Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Полищук. Карьерная проводница

Channel

Полищук. Карьерная проводница

@coachpolishuk

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,288subscribers

+500 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001335489669
TypeChannel
Username@coachpolishuk
DescriptionЯ - Оля Полищук, карьерный стратег и бизнес-фасилитатор. AI ассистент, чтобы понять, что дальше https://perepridumai.com/ai-bot Как можно со мной поработать тут: https://taplink.cc/coachpolishuk
Created20 March 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held61
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/coachpolishuk

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

10,64911,28810,968.56 August 202612 November 2026
61 measurements spanning 98 days, net +500. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,553–11,384 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 18:0811,288+36
10 Nov 2026, 14:3511,252+16
8 Nov 2026, 23:0611,236+17
7 Nov 2026, 17:5511,219+11
6 Nov 2026, 16:4911,208+20
5 Nov 2026, 19:1611,188+77
4 Nov 2026, 19:1811,111+24
3 Nov 2026, 21:5911,087-20
2 Nov 2026, 22:2911,107-2
1 Nov 2026, 22:0611,109+6
31 Oct 2026, 23:2811,103-3
31 Oct 2026, 00:1611,106+7
30 Oct 2026, 02:3811,099+3
28 Oct 2026, 03:1911,096+1
27 Oct 2026, 06:0811,095-5
25 Oct 2026, 05:1511,100-1
24 Oct 2026, 01:5711,101+4
22 Oct 2026, 22:4711,097-7
21 Oct 2026, 22:3011,104-1
20 Oct 2026, 20:0111,105first reading

Engagement

47 posts held, back to 16 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.0%
avg views ÷ 11,288 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,800
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.77%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 47 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held47 (16 June 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total27,068
Reactions total1,291
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 22:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
182
Videos
2
Links
191

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

3,113 reactions across 46 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2,06466.3%
🔥51816.6%
❤‍🔥1665.33%
💯892.86%
👍642.06%
👏642.06%
😁310.996%
😭230.739%
👀130.418%
😨130.418%
🤗120.385%
💔110.353%
🥰80.257%
🐳70.225%
🤝50.161%
🌚40.128%
👌40.128%
👎40.128%
💩20.064%
🤔20.064%
8 further kinds90.289%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 47 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,113 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 7 of 15 posts held from the last 30 days (46.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 14:37 UTC≈1,200 views29 reactionsread 14 November 2026

«Но это же не я» — я часто слышу эту фразу на консультациях, именно в 2026-м. Обычно так человек описывает свою реакцию, когда видит названия новых позиций, если ищет по ключевым словам. И тут иронично: в требованиях к свежей роли на 80% указано то, что он уже делает. Точно делал несколько раз, или частично делал. Но название ему путает карты. Вместо того, чтобы откликнуться или банально обновить свой тайтл в Linke…

❤16🔥10👍3

10 Nov 2026, 14:38 UTC≈1,610 views50 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

👁️ Заметила странную штуку, хочу с вами свериться. В мире изменилась сезонность. Вот буквально. Раньше от сентября и осени мы ждали жирного сезона: люди возвращаются из летней спячки, и человеческий цикл обновления срабатывает. В этом году в части рынков и индустрий привычного оживления не случилось: покупатели осторожнее, а ожидаемая выручка не пришла по календарю. Найм тоже был осторожнее. В США крупные объявлен…

❤29💯12🔥8👍1

5 Nov 2026, 12:27 UTC≈1,980 views62 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Posted without readable text

❤39🔥14💯9

3 Nov 2026, 17:09 UTC≈1,900 views91 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Трансформирующая энергия Мы с моим терапевтом копаемся уже много месяцев в том, какой эффект я произвожу на людей, и слово, которое меня цепляет больше всего «энергоемкость». Вижу человека и сразу обращаю, сколько у него энергии, с какой энергией он говорит, как он делает дела: на воле, дисциплине, энергии, на эго… ну и копаюсь, а какая энергия у меня, и из чего я исхожу, когда бьюсь лбом о стены. В этом году у мен…

❤58🔥25❤‍🔥8

3 Nov 2026, 14:32 UTC≈1,880 views57 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

⚪️ Подождите, происходит распаковка эмоций ⚪️ За последние полгода моя (как и ваша работа) сильно изменилась. Я, как карьерный стратег и консультант, собрала за это время целую коллекцию паттернов и повторяющихся состояний, от консультации к консультации. И этот набор невысказанных, не всегда осознаннных ощущений много говорит о том, где мы все с вами оказались. Топ-3 эмоции сеньор-специалистов прямо сейчас и что …

