Photo, posted without a caption
❤🔥15🕊2

Channel
@curiosityfreedom
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
299subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001275517469 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @curiosityfreedom |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/curiosityfreedom |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:06 | 299 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:33 | 297 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:20 | 297 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 29 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (29 May 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 762 |
| Reactions total | 104 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 22:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
222 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 163 | 73.4% | |
| ❤🔥 | 28 | 12.6% | |
| 🔥 | 21 | 9.46% | |
| 🕊 | 6 | 2.70% | |
| 🦄 | 4 | 1.80% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 222reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
❤🔥15🕊2
Where your email finds me on Monday Вспомнила как люблю горы летом, идеальные +22, хайкинг, пятнистых коровок, сосны, свою хайкинговую одежду, разговоры с друзьями, чернику на склонах горстями, сок из малины (где вы найдете такой специалитет!) с газированной водой на привалах. Вообще, пусть будут благословенны друзья, которые погрузили нас в машину и отвезли в горы. Всем вам желаю таких людей рядом. После объектив…
❤14
Сходили вчера на Одиссею Нолана Надо обложиться дисклеймерами, я очень редко смотрела фильмы и стала ещё реже. Началось с занятий философского кружка, на примерах мы ощущали насколько легче вызвать аффект движущимися картинками. Я и текстами легко впечатляюсь, могу стоять перед картиной на которой буквально два цвета и чувствовать вал эмоций, а фильм, да ещё и на три часа и с баталиями — серьезное испытание для меня…
❤26
Что было дальше с цветами кабачка Я отправила цветы на профессиональную кухню как только поняла, что мне столько не съесть. Их фаршировали рикоттой, тархуном и анчоусом, зафритюрили в кляре. Спасибо шефу Андрею за такой опыт. В цветках кабачка, конечно, есть такая притягательная временность. Есть некий кармический прикол: наша семья во всех городах находит «свои» рестораны, бары и кафе и дальше существует где-то н…
❤14❤🔥9
Weekend delights Узнала, что у приятельницы моей подружки ферма с томатными теплицами, и принесла новость главному любителю помидоров в этом доме. В воскресенье получила посылку: курицу 4,5 кг, десяток домашних яиц, кило ароматнейших помидоров, зелень, мини-цукини и их цветы. А, ещё и цветы, которых хватило на две вазы. Ваза для цветов теперь нужна большая. Будем искать. Цветы цуккини были разделены и отправлены з…
❤13🔥6🦄4🕊1
Сегодня запрыгнула в исследование сна с Олей. Оля меня очаровала своей лекцией в «Неидеальном клубе». Тот случай, когда запоминаешь человека и «идешь на неё». Я в условно «нормальном» состоянии сплю просто отлично, считаю сон благословением и магией, готова жертвовать социальными активностями ради сна и бодрого утра. После ковида в ноябре у меня сломалась нервная система, и система сна-бодрствования пострадала очен…
❤13❤🔥1
Как же мне красиво в Лондоне! Я только что проехала London School of Economics. Фан факт— у меня есть диплом бакалавра в банках и финансах этого универа. При этом закончила универ я в 2011-м, а впервые побывала в Лондоне в 2016-м. Отсюда всегда легкое удивление при виде альма-матер. А где учились вы? Чему вас это научило?
❤16
Тааак хорошо в субботу утром села с какао и видом на Биг Бен (я очень люблю Лондон) и подвела, куда я двигалась эту неделю. Я приступала, немного зажмурившись. У меня появилось две учебы, и обе требуют внимания. Мы в поездке, а значит хочется повидать близких, да и посмотреть кое-что. На этой неделе добавился менеджент вишлиста М., у него скоро день рождения и хорошие друзья, которые с радостью дарят подарки. В рез…
❤9🔥7
Пока я собиралась показать картинки из поездки в Лондон (помним, Лондон = любимка) в мае, что я оттуда привезла, что я там ела, время прошло и я снова сюда доехала. И это уже тут, а не там. В этот раз не буду так делать, исправляюсь, буду показывать сразу. Первый раз живу в Лондоне с видом и горизонтом, со спортзалом и коворкингом в новом доме. Когда мы сюда ехали, поняла, что я этой весной говорила подруге, что хо…
❤22
Поняла, какая тема лидирует с отрывом. Благодарна за каждый голос — это вау. Пост пока зажала, но напишу спонтанное. Встретила у Юли Ардабьевской/жж duada сегодня фразу: Пойми (прими) какой ты - это и ограняй. Исчерпывающе описывает мой подход к работе с людьми и то, какой контекст я стремлюсь создавать.
❤10❤🔥3
Про что пишем дальше?
The shares total 148%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Три направления, которые меня сейчас интересуют Упоминаю в предыдущем посте и тут. Три направления: • future studies (ближайший спринт — in education); • ultra-contemporary art и как система, и с точки зрения развития собственной художественной практики (это было не просто смело…); • female wellness, wellbeing, weath (знаю, банально, но я сама женшина тридцатипяти лет, прости господи). Эти относительно новые смыслы…
❤17🕊3
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @curiosityfreedom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Про что пишем дальше?
The shares total 148%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 343,679 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Liberté, Égalité, Curiosité или просто Карина” (@curiosityfreedom), 299 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/curiosityfreedom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.