Channel
@githubtrending
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
11,258subscribers
+71 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001080389054 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @githubtrending |
| Created | 27 November 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/githubtrending |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:06 | 11,258 | +8 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:32 | 11,250 | +3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:46 | 11,247 | +14 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:20 | 11,233 | +14 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:42 | 11,219 | +16 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:01 | 11,203 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:44 | 11,201 | +14 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:36 | 11,187 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:31 | 11,187 | first reading |
36 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 22 of 36 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 36 (29 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 18,877 |
| Reactions total | 27 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 04:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
26 reactions across 18 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 15 | 57.7% | |
| ❤ | 11 | 42.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#rust Switchyard is a Rust proxy and library for LLM traffic that lets coding agents keep using their normal OpenAI or Anthropic API while requests are routed to different model backends and translated as needed. It can also split traffic for testing, measure latency and errors, and use custom routing rules, which helps you run or compare models more easily without changing your agent setup. https://github.com/NVID…
👍2❤1
#python #cactus #gemini #gemma #llm #on_device_ai Needle 2 is a very small tool-calling AI model that can run on low memory, work offline, and return structured results like JSON instead of free text. It helps you build apps that call tools, extract data, and fine-tune models more safely and easily, even on devices with limited RAM. https://github.com/cactus-compute/needle
#python #ai_agent #aippt #office #powerpoint #powerpoint_generation #ppt #pptx #presentation #slide #slides PPT Master is a free, open-source tool that turns PDFs, DOCX files, web pages, or text into a real, editable PowerPoint with native shapes, charts, tables, animations, and speaker notes. You run it locally with an AI tool, so your files stay on your machine and you avoid platform lock-in. The benefit to you is…
#rust #agent #ai #ai_agents #all_in_one #crm #crm_system #email #linear #mcp #messaging #notes #notion #office #rust #slack #slack_alternative #startup #startup_tools #typescript #workspace Macro is an all-in-one workspace for teams that combines email, chat, docs, tasks, CRM, calls, and agents in one fast place, with shared team memory and links between everything. The benefit for you is less app-switching, faster …
#kotlin #agent #agentic_ai #agents #ai #ai_agents #aiagentframework #genai #generative_ai #java #kotlin #llms #multi_agents #multi_agents_orchestration #multi_agents_system #spring Embabel is a Java and Kotlin framework for building AI agents on the JVM with Spring, using typed goals, actions, and conditions instead of hard-coded prompt chains. It plans and replans at runtime, which helps you build more flexible, te…
#html This tool helps you make clean, branded diagrams fast, with 27 diagram types and no need for Figma or design guesswork. It can read your website, copy your colors and fonts, and turn them into diagrams in about 60 seconds, so you save time and get visuals that match your brand. https://github.com/cathrynlavery/diagram-design
#typescript Paperclip is an open-source tool that helps you manage many AI agents like a company, with goals, roles, budgets, approvals, and audit logs. It lets you assign work, track costs, prevent runaway spending, and watch agents run from one dashboard, which saves time and gives you better control over automated work. https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip
❤4
#c_lang Dopamine is a semi-untethered jailbreak for iOS 15 to 26(.0.1) https://github.com/opa334/Dopamine
#python Harvey LAB is an open-source benchmark that tests how well AI agents can do real legal work, not just answer legal questions. It gives each agent instructions, case documents, and a required work product, then scores the result with expert rubrics. LAB includes more than 1,200 tasks across 24 legal practice areas. This helps you compare models, check agent quality, and build better legal AI tools with a real…
👍2❤1
#python #ai #ast #claude_code #code_analysis #code_understanding #codebase_search #developer_tools #graph_database #knowledge_graph #llm #mcp #mcp_server #memgraph #monorepo #multi_language #python #rag #retrieval_augmented_generation #semantic_search #tree_sitter Code-Graph-RAG is an open-source tool that reads a codebase, builds a graph of functions, classes, modules, and links, and lets you ask questions, find co…
👍1
#other This repo gives 151 real DevOps, SRE, and cloud interview write-ups from 85 companies, with questions on Kubernetes, Docker, Terraform, AWS, Azure, GCP, CI/CD, Linux, scripting, and SRE basics. It helps you study smarter by searching for a company or role, comparing many interview styles, and spotting common topics before your interview. https://github.com/litu54/DevOps-Interview-Guide
#typescript Prime Agent is an open-source coding and research tool for long jobs. It uses a persistent Python workspace, built-in subagents, and saved memory so work can keep going across breaks. You can install it on macOS or Linux, start it in a project folder, and use it to run commands, edit files, and keep goals active. This helps you save time, keep progress, and handle bigger tasks with less manual work. htt…
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @githubtrending. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 798,301 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GitHub Trends” (@githubtrending), 11,258 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/githubtrending.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.