Channel
@invmru
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
540subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001575069335 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @invmru |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/invmru |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:50 | 540 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:31 | 540 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
126 reactions across 19 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 39 | 31.0% | |
| 🔥 | 36 | 28.6% | |
| ❤ | 11 | 8.73% | |
| 🏆 | 6 | 4.76% | |
| 🤔 | 6 | 4.76% | |
| 🙏 | 5 | 3.97% | |
| 🤣 | 5 | 3.97% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 3.17% | |
| 🐳 | 4 | 3.17% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 3.17% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 2.38% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 0.794% | |
| 🤓 | 1 | 0.794% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 0.794% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 126reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 November 2024 to 19 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Давно бесило, что нестабильный интернет обрывает ssh-туннели. Понимаешь это, когда что-то перестает работать, и идешь руками перезапускать (ssh -L) Надоело и сделал менюбар-приложение для macOS: проброс портов (-L) в один клик, и оно само поднимает туннели обратно, как только связь вернулась Дальше люди добавили через PR то, чего не хватало: - SOCKS в приватную сеть (-D) - отдать свой локальный порт на сервер, remo…
🔥6👍1
Кринж уровня бана юзеров за использование tornado.cash происходит прямо сейчас за ончейн связи с HTX. 26 мая UK внесла HTX в санкционный список применив к криптобирже Reg 17A (Russia Sanctions Regulations 2019). Норма запрещает проводить платёж, если санкционная сущность была где угодно в цепочке. Формально это обязывает только UK-юрисдикцию. По факту Chainalysis/Elliptic раскатали разметку за часы - и AML-фильтры в…
🐳4👍1🤔1
Пару часов назад был любопытный свап 56m$aUSDT в 36000$aEthAave https://etherscan.io/tx/0x9fa9feab3c1989a33424728c23e6de07a40a26a98ff7ff5139f3492ce430801f источник https://x.com/hklst4r/status/2032170722286563791?s=46 Был создан такой дисбаланс, что первый mev бот отправил bribe 26m$ валидатору titan builder и заработал чистыми 9m$, но было так много случаев и подсчет не окончательный. https://etherscan.io/tx/0x453…
👏4🔥1🫡1😁1
Detailed report from Foom.cash https://x.com/Foomclub_/status/2028231845788188747
❤1🔥1
Порадуемся за них, от чистого сердца
На таком грустном рынке тестирую другие направления. Одним из них, с некоторой полезностью, оказался эвристический анализ смарт-контрактов. Алгоритм поиска - тема для отдельного поста. Veil - аналог Tornado Cash на ZK-SNARKs. Проверка подписи была реализована некорректно - оказалось возможным забрать чужие депозиты, передав слабую подпись (подробнее тут). Атака на пул "0.1 ETH": basescan Остальные пулы через 10 м…
👍9❤1🔥1
Давно не писал, есть чем поделиться.
🏆6
Поговорка "люди - новая нефть" эволюционирует в "данные - новая нефть". Важно хранить данные поближе к себе. Собственно, про доступ к моделям: - первоисточник openai, cohere, mistral, claude, x.ai - (по подписке) - посредники openrouter, togetherai (оплата по затраченным поинтам) как компромис. - - Оплата криптой/картой - - Доступ к сложнодоступным моделям (привет claude через карту) - - Кажется, что тут бизнес моде…
🔥4🤔2⚡1❤1
Посвящается тем, кто что-то слышал, но не вникал в построение ai-агентов. Явный тренд пошел с 2024 года, с августа 2024 пошли аи мемы на солане, сейчас все чаще попадаются сайты с аи чат ботами, например помогают ориентироваться в документации. Если углубляться в семантику, то корректное описание такое: - ai agent - автономная система, как игровой npc, который сам что-то там делает. - ai workflow - автоматизация не…
👍4⚡2🔥1🤓1
В связи с большим хаком Bybit (подробности взлома) запущена форма приема репортов (твит; сайт), где можно проявить навыки сыщика и зарепортить места, куда отмываются токены, стейблы, а регулируемые площадки могут не догадываться о рисках, но могут пойти на сотрудничество. Уже размечено 10% средств, еще 90% не размечены и ждут репортов, за которые есть шанс получить награду в 5% и 5% площадке, что содействует. Это в…
👍4😁2⚡1
123
🙏5👍1🔥1🗿1
С развитием AI агентов, которые сами пользуются браузером и имеют доступ к web3 кошелькам, определенно должен появиться и такой редкий баг, что-то вроде sql-injection в промпт и это однажды будет плохо обработано и приведет к убыткам. Грубый пример: - аи бот зашел через браузер в блог, взял первый абзац - результат без изменений передал в код юзера - код юзера с грубым нарушением использует eval() для расширения кон…
👍9❤1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @invmru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 691,512 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“InVM - изнутри о Web3” (@invmru), 540 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/invmru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.