International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 54 days, net -1,112. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 35,750–37,196 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
30 Sept 2026, 09:00
35,917
-253
18 Sept 2026, 04:00
36,170
-33
15 Sept 2026, 23:41
36,203
-19
14 Sept 2026, 07:41
36,222
-27
12 Sept 2026, 14:00
36,249
-33
10 Sept 2026, 11:39
36,282
-75
7 Sept 2026, 10:18
36,357
-50
4 Sept 2026, 15:56
36,407
-30
3 Sept 2026, 00:37
36,437
-48
1 Sept 2026, 22:04
36,485
-33
31 Aug 2026, 19:34
36,518
-28
30 Aug 2026, 16:34
36,546
-26
29 Aug 2026, 19:54
36,572
-27
28 Aug 2026, 20:53
36,599
-25
27 Aug 2026, 19:55
36,624
-17
26 Aug 2026, 17:39
36,641
-25
25 Aug 2026, 16:45
36,666
-27
24 Aug 2026, 14:57
36,693
-33
22 Aug 2026, 20:25
36,726
-30
21 Aug 2026, 09:55
36,756
first reading
Engagement
73 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 100 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
25.4%
avg views ÷ 35,917 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,120
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.53%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 73 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 October 2026
Posts held
73 (1 August 2026 – 2 October 2026)
Views total
237,140
Reactions total
3,625
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Oct 2026, 17:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈8,100
Videos
≈2,700
Links
≈293
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
23m 32s
Average length
47s
Measured directly from 30 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8,612 reactions across 72 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,875
33.4%
👍
1,361
15.8%
🤬
1,181
13.7%
👏
1,155
13.4%
😁
900
10.5%
🔥
473
5.49%
😢
370
4.30%
😱
169
1.96%
👎
128
1.49%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 72 of the 73 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,612 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 73 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 2 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#SONDAKİKA MHK soruşturmasında, gözaltındaki Ferhat Gündoğdu'nun dijital materyallerinde:
- Trabzonspor Başkanı Ertuğrul Doğan'ın belirli bir hakemi istemediği,
- Bu hakemin Trabzonspor karşılaşmalarında ve VAR görevlerinde görevlendirilmemesi talebinin İbrahim Hacıosmanoğlu tarafından Ferhat Gündoğdu'ya iletildiği görüldü.
🚨 TÜRK FUTBOLUNDA SORUŞTURMA BÜYÜYOR!
İstanbul Cumhuriyet Başsavcılığı tarafından yürütülen soruşturma kapsamında, aralarında MHK Başkanı Ferhat Gündoğdu’nun da bulunduğu 7 kişi gözaltına alındı. Soruşturma, hakem atamaları, klasman belirleme ve sınav süreçlerine müdahale edildiği iddialarını kapsıyor.
Türkiye Futbol Federasyonu, bahis soruşturması kapsamında 448 mevcut ve eski kulüp yöneticisini tedbiren disipline…
SONDAKİKA | AK Parti Sosyal Politikalardan Sorumlu Genel Başkan Yardımcılığına Prof. Dr. Hülya Terzioğlu atandı.
Terzioğlu, görevinden istifa eden Fatma Betül Sayan Kaya'nın yerine geldi; atama AK Parti Sözcüsü Ömer Çelik tarafından duyuruldu.
MHK soruşturmasında dikkat çeken bir bulgu ortaya çıktı:
Ferdi Karadoruk'un kullandığı WhatsApp hesabından çocukların cinsel istismarına ilişkin müstehcen bir videonun yüklendiği, NCMEC raporuyla dosyaya girdi.
Karadoruk, hesabının hacklendiğini savundu.
Ancak bilirkişi incelemesinde bu iddiayı destekleyen herhangi bir veriye rastlanmadığı belirtildi.
Özgür Özel'in fuhuş ve uyuşturucu soruşturmasında tutuklanan Atilla Yıldırım ile ezan okunurken çilingir sofrası kurup alem yaptığı görüntüler ortaya çıktı.
SONDAKİKA | Şarkıcı Mustafa Sandal’ın eşi Melis Sandal ve babası Cihan Sütşurup’un tüm malvarlıklarına el konuldu.
Haklarından yakalama kararı çıkartıldı.
#SONDAKİKA I
Fatma Betül Sayan Kaya 2,2 milyar lirayı iade etti.
Fon soruşturması kapsamında adı gündeme gelen eski Aile ve Sosyal Politikalar Bakanı Fatma Betül Sayan Kaya ile eşi İlyas Kaya’nın, Özata Denizcilik hisselerindeki işlemlerden elde ettikleri öne sürülen yaklaşık 2,2 milyar lirayı iade ettiği öğrenildi.
Söz konusu tutar, Hazine ve Maliye Bakanlığı tarafından bildirilen hesaba aktarıldı.
Makamı, mevkisi ne olursa olsun; Cumhurbaşkanı Erdoğan’ın milletin karşısında başını eğdiren, kaşıkla biriktirdiği itibarı kepçeyle ziyan eden bürokrat ya da siyasetçi kim varsa yaptıkları kamuoyunun önünde konuşulmalı ve sorgulanmalı.
“Gizli Servis” olarak yanlışların karşısında, doğrunun ve Cumhurbaşkanının yanında duracağız.
Cumhurbaşkanı Erdoğan: "Biz gerekirse sıkıntı çekeriz gerekirse bedel öderiz ama haksızlık karşısında susmayız, zulme asla rıza göstermeyiz.
Tayyip Erdoğan olarak, büyük bir milletin Cumhurbaşkanı olarak, bu kürsüden mazlumların hakkını savunmaya, sesi olmaya devam edeceğim."
Cumhurbaşkanı Erdoğan: (LGBT hk.)
“Küresel cinsiyetsizleştirme politikalarının, aile kurumuyla birlikte masum çocukları da hedef alan bir kuşatmaya dönüştüğünü bilmemiz lazım.
Bu kuşatmayı ancak kadın ve erkekten oluşan aileyi koruyarak kırabiliriz.”
❤155👏39👍13👎1😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 73 posts we hold for @gizliservis06. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 1 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Recep Tayyip Erdoğan @RTErdogan · 93,275 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 16 August 2026
ConflictTR @conflict_tr · 56,309 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 August 2026
3. Dünya Savaşı @ww3media · 97,658 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
SİYAH SANCAK @siyahsancak · 56,910 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 August 2026
Muhammed Tahir Şimşek @tahirsimsektv · 144,058 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 August 2026
Buzz News 🇹🇷 Türkiye @buzznews_tr · 90,052 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 17 August 2026
Daily Islamist 🇹🇷 🇵🇸 @dailyislamist · 43,065 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 28 August 2026
Anadolu Ajansı @anadoluajansi · 21,911 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 22 September 2026
TCDEFENSE @tcdefense · 103,184 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 August 2026
Memurlar.net @memurlarnett · 20,986 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 25 September 2026
Haberler | Son Dakika • Gündem @haberler · 22,352 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 September 2026
KIZIL TİM @kizil_tim · 19,961 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 29 September 2026
gdh @gundemedairhs · 50,508 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 August 2026
Buzz💡 İlginç Bilgiler @buzzbilgiler · 36,714 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 1 September 2026
SonDakika Haberler 🇹🇷 @sondakikahaberlere · 59,953 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 22 August 2026
TRT Haber @trthaberdijital · 68,561 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 August 2026
Medya Haber @haberturkiyemedya · 47,484 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GİZLİ SERVİS” (@gizliservis06), 35,917 subscribers as measured 30 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gizliservis06.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.