Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for кПТСР: чемодан с текстами

Channel

кПТСР: чемодан с текстами

@cptsd_suitecase

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

11,808subscribers

+350 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001823669300
TypeChannel
Username@cptsd_suitecase
DescriptionкПТСР в жизни, культуре и психотерапии. О комплексной травме и психотерапии. Канал веду я - Анастасия Жичкина (@sova_i_zerkalo), социальный психолог, кандидат наук, приемная мать и человек с опытом особого родительства.
Created11 December 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held57
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/cptsd_suitecase

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 34% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

11,45811,81311,635.56 August 2026 — 11,458 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,459 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,461 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,462 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,464 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,465 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,471 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,484 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,487 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,491 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,494 subscribers23 August 2026 — 11,505 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,513 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,519 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,524 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,530 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,539 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,542 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,548 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,555 subscribers4 September 2026 — 11,564 subscribers7 September 2026 — 11,576 subscribers10 September 2026 — 11,587 subscribers12 September 2026 — 11,599 subscribers14 September 2026 — 11,613 subscribers15 September 2026 — 11,617 subscribers18 September 2026 — 11,628 subscribers29 September 2026 — 11,652 subscribers5 October 2026 — 11,676 subscribers9 October 2026 — 11,694 subscribers13 October 2026 — 11,692 subscribers14 October 2026 — 11,700 subscribers15 October 2026 — 11,703 subscribers16 October 2026 — 11,713 subscribers17 October 2026 — 11,718 subscribers18 October 2026 — 11,721 subscribers19 October 2026 — 11,730 subscribers20 October 2026 — 11,735 subscribers21 October 2026 — 11,746 subscribers22 October 2026 — 11,745 subscribers23 October 2026 — 11,758 subscribers24 October 2026 — 11,754 subscribers27 October 2026 — 11,758 subscribers28 October 2026 — 11,766 subscribers29 October 2026 — 11,768 subscribers30 October 2026 — 11,767 subscribers31 October 2026 — 11,773 subscribers1 November 2026 — 11,777 subscribers2 November 2026 — 11,782 subscribers3 November 2026 — 11,783 subscribers4 November 2026 — 11,786 subscribers5 November 2026 — 11,787 subscribers6 November 2026 — 11,795 subscribers7 November 2026 — 11,798 subscribers8 November 2026 — 11,806 subscribers9 November 2026 — 11,813 subscribers11 November 2026 — 11,808 subscribers11,8086 August 202611 November 2026
57 measurements spanning 97 days, net +350. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,405–11,866 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 03:4911,808-5
9 Nov 2026, 14:3111,813+7
8 Nov 2026, 09:4611,806+8
7 Nov 2026, 07:1511,798+3
6 Nov 2026, 07:2811,795+8
5 Nov 2026, 08:2611,787+1
4 Nov 2026, 05:4911,786+3
3 Nov 2026, 04:4111,783+1
2 Nov 2026, 06:1011,782+5
1 Nov 2026, 04:4911,777+4
31 Oct 2026, 02:5011,773+6
30 Oct 2026, 03:4111,767-1
29 Oct 2026, 06:0011,768+2
28 Oct 2026, 04:0011,766+8
27 Oct 2026, 04:4511,758+4
24 Oct 2026, 23:3811,754-4
23 Oct 2026, 22:0811,758+13
22 Oct 2026, 18:4911,745-1
21 Oct 2026, 16:2911,746+11
20 Oct 2026, 10:4111,735first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 3 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.7%
avg views ÷ 11,808 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,620
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.22%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held26 (3 April 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total14,490
Reactions total901
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 09:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
18
Videos
5
Links
112

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

7,443 reactions across 26 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤4,50860.6%
💔1,11114.9%
🔥95812.9%
👍5217.00%
😢1652.22%
🤝600.806%
🤔580.779%
👏500.672%
🥰100.134%
🤗20.027%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,443 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 3 April 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 4 posts held from the last 30 days (25.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 16:05 UTC≈1,990 views142 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Про отношения с критиком: "Hi Ren" Хочу показать клип про часть, которая выглядит как типичное "не-Я" - обесценивает, оскорбляет и критикует мерзким тоном. О внутренней войне и о том, во что может превратиться часть самого человека, который хочет быть хорошим, ну хотя бы нормальным. Как эта часть перерождается в то, что начинает заедать человеку жизнь, именно потому, что этот человек хочет быть хорошим и нормальным…

❤85🔥34👍9😢7💔5🤔1🥰1

22 Oct 2026, 18:18 UTC≈4,460 views223 reactionsread 12 November 2026

В комментариях к предыдущем посту многие просили пояснить, что конкретно помогло не избегать сложностей. Как я понимаю, помогла примерно такая цепочка осознаний: 1. Получилось связать негативное отношение к систематическим усилиям с травматическим опытом: в ходе реабилитации в детстве у меня не было результата от систематических усилий, и это значило тогда, что я плохо стараюсь и меня такую нельзя любить". 2. Полу…

