Channel
@multichain_madness
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,851subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001508606580 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @multichain_madness |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/multichain_madness |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:03 | 2,851 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:13 | 2,855 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:14 | 2,858 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:02 | 2,859 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (20 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 14,525 |
| Reactions total | 38 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:06 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
38 reactions across 10 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 31 | 81.6% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 15.8% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 2.63% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Most KOLS will talk about how much money they made and how insane their calls were, posting some random screenshots. Not many people in this space will do real talk, i try my best here. I am just a normal degen trying to survive in this space and surviving starts with not losing all your money.
❤15
Rotation is insane, i checked so many coins and all of them and also most of my watchlist are either stable or down. Sure, there are some winners especially $Cashcat but other then that you had to pick the exact winners and sell them before the rotation started. This is not the market i like. If you make money constantly rn then go on with what your are doing, if you lose money stop. This is not the time to risk b…
https://x.com/Boost010/status/2084624873129734464 https://x.com/Boost010/status/2083892182071554216 https://x.com/Boost010/status/2083214110628442341 https://x.com/Boost010/status/2082154706244436000 This guy did a REAL deep research on all On-chain stuff you can find about $Wallet Not buying anything new as i got burned quite a bit so far, but still following this here
Okay i guess i got my answer, not a market to hold anything longer then some hours. There are very few winners out there, if you pick them gg, if not you will probably lose money. Still not the market i want to play in
Most of these v4 coins are up many x's the last days and have low liq, so maybe you will get a better entry. I hope we will finally get a meta that stays alive for more than some hours or days. These v4 hook mechanics enable devs to get creative and build new cool stuff, not just copies of others. Positioned myself into multiple coins that i mentioned as i find it hard to make a single bet. If i had to it would b…
Especially $SZR is my darkhorse which i follow since the start. Totally unique mechanics, could change the launchpad game. As its much more complicated i would advise you to research on your own on twitter and the post i send, there are some very good articles explaining the underlying idea which raises the floor. I advise you to buy from the website to be safe, not sure if every bot will pick up the liq correctly
SZR thesis: https://www.gg.xyz/post/d21de41e-8796-42ce-b9c7-5b86c9aa9a57?ref=0xdaes URU thesis: https://x.com/urugemu/status/2082777067138003052 Backed Thesis: https://x.com/deadshotXBT/status/2082754302267867485
v4 stuff i find interesting: $SZR 2.2m 0xbeD7c1660a01dbEEe225bd893ac31727a91A5773 $URU 900k 0x9fbe210007dDd8389f98d0253018e65CC48b9D24 $Loop 1m 0x00000000000050806673B532D7486ac114c1De3F $Backed 500k 0x7168563B0E70124f0C7c0cF2F13a8D1861BAf4A5
casual -90% drop on $wood from ATH, crazy. Guess i was still too early with betting on mid or long term holds, hope you play it safe. Remember: All about preserving capital for the real bull. Yesterday we had this 1h where pipedog launched and went to 40m which felt like the good old bull run days.
❤1👍1
$wood getting absolutely destroyed, from 30m to 5m in some days with good news only. Looks super sus, either goated entry or something is off... Will just hold here and pray, don't like the market for any dcaing rn
🤝1
https://x.com/0xMerp/status/2081081439991554392 This is exactly my take. The market is always risky AF, you can lose money very fast. For some degens it only takes one wrong click or decision to wipe out the port that has been build over months or years. So the most important thing is to learn risk management and to know when to wait. Boring stuff i know, but making and the harder part preserving the money isnt bo…
👍1
I used to bridge to EVERY new chain in good markets. Right now i dont see a good r/r here, there is just not enough volume around. See you hopefully soon in a better market again
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @multichain_madness. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 792,723 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Multichain Journal” (@multichain_madness), 2,851 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/multichain_madness.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.