3 measurements spanning 4 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,190–3,201 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
23 Aug 2026, 00:12
3,200
+8
19 Aug 2026, 23:24
3,192
+1
19 Aug 2026, 06:31
3,191
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 10 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
32.7%
avg views ÷ 3,200 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,050
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.139%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held
20 (10 April 2026 – 8 August 2026)
Views total
4,182
Reactions total
5
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
19 Aug 2026, 06:31 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
48 reactions across 15 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
29
60.4%
👍
13
27.1%
💯
4
8.33%
🙏
2
4.17%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 April 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A student had an exemption in May 2023 CA Final exam. He surrendered his exemption after claiming once in Nov 2023. Now after 3 attempts i.e. from May 2025 Exam, can he carry that exemption again as permanent exemption?
Yes38%
No62%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
ICAI Examination Department 📅 30 July 2026
Surrender of Exemption
____
Important Announcement 📢
The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India has introduced an on-line facility to apply for the surrender of exemption obtained (including Permanent Exemption) 🔄.
This on-line facility aligns with our continuing commitment to improve the examination process, making it more accessible to the candidates. Candidates wh…
Pressure hoga 🌪️
Stress hoga 😓
Kabhi confidence bhi tootega 💔
Lekin yaad rakho 🧠
Pahad dekh kar rukne wale manzil tak nahi pahuchte 🏔️🚫
Stay calm 🧘♂️
Stay focused 🎯
Stay consistent ⏳
Kyo ki,
Koshish karne walon ki kabhi haar nahi hoti
✅RTI Application all info.
1. Difference between RTI & ICAI route
2. Steps for RTI Application
3. Format and steps
4. Fees
5. MCQs Re evaluation
6. Declaration form [Edit as per application type]
7. ReCHECKING
8. RTI Act, 2005
9. Any Other info
P.S.- [A small correction] Marks can only be increased or remain the same through any route, can't be deducted, once given.
Today is not just a day to celebrate our degrees 🎓. It is a day to remember our deep responsibility to our country 🇮🇳.
Never swap your long-term reputation for a short-term gain 📉.
When a CA is honest, the entire financial system stays safe and strong 🛡️. Never compromise with your values 💎.
Jai Hind! Happy CA Day! 🎉
❤6
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TheIIFAR. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
A student had an exemption in May 2023 CA Final exam. He surrendered his exemption after claiming once in Nov 2023. Now after 3 attempts i.e. from May 2025 Exam, can he carry that exemption again as permanent exemption?
Yes38%
No62%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Can a student surrender a permanent exemption claimed?
Yes68%
No32%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 April 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
CA Final Notes ✅ @canotes_final · 50,646 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 25 August 2026
CA Rohit Chipper AIR 17 @carohitchipper · 43,256 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 28 August 2026
CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI - Final FR/AFM @bhavikFRSFM · 42,474 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 August 2026
CA Aakash Kandoi - FRWITHAK @aakashkandoi_FR · 105,169 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 19 August 2026
AIR1CA Guidance & Notes - By Atul & Ajay @air1ca · 154,378 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
CA Yash Khandelwal-Direct Tax @yashkhandelwaldt · 45,148 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 August 2026
CA FINAL AFM & SCPM BY CA SANKALP KANSTIYA @cafinalsankalpcosting · 55,867 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
PRATIK JAGATI FR & AFM @pratikjagati · 56,362 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 23 August 2026
FinTaxPro @fintaxpro · 40,988 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 30 August 2026
EDU91 @neerajaroraclasses · 51,605 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 August 2026
CA Hemant somani | AIR 46 @cahemantsomani · 46,051 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 August 2026
CA Harsh Gupta (HG Virtuals)⚖️ @CA_Law_HarshGupta · 42,546 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 August 2026
Bhanwar Borana (BB)- Direct Tax @BBSIRDT · 203,234 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 19 August 2026
Clear CA with Shubham Keswani @ClearCAWithSK · 113,403 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ICAI-Interesting Facts and Rules” (@TheIIFAR), 3,200 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheIIFAR.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.