❤162🔥37👏15😢7🤔2

22 Oct 2026, 17:19 UTC≈4,390 views258 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Обещала про насилие и дисциплину. (...) Некоторое время назад я вдруг подумала — интересно, почему я ни в чем не могу на себя положиться? Я не могу попросить себя ни о великом - дописать книгу - ни о бытовом - чистить зубы дважды в день. Ладно, книгу можно чем-то объяснить (травма, отсутствие таланта, страх начать, страх закончить, все герои живы и прочтут, этика, да и просто страшно блин), но зубы?? А лицо умыть?…

❤170🔥47👍19💔15🤔4👏2😢1

22 Oct 2026, 17:19 UTC≈3,650 views278 reactionsread 12 November 2026

"Если вы делаете что-то сложное - вам нелегко. Это нормально" Самонасилие - одна из привычек, которые оставляет после себя КПТСР. Просто потому, что в моменте насилие работает. Как в рассказе Виктора Драгунского, эпизод, когда Дениска пытается заставить себя прыгнуть с вышки: - Ну! Прыгай же! Ну! Прыгай! Тухля! Протухля! Вонюхля! И когда я обозвал себя вонюхлей, я не выдержал обиды и шагнул вперёд. (помогло!) Но о…

❤191🔥41👍27💔11😢6👏2

12 Oct 2026, 15:51 UTC≈5,030 views132 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Книга и курс: промежуточные итоги и планы Книгу "Ну что с того, что я там был" мы все-таки выставили на Озон, так как многие люди покупают книги только там. Если не подходит цена на Озоне (2900), то на нашем сайте книга стоит 1600 рублей. При заказе можно выбрать Яндекс Доставку или Авито Доставку. Ещё книгу можно купить в Москве в Фаланстере за 1500 рублей. В комментариях спрашивают, не появилась ли полная аудиов…

❤85👍24🔥22🥰1

2 Oct 2026, 09:52 UTC≈7,870 views212 reactionsread 12 November 2026
File

Смотрите, какой интересный опросник. Называется "Шкала заботы о себе", хотя по сути он, наоборот, о незаботе - все пункты сформулированы негативно. Онлайн-тест - здесь (разработка Дарьи Касаткиной). Наряду с понятными факторами, которые вносят вклад в незаботу: • саморазрушительное поведение ("Я всегда во всем виню себя" и "Когда мне плохо, я злюсь на себя") • трудность просить и принимать помощь ("Я держу свои …

❤131👍45🔥29😢5🤗1🥰1

25 Sept 2026, 15:06 UTC≈7,950 views263 reactionsread 12 November 2026

КОГДА ЧЕЛОВЕК НЕ ОЩУЩАЕТ СОБСТВЕННОЙ ЦЕННОСТИ Вместе с клиническим психологом Юлией Литвиновой (Psychology Lab) мы записали видео о проблеме, когда человек не ощущает собственной ценности и вынужден снова и снова искать внешние подтверждения тому, что он имеет значение (немного писала об этой проблеме здесь). Может выглядеть как перфекционизм, или как синдром самозванца, или как повышенная чувствительность к критике…

❤155🔥59👏21💔13😢9🤔6

24 Sept 2026, 12:04 UTC≈5,960 views95 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Курс для терапевтов «КПТСР в практике психотерапевта: дискуссионные вопросы» 🔥 Для тех, кто давно хотел поговорить о работе с людьми с комплексной травмой: встречайте, мы это сделали. ❓Почему дискуссионные вопросы? Я очень люблю обсуждения. Но в обучающих программах время обычно уходит на лекции и отработку техник, а сомнения и разногласие остаются за кадром. Здесь для них будет много места. Информационная часть т…

❤51🔥31👍8👏5

11 Sept 2026, 07:02 UTC≈6,770 views190 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Рекомендации психиатров, имеющих опыт помощи людям с кПТСР Мне часто пишут лично с просьбой посоветовать психиатра, работающего с кПТСР. КПТСР не лечится только медикаментозно - но психиатр может помочь с состояниями, сопровождающими комплексную травму: с тревогой, депрессией, нарушениями сна, выраженной эмоциональной нестабильностью. Я, к сожалению, из личного опыта никого безоговорочно посоветовать не могу. Но ес…

❤131👍31🔥28

5 Sept 2026, 08:00 UTC≈9,160 views498 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Posted without readable text

❤311💔108🔥48👍19🤝8👏4

13 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC≈9,500 views346 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Posted without readable text

❤220🔥80👍29💔17

15 Jul 2026, 17:52 UTC≈10,800 views348 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Противоречивая информация о тираже и продажах книги о кПТСР от Fresh Verlag. Ищу юриста в Германии Коротко: от издательства Fresh Verlag (русскоязычное оппозиционное издательство, находится в Германии) в разное время я получала существенно различающуюся информацию о количестве напечатанных и проданных экземпляров моей книги. К моменту выплаты роялти издательство сообщило мне данные о тираже и продажах, которые были…

💔222😢79❤32🤔8🤝7

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @cptsd_suitecase. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@cptsd_suitecase edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
21 August 2026
Most recent edit
21 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“кПТСР: чемодан с текстами” (@cptsd_suitecase), 11,808 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cptsd_suitecase.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.