International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
37 measurements spanning 62 days, net -566. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,938–19,674 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 37
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Oct 2026, 17:21
19,023
-29
4 Oct 2026, 03:35
19,052
-95
25 Sept 2026, 13:00
19,147
-45
18 Sept 2026, 23:55
19,192
-16
16 Sept 2026, 18:18
19,208
-8
14 Sept 2026, 17:57
19,216
-19
13 Sept 2026, 03:18
19,235
-17
11 Sept 2026, 07:36
19,252
-31
8 Sept 2026, 12:00
19,283
-17
5 Sept 2026, 03:00
19,300
-25
3 Sept 2026, 12:21
19,325
-11
2 Sept 2026, 09:23
19,336
-10
1 Sept 2026, 08:37
19,346
-9
31 Aug 2026, 11:23
19,355
-11
30 Aug 2026, 14:55
19,366
-7
29 Aug 2026, 16:03
19,373
-3
28 Aug 2026, 16:46
19,376
-12
27 Aug 2026, 15:37
19,388
-14
26 Aug 2026, 13:49
19,402
-14
25 Aug 2026, 15:25
19,416
first reading
Engagement
273 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 273 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
42m 16s
Average length
35s
Measured directly from 73 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
12,354 reactions across 273 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🎉
1,790
14.5%
😁
1,766
14.3%
🤬
1,464
11.9%
🫡
1,275
10.3%
👍
1,255
10.2%
🥴
1,032
8.35%
👏
879
7.12%
❤
745
6.03%
🤔
484
3.92%
🔥
333
2.70%
😱
278
2.25%
😡
230
1.86%
🏆
148
1.20%
🤯
108
0.874%
😢
104
0.842%
😨
67
0.542%
👀
66
0.534%
💯
60
0.486%
👌
56
0.453%
👻
50
0.405%
9 further kinds
164
1.33%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 273 of the 273 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,354 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 273 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
¿Cuántas veces dijo Netanyahu que Irán estaba a dos semanas de producir una bomba nuclear?
Respuesta: como 50 veces...
¿Cuántas veces dijo que iba a derrocar al régimen iraní?
Respuesta: muchísimas veces. incluso Trump le creyó y lanzaron una guerra de dos contra uno el 28 de febrero. Una guerra de 40 días, y no pudo derrotar a Irán. En cambio, Israel quedó muy destruido.
Lo que quiere este demonio es crear una n…
🚨🇮🇱 El engendro de Satanás ha hablado:
"El régimen en Irán caerá. Lo derribaremos. Ya está al borde del colapso.
Todos nuestros sistemas, bajo mi dirección, actúan para derrocar a este régimen."
🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷🇹🇭 INFORME: El portaaviones USS Abraham Lincoln llega a Tailandia, mostrando signos evidentes de desgaste y óxido.
Después de más de 9 meses en el mar, con la tripulación agotando sus raciones y suministros y experimentando decenas de intentos de suicidio, el USS Abraham Lincoln ha regresado al puerto en Tailandia.
🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 INFORME: Una mina detonó en el Estrecho de Trump... 😟
Un petrolero explotó después de chocar con una mina naval en el "Estrecho de Ormuz" el día 30 de agosto, causando la muerte de dos miembros de la tripulación.
🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 Donald Trump en Truth Social:
"Ahora que lo tenemos bajo control de los Estados Unidos, ¿deberíamos cambiar el nombre del Estrecho de Ormuz a ESTRECHO DE TRUMP??? Como Estados Unidos mismo, sería "más importante" que nunca. Gracias por su atención a este asunto. El presidente DONALD J. TRUMP"
🚨🇮🇷🇺🇸 INFORME: Imágenes satelitales de los impactos en la base de la Quinta Flota de EE. UU. en Bahréin.
La página "Intel Observer" de Egipto publicó imágenes de los impactos de drones Shahed iraníes en la base de la Quinta Flota de EE. UU.
Analizando estas imágenes, la página escribió: "Se observan quemaduras recientes en un almacén ubicado dentro de esta base, en las coordenadas 26 grados 12 minutos 34,38 segundo…
🚨🇮🇷🇺🇸 INFORME: Izadi: Responderemos a cualquier movimiento del enemigo.
Subcomandante en jefe del Cuerpo de Guardianes de la Revolución Islámica:
"Estamos completamente preparados para enfrentar al enemigo y, confiando en nuestras capacidades de misiles y drones, responderemos con firmeza a cualquier movimiento hostil."
🚨🇮🇷🇺🇸 INFORME: Imágenes de la casa residencial en Irán que albergaba una boda y que fue blanco de los misiles del ejército estadounidense, dejando un mínimo de 5 muertos y varios heridos, incluidos niños.
No les bastó con asesinar más de 160 niños en la escuela de Minab, ahora EE. UU. bombardea bodas.
Showing the 12 most recent of 273 posts we hold for @codigoocultocom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@codigoocultocom edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
15 August 2026
Most recent edit
23 August 2026
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 3 October 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Enigmas y misterios del mundo @ConspiracionESP · 30,580 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 6 September 2026
UFO - OVNI #proyectoalphacrucis III @OVNIUFO · 39,041 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 6 September 2026
La Biblioteca de Alejandría @La_Biblioteca_De_Alejandria · 64,906 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 29 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CODIGO OCULTO - Canal” (@codigoocultocom), 19,023 subscribers as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/codigoocultocom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.