https://www.youtube.com/live/Pt5S4Kz3zdI?is=ovlIbipgOlPrrLTY
👍116👏39🤔1

Channel
@luizphilippe
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
21,310subscribers
-390 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001472794869 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @luizphilippe |
| Description | Canal oficial do deputado Luiz Philippe de Orleans e Bragança Formulário para conhecer melhor o perfil que me segue: https://forms.gle/bWpNDUoMhaBGA9M17 |
| Created | 9 April 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 36 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/luizphilippe |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 02:22 | 21,310 | -11 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 23:58 | 21,321 | -17 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 07:17 | 21,338 | -9 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 14:20 | 21,347 | -28 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 12:16 | 21,375 | -29 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 05:36 | 21,404 | -20 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 11:20 | 21,424 | -10 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 22:14 | 21,434 | +2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:53 | 21,432 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:27 | 21,435 | -15 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:54 | 21,450 | -6 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:48 | 21,456 | -26 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:38 | 21,482 | -13 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:52 | 21,495 | -4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 01:39 | 21,499 | -10 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:32 | 21,509 | -11 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 21,520 | -7 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:04 | 21,527 | -16 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 21,543 | -10 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 06:42 | 21,553 | first reading |
45 posts held, back to 12 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 45 (12 June 2026 – 25 September 2026) |
| Views total | 68,250 |
| Reactions total | 3,490 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 05:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 26 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
10,806 reactions across 43 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 5,430 | 50.2% | |
| 👏 | 5,004 | 46.3% | |
| 😡 | 196 | 1.81% | |
| 🤔 | 95 | 0.879% | |
| 🥰 | 58 | 0.537% | |
| 🤯 | 23 | 0.213% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,068 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://www.youtube.com/live/Pt5S4Kz3zdI?is=ovlIbipgOlPrrLTY
👍116👏39🤔1
Você pode concordar ou discordar. Mas precisa saber exatamente o que eu defendo.
👏184👍25🤔4🥰3
São Paulo não pode continuar mandando força política e recursos para Brasília e recebendo de volta dependência. Deputado federal foi eleito para representar seu estado — não para servir ao governo de ocasião. Quando a bancada paulista abre mão dessa função, quem perde são os municípios, os contribuintes e a população de São Paulo. Meu compromisso é claro: defender mais autonomia, mais equilíbrio federativo e os in…
👏175👍27😡1
Eu raramente trago minha fé para a política, mas hoje faço uma oração: que Deus me permita representar ideias maiores do que eu. A política virou disputa por fama e poder. Eu não quero representar pessoas. Quero representar princípios capazes de devolver liberdade ao Brasil. A mensagem é maior do que o mensageiro.
👏310👍43🥰13😡2🤔1
O julgamento do dia 15 coloca o STF diante de um dilema. Na minha avaliação, eles perdem dos dois lados. Se deixarem o processo tramitar, perdem. Se tentarem proteger os seus, também perde, e podem aprofundar ainda mais a perda de credibilidade diante de uma população que já está em ebulição. Acredito que, ao tentar ganhar tempo e evitar um desgaste maior, a Corte pode acabar produzindo justamente o efeito contrár…
👍220👏46🤔12😡2
https://www.youtube.com/live/asQYrFbzlvY?is=mDHxj6RZddO5c-6R Acompanhe minha participação na TV Celular, do senador Flávio Bolsonaro. 📺🇧🇷 Um papo direto sobre o Brasil, os desafios que temos pela frente e o que precisa ser feito para mudar de verdade.
👍132👏26🤔1
São Paulo tem uma liderança que entrega. Ao lado do governador Tarcísio, reafirmo aquilo que defendemos para o nosso Estado: gestão, responsabilidade, coragem para enfrentar problemas e resultado para quem trabalha e produz. Tarcísio mostrou que é possível governar com técnica, firmeza e compromisso. E São Paulo precisa continuar liderando as grandes mudanças que o Brasil exige. Temos muito a fazer: recuperar o pr…
👍159👏61🤔1
https://youtu.be/eB1GrU8HyNI?is=LBc1rydIOylL-6Bq
😡116👍55👏8
Esse é um recado para os *adultos* 👆
👏231👍49🤔1
O que estamos vendo não é apenas mais um escândalo isolado. Quando bilhões são desviados, é preciso perguntar como um esquema dessa dimensão consegue atravessar tantas estruturas do Estado sem que ninguém impeça. O caso envolvendo Daniel Vorcaro e as revelações que vêm surgindo precisam ser investigados com profundidade, transparência e responsabilidade. E, diante disso, não podemos aceitar que a estratégia seja aba…
👍225👏62😡6🤔2
Está chegando o nosso momento. 🇧🇷 O momento de nós, brasileiros, decidirmos que país queremos construir, que instituições queremos fortalecer e que tipo de Estado queremos para o futuro. A consciência brasileira está crescendo. A mobilização da sociedade está crescendo. E esse movimento mostra que o Brasil não está condenado a aceitar o caminho que escolheram por nós. É por isso que estou na política: para partici…
👍194👏56🥰11🤔1🤯1
Terras raras não podem ser tratadas como moeda de troca. A mesma empresa que agora negocia um acordo com uma empresa americana já havia firmado anteriormente um acordo com a China e, naquela ocasião, praticamente nada foi discutido. Isso deveria ser motivo de preocupação e, principalmente, de debate sério sobre os interesses estratégicos do Brasil. Estamos falando de terras raras, recursos fundamentais para tecnol…
👍186👏54🤔4
Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @luizphilippe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Luiz Philippe Oficial” (@luizphilippe), 21,310 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/luizphilippe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.