Voice message, posted without a caption

Channel
CA PARVEEN JINDAL FINAL FR
@caparveenjindal
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
26,193subscribers
-557 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001167938522 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @caparveenjindal |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 55 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/caparveenjindal |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 08:41 | 26,193 | +3 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 05:47 | 26,190 | +2 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 05:50 | 26,188 | -9 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 02:56 | 26,197 | -6 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 03:35 | 26,203 | -7 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 06:59 | 26,210 | +3 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 03:07 | 26,207 | -9 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 02:31 | 26,216 | -6 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 22:49 | 26,222 | +1 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 22:21 | 26,221 | +3 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 23:50 | 26,218 | +5 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 02:54 | 26,213 | +1 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 01:07 | 26,212 | +27 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 19:49 | 26,185 | -11 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 17:07 | 26,196 | -11 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 20:26 | 26,207 | -7 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 20:27 | 26,214 | -10 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 21:27 | 26,224 | -4 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 18:27 | 26,228 | -9 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 15:55 | 26,237 | first reading |
Engagement
46 posts held, back to 12 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 135 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 25.9%
- avg views ÷ 26,193 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 6,790
- 7 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 7
- of 46 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 46 (12 April 2026 – 3 November 2026) |
| Views total | 47,550 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Nov 2026, 05:55 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
Voice note for Study material May 27 New one
File, posted without a caption
How was today's Paper
- Hard14%
- Medium67%
- Easy23%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🙈🙈🙈🙈🙈🙈🙈🙈🙈🙈 Dear students of CA FINAL & INTER…SM FOR MAY 27 exams has been released by ICAI on its PORTAL….will share videos on newly added questions soon just after Diwali Aapka Adyapak Parveen Jindal
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.pjclasses.lms
CA FINAL NOV 26 EXAMS MTP- 2 of CA Final FR Video is uploaded on Mobile App, LMS and Google Drive..
Dear Students Nov 26 RTP AND MTP1 ARE also available on LMS BUTTON OF OUR WEBSITE and IN LAST FOLDER OF UR GOOGLE DRIVE if u face any problem in watching these videos from our APP
CA FINAL NOV 26 MTP 1...NEW PATTERN FOR PAPER.. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.pjclasses.lms UPLOADED ON GOOGLE DRIVE LAST FOLDER....LMS WEBSITE....MOBILE APP
CA FINAL NOV 26 RTP UPLOADED ON APP AND LMS ON WEBSITE https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.pjclasses.lms Q14 IND AS 109...ICAI NE NASHA CHAAT KE BNAYA HAI..ITS A MUST WATCH
Photo, posted without a caption
Follow it for exam purpose....
Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @caparveenjindal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 3 posts on @caparveenjindal as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 24 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 25 October 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 6 days
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 2
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
How was today's Paper
- Hard14%
- Medium67%
- Easy23%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
How was FR PAPER????
- Hard16%
- Medium69%
- Easy19%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 12 April 2026 to 3 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@air1ca · 157,253#1
@BBSIRDT · 207,580#2
@cainterparveenjindal · 17,749#3
@carajkumargstclasses · 9,231#4
@canotes_final · 50,581#5
@SSEIDirect · 28,765#6
@caonly · 6,070#7
@Vacanciyappaofficial · 4,677#8
@CAKapilGoyalAuditNotes · 26,596#9
@CAFinalAuditNotes · 10,305#10
@AadityaJainBestCACSCMAGroupIndia · 12,066#11
@aakashkandoi_FR · 110,286#12
@CA_Law_HarshGupta · 44,455#13
@auditwithkapil · 53,138#14
@CaRocksFinal · 1,009 (as read 12 September 2026)#15
@cawithme25 · 3,234#16
@akshanshgarg · 42,772#17
@DTwithCAShirishVyas · 6,305#18
@chartered_studies · 101,567#19
@cafinalsankalpcosting · 56,785#20
@thinkequity1 · 1,919#21
@BeyondCA_BAK · 3,990#22
@carahulgargrsa · 30,801#23
@cafinal2024 · 10,452#24
@CARishabhJain · 71,069#25
@Mission_CA_Final · 24,214#26
@CAShubhamGuptaAIR10 · 2,135#27
@TheIIFAR · 3,157#28
@allabouttaxes · 3,442#29
@vaibhav_bansal_ca · 5,451#30
@reclusecafinal · 3,822#31
@cafinalVM · 12,234#32
@ClearCAWithSK · 118,998#33
@Cats_housewtf · 7,148,692#34
@primeleak808 · 936#35
@moneywithmind04 · 847#36
@navi_classes · 1,355#37
@CAlegendsofficial · 4,211#38
@ranjitoptions · 2,053#39
@LAGAAN11Harish · 2,879#40
@cacmainterfmnotes · 1,251#41
@marketlatestupdate · 954#42
@airdropbasics · 715#43
@Jobs4CA · 44,098#44
@catapult_extreme · 7,693,976#45
@cryptogg · 102,224#46
@Gstpanacea · 3,685#47
@shreetech1004 · 3,119#48
@dogs · 6,506,149#49
@notcoin · 7,937,335#50
@hamster_kombat · 19,776,658#51
@allprimesleak · 390#52
@premiumleaker · 4,965#53
@blumcrypto · 12,948,227#54
@durov · 10,135,173#55
@Team_Six_T6 · 4,841#56
@Jackpotipscalls · 1,072#57
@mahadev_trader · 1,043#58
@longshotassignments · 2,303#59
@Fantasy_Yatra_Teamsss · 2,590#60
@cpimllib · 1,518#61
@redmik20proupdates · 14,473#62
@Major_Dominates · 3,411#63
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@canotes_final · 50,581
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 25 August 2026
@SSEIDirect · 28,765
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 September 2026
@CAKapilGoyalAuditNotes · 26,596
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 September 2026
@ClearCAWithSK · 118,998
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 August 2026
@air1ca · 157,253
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
@BBSIRDT · 207,580
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 19 August 2026
@cafinalsankalpcosting · 56,785
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
@aakashkandoi_FR · 110,286
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CA PARVEEN JINDAL FINAL FR” (@caparveenjindal), 26,193 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/caparveenjindal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.