Channel
@doulaoflife
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
155subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001808770956 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @doulaoflife |
| Description | Канал психолога и доулы смерти https://knyazeva-psy.taplink.ws Запись на консультации — @veronika_kpsy https://akpn.org/members/kniazeva-veronika-stanislavovna-612 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/doulaoflife |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:45 | 155 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 155 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 7 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (7 May 2026 – 25 July 2026) |
| Views total | 181 |
| Reactions total | 14 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 18:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
48 reactions across 11 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 30 | 62.5% | |
| 💔 | 8 | 16.7% | |
| 😁 | 6 | 12.5% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 4.17% | |
| 🤗 | 1 | 2.08% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 2.08% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 7 May 2026 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
25 июля — Всемирный день ВРТ (вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий). День, который для многих связан не просто с медициной, а с очень личной историей надежды, ожидания и пути к родительству. Сегодняшняя дата неслучайна: именно в этот день родилась Луиза Браун — первая из детей, зачатых с помощью ЭКО. Автор этого канала защищала ВРТ ещё задолго до того, как профессия и жизнь связали меня с этим тремя буквами (ист…
❤4
Раз уж сегодня 24/07, пусть здесь будет немного про сексологию, ну и про потери, куда же без них. На днях (бес)славно завершил свой земной путь наш домашний жезловый вибратор типа «ванд». Ванды, или, в переводе, «волшебные палочки» лично я как человек и консультант по сексуальным отношениям, считаю одним из лучших изобретений человечества. В хозяйстве это вещь крайне полезная: помимо улучшения непосредственно качеств…
💔8😢2
На конференции про пркдвосхищающее горе и горевание по живым рассказала, а с вами поделиться забыла. В эту субботу встреча группы
Группа поддержки для тех, кто проживает утрату Приглашаем на встречу, где можно быть с тем, что есть: с болью, растерянностью, злостью, пустотой или тишиной. Здесь можно просто прийти и разделить свой опыт с другими. Мы работаем с утратами любой давности — недавними и теми, что произошли давно, но продолжают откликаться внутри. Также можно приходить с предвосхищающим горем — когда физическая утрата еще не произошла…
Забота начинается с безопасности. Часть 2 6) Сенсоры падения (отдельные устройства) Отдельные персональные сенсоры/браслеты, которые фиксируют резкое падение и отправляют сигнал. Почему: при падении важна мгновенная реакция, особенно если человек не может позвать на помощь. На что смотреть: точность обнаружения падения, длительность работы батареи, возможность привязки к экстренным контактам. Варианты. продающиеся в…
❤3
Забота начинается с безопасности. Часть1 Этот пост, точнее,серия постов, так как всё в один не уместилось, будет полезен в первую очередь семьям, где есть пожилые люди. Всё, что написано ниже, актуально для квартиры человека с деменцией, но когнитивное снижение - скорее вопросы времени, а не Если случится". Поэтому предлагаю ориентироваться на "когда, а не если". Эти меры также актуальны для семей с маленькими деть…
❤3
Читала недавно отзывы/рецензии на фильм «Тысячу раз спокойной ночи». Удивлена, что фильм прошел мимо меня, ведь тема ещё с универа горячо любимая и актуальная (только по счастливой случайности в свое время не пошла на военмед факультет). И конфликт в жизни гг тоже знаком. Для себя я все же выбрала «мирную жизнь»(хотя насколько работа в российской медицине может быт названа далекой от военных действий — тоже вопрос ди…
❤8
Автора немного размазало по городу из-за всяких внеплановлстей по здоровью, поэтому полезный контент запаздывает. Настроение такое:
❗️Пухососов срочно выпустили на улицы Москвы Аллергики, помощь идёт
🥰1😁1
Приглашаем в открытую группу поддержки для тех, кто переживает утрату. Это безопасное пространство, где можно говорить или молчать, плакать или просто слушать. Где не осудят и не будут давать непрошеных советов. Как это работает? ☕️Это открытая группа: можно прийти один раз или возвращаться несколько встреч подряд. ☕️Для всех, кто столкнулся с утратой (потеря партнёра, родителя, друга, ребёнка, питомца). ☕️Единст…
🤗1
Весна заканчивается, а жизнь — нет. Вместе с жизнью всегда где-то рядом потери и горевание. Если не хочется переживать это в одиночку, то найти единомышленников можно здесь
Photo, posted without a caption
😁5
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @doulaoflife. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 813,952 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Польза и кринж” (@doulaoflife), 155 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/doulaoflife.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.