Channel
@loveandcuriosity
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
155subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002479990394 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @loveandcuriosity |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/loveandcuriosity |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 155 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:01 | 154 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:41 | 154 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 20 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (20 May 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 67 |
| Reactions total | 8 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 19:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
52 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 27 | 51.9% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 15.4% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 9.62% | |
| 😍 | 5 | 9.62% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 5.77% | |
| 💘 | 3 | 5.77% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 1.92% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 52reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Друзья, всем привет! Недавно я стала гостем подкаста у Даши Орловой, приглашаю вас послушать ❤️ Буду рада вашим комментариям, мыслям, тому что откликается и особенно тому, что нет 🤪 ps весь август я погружаюсь в метод Фельденкрайза глубжеее и уже с сентября мы с вами начнем новый сезон с интересными практиками! целую и шлю привет из Португалии
🔥5
Помните, я недавно выкладывала подкаст про ответственность за здоровье? Надеюсь, вы слушаете их: там и полезного много, и можно просто отдохнуть в доброй компании друзей. Для продолжения темы мы решили позвать в студию гостя - Олю Царёву, которая работает по методу Фельденкрайза. Получилось очень продуктивно пообщаться и ответить на вопросы: ➡️ где у себя искать осанку? ➡️ почему многим проще лениться, чем занимать…
❤🔥3
Дорогие, у нас сегодня в онлайн клубе в 19:00 мск будет невероятная практика, соединяем все: стопы, бедра, таз, позвоночник и голову Будет очень классное ощущение после: целостности, легкости Присоединиться супер просто через бот @feldenkrais_pay_bot
Так приятно, когда ценности и интересы совпадают с теми, кто приходит в мои программы! Радуюсь Сильно ❤️
💘3
Сегодня запрыгнула в исследование сна с Олей. Оля меня очаровала своей лекцией в «Неидеальном клубе». Тот случай, когда запоминаешь человека и «идешь на неё». Я в условно «нормальном» состоянии сплю просто отлично, считаю сон благословением и магией, готова жертвовать социальными активностями ради сна и бодрого утра. После ковида в ноябре у меня сломалась нервная система, и система сна-бодрствования пострадала очен…
Мои дорогие, с понедельника запустится финальный раз погружение в сон в том виде, в котором оно было придумано изначально Это настоящая энциклопедия о том, как сделать сон — целительной силой Все материалы останутся с вами навсегда Если вы тревожно спите, не ощущаете бодрости по утрам, знакомы с реактивной бессонницей [это та, что случается перед важными событиями или ввиду болезни], то я приглашаю вас в погружени…
Сколько себя помню, меня интриговало одно слово — призвание. И с этим постом я хочу вернуться в этот канал, потому что этот текст будет про любовь и Фельденкрайз Меня интересовала не профессия, не карьера, а именно то самое место, где встречаются интерес, талант и польза, которую я могу принести миру. Место, где не нужно заставлять себя — нужно просто быть собой, только чуть внимательнее, чем обычно. Я читала книги…
❤11🔥3💔1
Дорогой Екатеринбург, привет! Хочу поделиться небольшим дайджестом практик на ближайшее время и давайте встречаться 🫶🏼 Сегодня, вторник 19:00 мск [онлайн] практика на стопы, связь стопа — таз, влияние на осанку ➡️ присоединиться можно через бот Пятница, 18:00 [оффлайн] в Екатеринбурге практика для освобождения позвоночника, снятия напряжения ➡️ присоединиться можно написав мне в личные сообщения @olitsareva
❤5
Друзья, привет! У нас сегодня вечером в 19:00 мск практика, я бы сказала, что она очень редкая, потому что сочетает в себе и улучшения подвижности позвоночника, и освобождение шеи и работу с общим состоянием Очень ее люблю и советую вам попробовать! Присоединиться можно через @feldenkrais_pay_bot
❤3
Повторюсь, что я не умею писать, но Наська пишет так, что я проваливаюсь куда-то в глубины и потом сразу столько внутри рождается 🤌🏼 Мы с 15 июня запускаем группу про тревогу, кстати
Читаю хорошую философскую книжку про тревогу ——— потому что мы с Олей пересобрали встречи про отношения с тревожностью, и будет всё совсем по-другому - мы начнем с ощущения базовой телесности младенца и закончим высшей осознанностью зрелого человека ❤️🔥 Я еще напишу об всем что будем делать, потому что мне оч нравится ______ Но книжка. Вот, например, о том, что тревогу порождает в нас примерно все, потому что реа…
❤1
Дорогие, всем привет, у меня для вас новость: я планирую провести в Екатеринбурге 1,5 месяца летом [с середины июня, до конца июля] и … нашлась уютная студия, где я бы очень хотела встречаться раз в неделю и познакомить вас с методом Фельденкрайза Если вы в екб и хотели бы попробовать, опции по времени сейчас такие: • Любой будний день в 9:00 • Пятница 19:00 • Суббота в 12:00 Что думаете?
😍5
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @loveandcuriosity. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Друзья, привет! Хочется делиться тут с вами какой-нибудь полезной информацией о теле.. и душе )) В какой формат вам нравится здесь погружаться больше всего?
The shares total 182%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 526,822 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“про любовь 🤍 и Фельденкрайз” (@loveandcuriosity), 155 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/loveandcuriosity.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.