Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Te Atualizei Oficial

Channel

Te Atualizei Oficial

@canalteatualizei

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

31,197subscribers

-266 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001272061450
TypeChannel
Username@canalteatualizei
DescriptionCanal oficial - Te Atualizei - Dentre outras mil és tu Brasil oh pátria amada. 🇧🇷❤️👊🏻 Entre para a Família Te Atualizei: https://go.teatualizei.app/campaign/telegram-alt
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 August 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/canalteatualizei

Growth

31,19731,46331,3306 August 2026 — 31,463 subscribers6 August 2026 — 31,463 subscribers6 August 2026 — 31,455 subscribers7 August 2026 — 31,434 subscribers8 August 2026 — 31,415 subscribers9 August 2026 — 31,393 subscribers10 August 2026 — 31,361 subscribers11 August 2026 — 31,341 subscribers12 August 2026 — 31,321 subscribers13 August 2026 — 31,307 subscribers15 August 2026 — 31,261 subscribers16 August 2026 — 31,236 subscribers17 August 2026 — 31,213 subscribers18 August 2026 — 31,197 subscribers6 August 202618 August 2026
14 measurements spanning 13 days, net -266. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 31,157–31,503 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Aug 2026, 20:3331,197-16
17 Aug 2026, 19:2831,213-23
16 Aug 2026, 19:5431,236-25
15 Aug 2026, 06:4231,261-46
13 Aug 2026, 23:1531,307-14
12 Aug 2026, 15:1431,321-20
11 Aug 2026, 16:3831,341-20
10 Aug 2026, 13:4231,361-32
9 Aug 2026, 12:3331,393-22
8 Aug 2026, 15:4431,415-19
7 Aug 2026, 12:2431,434-21
6 Aug 2026, 13:2131,455-8
6 Aug 2026, 01:5131,463no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:5231,463first reading

Engagement

53 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.52%
avg views ÷ 31,197 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,660
53 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.72%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
53
of 53 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026
Posts held53 (29 July 202618 August 2026)
Views total140,840
Reactions total6,641
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken19 Aug 2026, 02:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,180
Videos
165
Links
1,350

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
5m 07s
Average length
2m 34s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

6,298 reactions across 50 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5,56088.3%
3365.34%
🔥3134.97%
👎270.429%
🤬270.429%
👏140.222%
🙏60.095%
😡50.079%
😢20.032%
😱20.032%
🤔20.032%
🤩20.032%
🎉10.016%
🥰10.016%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 53 of the 53 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,641reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 53 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @canalteatualizei. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 53 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 18 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

18 Aug 2026, 15:35 UTC≈1,290 views76 reactions1 Starread 19 August 2026

Você ficou abaixou a cabeça para o tirano ou ficou firme com Bolsonaro? Essa história também é sua! A equipe do Te Atualizei está produzindo um livro sobre a história do bolsonarismo — e o seu nome pode ser registrado nos agradecimentos dessa obra. Toque no link abaixo para receber os detalhes do projeto: https://go.teatualizei.app/campaign/sm-telegram-livro

👍76

18 Aug 2026, 15:35 UTC≈1,250 views80 reactionsread 19 August 2026

Se o Trump conseguiria pegá-lo de helicóptero. E a resposta do ministro da Defesa foi: "Até de Uber". E eu entendo essa preocupação do Lula, afinal, o Trump pegou Maduro na Venezuela e não sabemos se Maduro entregaria os companheiros para reduzir a própria pena. Agora me responda uma coisa: Enquanto o Lula voltava para destruir o Brasil com o apoio de certos ministros...

👍77🤩2🎉1

18 Aug 2026, 15:34 UTC≈1,230 views86 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

LULA CONFESSOU Galera, o Lula deve estar com o fiofó muito apertado... E como eu sei disso? Bom, segundo a reportagem, o déspota teria sugerido que os Estados Unidos poderiam agir para favorecer Flávio Bolsonaro. E aí me lembrei do Lula perguntando…

👍77🔥9

17 Aug 2026, 15:39 UTC≈1,970 views105 reactionsread 19 August 2026

Não é apenas contra bolsonaristas. Você já sabe que falar do déspota ou do A-lei-xandre é perigoso, mas sabia que, por isso, há vídeos meus que nunca foram para o YouTube? Além disso tem outro assuntos que eu tô proibida de falar 🤫. Então, tem coisas que você não vai me ver falando muito por aí... Mas que eu falo nos meus vídeos secretos no Te Atualizei. Libere o seu acesso a esse conteúdo tocando no link: https:/

