Posted without readable text
🔥6

Channel
@decodinghuman
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,519subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001262167716 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @decodinghuman |
| Description | Маркетинг, брендинг, создание нематериальных ценностей и продажа смыслов. Телеграм-канал Романа Пустовойта, главного стратега стратегического агентства Human Code (humancode.ru). Рекламы на канале нет, по вопросам пишите @r_pustovoit |
| Created | 29 September 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/decodinghuman |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:25 | 4,519 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:26 | 4,524 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:02 | 4,525 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:37 | 4,525 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (10 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,318 |
| Reactions total | 133 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 07:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
165 reactions across 15 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 98.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 162 | 98.2% | |
| 💩 | 3 | 1.82% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 165reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @decodinghuman. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Posted without readable text
🔥6
Синдром отложенной жизни — страшная штука, особенно для малого предпринимателя в современных российских реалиях. Нормально само не будет никогда, так что важно эту нормальность создавать самому. Поэтому решил ради разнообразия попробовать отпуск. Раньше тоже было но как-то коротко или функционально, или даже бессмысленно — так один отпуск провёл увлекательно болея ковидом. Получилось дольше чем планировал и опыт та…
🔥26
Posted without readable text
🔥9💩1
Новости с фестиваля Основа такие. Приходите в жюри, подавайтесь, надеюсь, что сделаем категорию Исследования и Аналитика ещё глубже, обширнее и интереснее. Ну и компания приятная.
🔥6
Posted without readable text
🔥12
Posted without readable text
🔥9
Код внимания Неделю назад был на конференции Код Человечности от Родной Речи, было достаточно интересно и содержательно. Особо интересно было исследование внимания от айтрекингового сервиса Битт. Это панель с исследованием того, как смотрят ТВ не только посредством опроса, но и посредством камеры наблюдения. Вывод в целом очевиден — по большей части реклама не создает внимание, а наследует его. При этом, самый пер…
🔥5
Posted without readable text
🔥14
Posted without readable text
🔥7
Суперпозиция процесса и результата Процесс часто ставится в оппозицию результату. Мол, есть процессники, есть результатники. Одним подавай правила, и если они этим правилам следуют, то нечего спрашивать за резльтат, если его нет — значит правила не те. Другие говорят — вот вам результат, какая разница, как мы его добились, совершенно не важно сколько стратегических приоритетов, партнерских отношений и прочих мышкин…
🔥7
39 Недавно я понял, почему есть традиция не праздновать 40 лет. Подходя к такому рубежу, человеку важно побыть с собой, понять, что ему или ей действительно нравится и в чем истинные желания. Это время, когда человек-для-общества уже многое попробовал, и думает о том, как стать человеком-для-себя разной степени осознанности. Серьезные люди заходят мотоциклы, кабриолеты, юных любовниц или другие экзотические хобби,…
🔥29
Следующие 500 лет. Кристофер Мейсон. О чем книга Автор задает сразу глобальный вопрос ребром: жизнь на Земле конечна. И виноват не Трамп, не ядерное оружие, а то, что Солнце через 4 миллиарда лет закончится. И соответственно если мы раньше не придумаем, как нам уйти с родной планеты и заселить галактику, а то и Вселенную, то мы умрем, а вместе с нами и вся остальная жизнь, кроме какие-нибудь тихоходок на космических…
🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @decodinghuman. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 187,474 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Decoding Human — Роман Пустовойт” (@decodinghuman), 4,519 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/decodinghuman.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.