❤37🔥13🌚4💯2💊1

30 Oct 2026, 10:32 UTC≈1,980 views66 reactionsread 14 November 2026

FOMO — главное слово и чувство этого года Fear of Missing Out, или страх упустить возможности. То самое состояние, когда фоном зудит «ты не успел», «ты не там». Но если раньше мы боялись пропустить главную вечеринку, открытие нового места, то сейчас открываешь ленту и чувствуешь себя технологически и карьерьно отстающим. Кажется, что все вокруг уже освоили, построили, научились делать 5 дел в час, пока ты только выб…

❤34💯19🔥9😭3❤‍🔥1

28 Oct 2026, 06:54 UTC≈1,820 views72 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Что со мной будет, если я не впишусь в новый рынок труда? Пожалуй, это главный вопрос, который сейчас висит в воздухе. Он обостряется по время новостей про большие увольнения или недо-увольнения, как прямо сейчас в Microsoft. Я вижу даже хрупкую надежду на ответ в стиле: «Если я не буду трогать AI, или сделаю вид, меня пронесет». Коротко и честно: нет, не пронесет. Просто-напросто потому что вы станете слишком доро…

❤56💯9🔥4👎3

26 Oct 2026, 14:01 UTC≈1,880 views83 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Мы все самозванцы, когда пробуем новое. Синдром активизируется ровно в момент, когда ты выходишь к незнакомым людям без привычных регалий и понятного контекста. Чем глубже экспертиза, тем изощреннее ты сомневаешься в себе. Особенно если ты дженералист и умеешь всего по чуть-чуть. Парадокс: я 8+ лет в коучинге и каждый день разбираю чужие сомнения. Но на прошлой неделе сама села в эту же лужу, когда организовывала …

🔥44❤25💯11🥰3

21 Oct 2026, 12:08 UTC≈2,280 views268 reactionsread 14 November 2026

К 38 у меня неплохая сборка: с багами, обновлениями, странными функциями и неожиданно хорошей производительностью. И я больше не фрустрирую, что чего-то не случилось. Не всё в моей жизни мой осознанный выбор. Что-то случилось, что-то не случилось, что-то я упустила, что-то меня спасло. Но всё это теперь моё. В 38 я не стала женщиной из своего старого плана. Зато, кажется, впервые стала женщиной, с которой мне само…

❤183👏40❤‍🔥36💯8🎉1

21 Oct 2026, 12:08 UTC≈2,060 views288 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Другие 38 Вчера был мой день рождения. И это не те 38 лет, которые я представляла себе в 28. Мне казалось, что к этому возрасту у меня точно будут дети. Двое. Может быть, собака, дом, муж и какая-то внятная семейная архитектура. Но, кажется, я просто выросла из человека, который тогда составлял этот план. И как-то себе представлял жизнь. Сейчас я профессиональный admirer чужих младенцев. И, поверьте, для вашей мал…

❤198🔥47❤‍🔥30🤗12👍1

20 Oct 2026, 12:25 UTC≈1,740 views34 reactionsread 14 November 2026

ИИ заберёт твою работу. Только не по той причине которую ты думаешь. Вчера ходила на лекцию к Оле Полищук @coachpolishuk — одной из умнейших женщин которых я знаю. Она говорила про карьерную стратегию и что будет с работой в ближайшие 3 года. Главный инсайт. И контринтуитивный. Дело не в конкретных скиллах. Если выучил какой-то ИИ-навык полгода назад и не апдейтил, ты уже позади людей которые начали вчера 😅 ИИ раз…

❤27👍3❤‍🔥2💩2

Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @coachpolishuk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@coachpolishuk edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
26 August 2026
Most recent edit
26 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Aug 2026, 15:59 UTCAnonymous Poll194 voters

Что вас больше всего волнует?

  1. Моя роль исчезает и ее очень меняет AI, а что дальше не знаю16%
  2. Хочу поменять ВСЕ: зп, нишу, компанию, переехать, что делать?66%
  3. Как стать востребованным и AI first в моей профессии?30%

The shares total 112%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 13 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Девушка с Деньгами
@devushkasdengami · 28,493
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 September 2026
Olymarkes Daily
@markesdaily · 27,565
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 September 2026
Канал Вари Веденеевой
@varya_daily · 31,605
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 5 September 2026
Надежда в HR
@NadezhdaHR · 19,627
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 30 September 2026
deep mind 2.0
@mindfulleadersrussia · 20,588
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 29 September 2026
Нагуглила карьеру
@dreamcatchme · 27,697
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 September 2026
Matskevich - brains, love and robots
@Matskevich · 24,970
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 September 2026
Dasha’s notes | люди и смыслы
@technohumanist · 39,133
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Полищук. Карьерная проводница” (@coachpolishuk), 11,288 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/coachpolishuk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.