👍1023

17 Aug 2026, 15:38 UTC≈1,890 views104 reactionsread 19 August 2026

Ignorado solenemente! Agora, ele protocolou diretamente na Presidência do STF, pedindo que Fachin afaste Moraes do processo. Como alguém seria imparcial julgando quem é acusado de atacar a própria família? Não é novidade. Juiz, vítima, promotor, delegado, perito, a coleção de papéis está completa há tempos. A diferença é que agora…

👍1031

17 Aug 2026, 15:38 UTC≈1,840 views109 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

O FUNDO DO POÇO Só para vocês entenderem o nível a que chegou o A-lei-xandre... A investigação comandada pelo Magnânimo chegou a um suspeito de ter comprado dados de Viviane Barci, esposa dele. O suspeito pediu a suspeição do ministro, o que qualquer manual de Direito manda fazer. Ninguém pode ser juiz de um caso em que a vítima mora na própria casa. E o pedido?

👍1052🔥2

15 Aug 2026, 16:51 UTC≈2,490 views124 reactionsread 19 August 2026

A verdade contada. Nos próximos dias, a equipe do Te Atualizei vai receber o texto final do livro que estamos escrevendo sobre a história do bolsonarismo. E o seu nome também pode estar contido nele! Garanta o seu tocando no link: https://go.teatualizei.app/campaign/sm-telegram-livro Essa oportunidade pode sumir a qualquer momento.

👍1204

15 Aug 2026, 16:51 UTC≈2,330 views130 reactionsread 19 August 2026

Republicanos e União Brasil têm políticos atingidos por investigações sobre emendas. O recado foi entendido: colou no bolsonarismo, o processo anda no STF. Isso tem nome: interferência eleitoral. O medo deles de o bolsonarismo vencer está bem nítido, né, Roberto Barroso?! Mas sabe outra coisa que coloca medo no sistema?

👍1255

15 Aug 2026, 16:50 UTC≈2,180 views139 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

SAIU NO JORNAL E QUASE NINGUÉM COMENTOU Três dirigentes de partidos perguntaram a ministros do STF se uma aliança com Flávio Bolsonaro poderia lhes trazer problemas. A resposta, segundo a matéria, foi sempre na linha do "melhor não". E eles recuaram. Será que o Fraquim vai se levantar como presidente da Corte ou deixará o Supremo afundar durante sua presidência? Porque, assim...

👍12510🔥4

14 Aug 2026, 20:57 UTC≈2,530 views112 reactionsread 19 August 2026

Pensando nisso, estamos produzindo um livro sobre a história do bolsonarismo, e o seu nome pode ser registrado nos agradecimentos desta obra histórica. Uma herança que a sua família vai guardar para sempre. ❤️ Já imaginou seus filhos e netos abrindo esse livro e vendo o seu nome registrado em um documento sobre a história do Brasil? Toca no link e saiba como tornar isso realidade: https://go.teatualizei.app/campai

👍1039

14 Aug 2026, 20:57 UTC≈2,310 views105 reactionsread 19 August 2026

Esperamos que outros jornalistas, artistas e influenciadores acordem… Já pensou se não fossem as redes sociais e dependêssemos apenas do que a mídia enfia goela abaixo? Agora, imagine se não tivermos os fatos reais registrados como dados históricos. Como nossos filhos e netos saberão o que vivemos?

👍1032

14 Aug 2026, 20:57 UTC≈2,190 views123 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

BRAZUELA CADA DIA MAIS SINISTRA 🚨 Seguindo o manualzinho da Venezuela, o síndico desse hospício jurídico, A-lei-xandre, coleciona mais poderes que o Thanos com as seis Joias do Infinito. E quem falou isso não fui eu… “Constranger jornalista em sua profissão é coisa de ditador”, Malu Gaspar, 2026.

👍1203

Showing the 12 most recent of 53 posts we hold for @canalteatualizei. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 229,432 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Nikolas Ferreira
@nikolasferreira · 196,266
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 16 August 2026
FLÁVIO BOLSONARO
@senadorflaviobolsonaro · 86,038
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
CARLOS BOLSONARO
@bolsonarocarlos · 111,398
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 August 2026
Jair M. Bolsonaro 1
@jairbolsonarobrasil · 1,089,861
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 16 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Te Atualizei Oficial” (@canalteatualizei), 31,197 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/canalteatualizei.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.