12 measurements spanning 12 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,531–11,549 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
30 Aug 2026, 20:57
11,534
-2
29 Aug 2026, 21:19
11,536
-5
28 Aug 2026, 18:14
11,541
+6
27 Aug 2026, 17:53
11,535
-3
26 Aug 2026, 15:15
11,538
-6
25 Aug 2026, 14:37
11,544
-1
24 Aug 2026, 15:27
11,545
-2
22 Aug 2026, 22:09
11,547
+11
21 Aug 2026, 12:24
11,536
+3
20 Aug 2026, 13:05
11,533
-4
19 Aug 2026, 16:23
11,537
+2
19 Aug 2026, 06:31
11,535
first reading
Engagement
36 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
16.7%
avg views ÷ 11,534 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,930
36 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.198%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
36
of 36 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 26 of 36 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held
36 (6 August 2026 – 27 August 2026)
Views total
69,340
Reactions total
102
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
30 Aug 2026, 00:06 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
102 reactions across 23 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 95.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
97
95.1%
👍
4
3.92%
👏
1
0.98%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 102reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
While discussing appointment as auditor, Mr. A noticed that tcwg also involve as managing entity. Then after during the audit mgt impose the limitation on scope of auditor and refuse to remove.
Communicate to TCWG and determine possibility of alternative procedure to obtain SAAE33%
Determine possibility to perform additional audit procedure to obtain SAAE13%
To request WR from MGT for matters related to limitation and communicate to TCWG13%
Determine possibility to perform alternative audit procedure to obtain SAAE42%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Recorded amendment video (upload tomorrow)
Thodi badi h because tricky parts kaafi h amendment me
And ICAI 4-5marks ka question waha se puch sakta h
Detailed discuss kiya h with multiple examples
ICAl Exam Pattern Change
From Nov'26 & onwards,
CA Final paper pattern wiil have a change.
In MCQs (30 Marks),
earlier there were 15Q of 2 Marks each
Now,
7 Questions of 2 Marks=14 Marks
16 Questions of 1 Mark=16 Marks
In total, 30 Marks.
Does that mean MCQs will be easier? No way!
It means the ICAI wants to test conceptual points rather than rote learning. So, get a grip on the concepts, especially in Audit, befo…
SRE Series Questions | CA Final Audit | Question Bank Series| Nov'26 & Onwards
https://youtu.be/w7jxXYa2nBo
Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @cafinalVM. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
While discussing appointment as auditor, Mr. A noticed that tcwg also involve as managing entity. Then after during the audit mgt impose the limitation on scope of auditor and refuse to remove.
Communicate to TCWG and determine possibility of alternative procedure to obtain SAAE33%
Determine possibility to perform additional audit procedure to obtain SAAE13%
To request WR from MGT for matters related to limitation and communicate to TCWG13%
Determine possibility to perform alternative audit procedure to obtain SAAE42%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Auditor observe that there is material uncertainty related to GC in the company & mgt has future plan to overcome the situation. Mgt has only disclosed theevent that create material uncertainty in FS.
Unmodified Opinion10%
Unmodified Opinion with MURGC Para49%
Qualified with MURGC Para24%
Adverse Opinion4%
Qualified Opinion13%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 27 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
CA FINAL AFM & SCPM BY CA SANKALP KANSTIYA @cafinalsankalpcosting · 55,867 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
CA Rohit Chipper AIR 17 @carohitchipper · 43,256 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 28 August 2026
CA Yash Khandelwal-Direct Tax @yashkhandelwaldt · 45,148 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 August 2026
PRATIK JAGATI FR & AFM @pratikjagati · 56,362 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 23 August 2026
CA Final Notes ✅ @canotes_final · 50,646 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 25 August 2026
AIR1CA Guidance & Notes - By Atul & Ajay @air1ca · 154,378 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI - Final FR/AFM @bhavikFRSFM · 42,474 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 August 2026
CA Hemant somani | AIR 46 @cahemantsomani · 46,051 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CA Final Audit: CA Vikalp Gupta” (@cafinalVM), 11,534 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cafinalVM.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
