9 measurements spanning 9 days, net -26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,451–12,492 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 15:08
12,456
-19
14 Aug 2026, 20:34
12,475
+2
13 Aug 2026, 12:34
12,473
-5
12 Aug 2026, 12:45
12,478
-3
11 Aug 2026, 14:26
12,481
+1
10 Aug 2026, 15:46
12,480
-7
8 Aug 2026, 14:03
12,487
+5
7 Aug 2026, 19:01
12,482
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:59
12,482
first reading
Engagement
29 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
17.7%
avg views ÷ 12,456 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,210
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.352%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 29 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held
29 (13 July 2026 – 13 August 2026)
Views total
39,740
Reactions total
130
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 12:51 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 57s
Average length
44s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
150 reactions across 22 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
80
53.3%
👍
34
22.7%
😁
12
8.00%
🔥
6
4.00%
🥴
5
3.33%
🤔
4
2.67%
👏
3
2.00%
🤣
2
1.33%
👀
1
0.667%
💩
1
0.667%
🕊
1
0.667%
🥰
1
0.667%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 150reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
❗️Un agriculteur a fait confiance à l'intelligence artificielle pour obtenir des conseils agricoles, après qu'elle l'ait aidé pendant environ un an. Ensuite, elle a contribué à détruire 25 acres de ses cultures.
Cet agriculteur chinois, âgé de 67 ans, utilisait un chatbot d'IA pour obtenir des conseils sur les mauvaises herbes et les parasites. Il a suivi les recommandations pour mélanger plusieurs produits chimique…
DeepSeek vient de lancer V4 Pro 🚀
DeepSeek améliore considérablement ses derniers modèles avec une fonctionnalité "Agent" avancée, offrant une capacité de raisonnement flexible qui s'adapte des réponses rapides aux tâches complexes.
V4 Pro et V4 Flash prennent désormais en charge différents niveaux d'effort de raisonnement : faible, élevé et maximal. De plus, V4 Pro bénéficie d'une intégration native avec l'API Ope…
NOUVELLE INFO : Des entreprises de Bitcoin et de cryptomonnaies demandent aux laboratoires d'IA un accès anticipé à leurs modèles les plus puissants afin de lutter contre les pirates informatiques.
Elles affirment qu'une IA performante peut identifier les failles des logiciels Bitcoin, mais que les règles de sécurité empêchent souvent les chercheurs de confiance d'utiliser ces outils.
Elles soutiennent que les pira…
Vous avez manqué le dernier mouvement ? 👀
Pas de panique — la prochaine configuration se met en place ⏱️📊
Observez comment les entrées intelligentes sont construites et restez prêts 🚀 -
Nouvelle offre - https://t.me/+lT2BIounK3RiOGUy
💲Rejoignez-nous dès maintenant et obtenez des bénéfices garantis de plus de 300 % par jour💵
‼️Offre limitée dans le temps, seulement pendant 30 minutes‼️
👇Dépêchez-vous et rejoignez-nous dès maintenant👇
https://t.me/+lT2BIounK3RiOGUy
Anthropic recrute actuellement un « enquêteur sur les risques internes » pour surveiller ses employés.
Deux jours après des informations selon lesquelles le PDG, Dario Amodei, s'inquiéterait du fait que les nouveaux employés rejoignent l'entreprise uniquement pour l'argent, et non pour la mission...
@IAMinute ✅
ELON MUSK : « Nous manquons de questions à poser à l'IA. Tout est devenu trivial. Le test ultime pour l'IA sera la réalité. Est-elle capable de créer une voiture, une fusée, ou un nouveau médicament ? Est-ce que ça fonctionne ? La réalité est le juge ultime. »
🗣« Un petit nombre de personnes décident de l'avenir de l'IA, et avec elle, de l'avenir de l'humanité. »
Yoshua Bengio, chercheur en IA et co-président ainsi que directeur scientifique de LawZero, met en garde contre le fait qu'un petit nombre d'acteurs façonnent la manière dont l'IA est développée et déployée.
L'IA transformera le monde, mais son orientation ne peut pas rester concentrée entre quelques entreprises…
C’EST LE MOMENT DE REJOINDRE UNPRICED.
⠀
Masters 1000 sur dur, US Open et reprise des grands championnats européens : une période majeure de la saison commence.
⠀
Regarde les chiffres : 574 positions suivies de mai à juillet, +8,36 % de bankroll.
⠀
Analyses complètes, décisions avant match et résultats transparents.
⠀
→ REJOINS UNPRICED : https://t.me/unpriced_tennisdata
⠀
18+ | Le jeu doit rester un divertissement
Le géant américain Anthropic a conclu un accord de 1,5 milliard de dollars après avoir été accusé d'avoir entraîné son IA Claude sur près de 7 millions de livres piratés.
Si la justice a validé le recours au scan de livres achetés légalement, elle a sanctionné l'utilisation d'archives numériques illicites.
❤12
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @IAMinute. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“IA MINUTE” (@IAMinute), 12,456 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IAMinute.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.