are coming related to 2016 Russia probe" "FBI Director Kash Patel says arrests tied to the Trump–Russia investigation could be imminent, signaling a potentially explosive new chapter in one of the most controversial probes in modern U.S. history." https://dailyclout.io/fbi-director-says-arrests-are-coming-related-to-2016-russia-probe/ @NaomiWolf
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @NaomiWolf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 748,308 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Naomi Wolf” (@NaomiWolf), 41 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NaomiWolf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.