Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Смерть на все случаи жизни

@death_for_all

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

610subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001584323553
TypeChannel
Username@death_for_all
Created26 September 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/death_for_all

Growth

6086106096 Aug 2026, 21:32 — 608 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 05:41 — 610 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 21:327 Aug 2026, 05:41
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 608–610 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 05:41610+2
6 Aug 2026, 21:32608first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 19 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.1%
avg views ÷ 610 subscribers
Avg views / post
129
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
14.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held13 (19 April 20264 August 2026)
Views total258
Reactions total36
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 21:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

122 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8065.6%
🔥1613.1%
👍108.20%
❤‍🔥86.56%
👏32.46%
🙏32.46%
😁10.82%
😢10.82%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 122reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 19 April 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 10:13 UTC77 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Работа "Уктусской школы" Валерий Дьяченко, цикл "Кладбища" 1968 г. Бумага, карандаш, цифровая копия

👍84👏2

16 Jul 2026, 07:03 UTC181 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026

// напротив моего рабочего стола висит стикер с надписью "сосредоточься на хорошем" // Эти полгода сильно прошлись по мне, многие планы были сильно пододвинуты вперед. Только в июне я смогла глубоко выдохнуть и продумывать, а что еще хочется сделать до конца этого года. И вот в этот период я повесила такой стикер, а еще "Пусть в каждом дне найдется что-то тёплое". Где-то я увидела задание дня "Каждый день хотя бы р

15🔥4🙏3

11 Jul 2026, 09:28 UTC168 viewsread 6 August 2026

В "Штуках" подвели результаты опен-колла "Завещание". Мне очень понравился этот текст

11 Jul 2026, 09:28 UTC207 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @flash_shtuki

Я хочу, чтобы хоронили одну мою ногу (левую), одну руку (правую), где захотят. Все остальное сжечь. Долго хранить прах, пока полеты в космос не станут по цене вафельницы, или микроволновки. Туда запустить больше всего праха. Со мной в гроб прошу положить голографическую картину с Иисусом, как он создает планету в космосе, ту картину, что стоит у меня на кухне. Потом сжечь грейпфрут, крабовые палочки, тыквенные семеч

❤‍🔥8👍1😁1

25 May 2026, 05:45 UTC304 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @deathdoulaPhoto

В 2024 году обанкротилась компания-производитель роботов Moxie. Их покупали детям, в том числе с аутизмом, для общения, социализации и обучения. В прощальном письме клиентам компания сообщила, что постепенно все роботы отключатся, и приложила инструкцию, как рассказать об этом детям соответственно их возрасту. Многие владельцы отреагировали на ситуацию очень эмоционально. Дети горевали по роботу, который успел стать

4

22 May 2026, 07:25 UTC289 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

// Американский композитор продолжает писать музыку после смерти // В 1965 году композитор Элвин Люсье стал первым артистом, использовавшим мозговые волны для создания живого звука в своей основополагающей работе "Музыка для сольного исполнителя". Давние поклонники его творчества, команда "Оживление" начала обсуждать с ним идеи ещё в 2018 году. Но только в 2020 году, когда композитору было 89 лет, и он страдал от бо

5

12 May 2026, 16:23 UTC238 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Вчера испытала любопытный для себя опыт — ходила на медиацию по Михайловскому кладбищу. Тому самому, где похоронены туристы из группы Дятлова, а еще, к моему удивлению, фотограф Вениамин Метенков (хотя, как выяснила позже, это кенотаф). Мы много говорили о современных видах захоронения, о том, что нам симпатизирует на кладбище, а что нет, как появились памятники в форме пирамидки, какие мы знаем приметы и ритуалы и

🔥91👏1

10 May 2026, 15:26 UTC244 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @deathdoulaPhoto

Самая обсуждаемая новость Голливуда в апреле – воскрешение Вэла Килмера для фильма «Глубоко, как в могиле». Создатели фильма использовали искусственный интеллект для воссоздания актера, что вызвало волну противоречивых дискуссий. Но это не первый случай, когда ИИ воскрешает знаменитостей. ИИ-аватар Оззи Осборна показался на концерте Рода Стюарта вместе с другими давно умершими рок-звездами. Речь Чарли Кирка, сгенери

10🔥2

7 May 2026, 17:40 UTC244 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Сегодня 25 лет, как не стало поэта Бориса Рыжего. Я стояла на кухне, отмывала кастрюлю от ржавчины и думала о том, что в этот день, ровно четверть века назад человек принял решение завершить свою жизнь. Такое обыденное действие, как мытьё посуды, спустило меня к земле и к поиску философских ответов. Около года назад, когда я перешагнула возраст Бориса (ему на момент смерти было 26 лет), вдруг осознала, что это такой

13

23 Apr 2026, 16:36 UTC334 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Хотя чат-gpt — всезнающий, у людей есть очень классное качество — мы можем чего-то не знать. Не знать, но быть рядом, чувствовать и слушать 🤍

13

20 Apr 2026, 16:49 UTC516 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

//сегодня хочу поделиться с вами уникальной игрой// 💐"Этот дракон, рак" (That Dragon, Cancer) (2016 год) – игра, разработанная супругами Райаном и Эми Грин по мотивам их семейной трагедии. В годовалом возрасте у их сына Джоэла диагностировали рак, врачи дали ему несколько месяцев, но он прожил до четырех лет. Память о нем родители решили увековечить в игре. Прохождение игры занимает всего несколько часов, а игровых

15👍1🔥1😢1

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @death_for_all. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 813,537 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Смерть на все случаи жизни” (@death_for_all), 610 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/death_for_all.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.