Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 41 days, net -211. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,194–9,469 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 05:41
9,226
-21
12 Sept 2026, 07:59
9,247
-17
8 Sept 2026, 05:37
9,264
-19
2 Sept 2026, 23:47
9,283
-7
31 Aug 2026, 08:23
9,290
-17
28 Aug 2026, 04:13
9,307
-13
25 Aug 2026, 04:43
9,320
-19
22 Aug 2026, 10:35
9,339
-24
18 Aug 2026, 17:45
9,363
-15
15 Aug 2026, 19:12
9,378
-21
12 Aug 2026, 04:02
9,399
-18
8 Aug 2026, 23:50
9,417
-19
6 Aug 2026, 02:50
9,436
no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:50
9,436
-1
6 Aug 2026, 00:56
9,437
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 17 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
21m 42s
Average length
1m 12s
Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,654 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👏
787
47.6%
👍
609
36.8%
❤
107
6.47%
🙏
86
5.20%
🤯
55
3.33%
🤣
5
0.302%
🤩
5
0.302%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,654 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 May 2026 to 10 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Na mesma semana, duas pesquisas. Cada uma com sua metodologia. As duas registradas na Justiça Eleitoral. As duas confirmam MORO a disparado na frente.
Isso é CONFIANÇA!
Na Paraná Pesquisas, MORO chega a 54,3% dos votos válidos. Muito a frente do candidato do PT e do candidato que só existe porque tem padrinho.
O povo paranaense quer LUZ PRÓPRIA, HONESTIDADE E BONS PROJETOS para que o próximo ciclo seja ainda melho…
Que noite histórica! Ontem, não foi apenas o PL, mas o Paraná inteiro que deu um show de união e força para corrigir os rumos do nosso estado. 🇧🇷
Muito obrigado pela presença e pelo apoio, @FlavioBolsonaro
! Vamos juntos! 🤜🤛
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DY9ogRiO3Qm/?igsh=MXR4MXlraWpqYjZ4Yw==
Curitiba, estamos chegando para mandar um recado para o Brasil: o tempo da esquerda e do PT chegou ao fim! Espero vocês às 18h30, no Jockey Club. Até lá!
@sf_moro
@deltandallagnol
@filipebarrosoficial
Curitiba será palco de um dos encontros políticos mais importantes do Paraná em 2026.
No dia 29 de maio, lideranças que marcaram a luta contra a corrupção, a defesa da liberdade e o enfrentamento ao sistema político tradicional estarão reunidas no lançamento das pré-candidaturas de Sergio Moro, Deltan Dallagnol e Filipe Barros.
O evento contará também com a presença confirmada do senador Flávio Bolsonaro, reforçand…
Se não fizermos nada para acabar com a impunidade, já sabemos quais figurinhas se repetirão nos próximos escândalos de corrupção!
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DYxBEw1x2wB/?igsh=MWp3bGdpYTdza3ppNg==
Marcha para Jesus 2026 em Londrina!
Juntos unidos proclamando que Jesus é o Senhor de Londrina, do Paraná e do Brasil!
#marchaparajesuslondrina
#londrina
#parana
❤58🙏19👍10
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @canaldepfilipebarros. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
3
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
3
vacant every time we have ever looked
@canaldepfilipebarros named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@filipebarrosoficial named in 5 posts, 8 August 2026 – 16 August 2026
@sf_moro named in 5 posts, 8 August 2026 – 16 August 2026
@flaviobolsonaro named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 16 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Bia Kicis Oficial @biakicisoficial · 29,426 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 8 September 2026
Carla Zambelli @carlazambellioficial · 53,374 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 24 August 2026
Luiz Philippe Oficial @luizphilippe · 21,310 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 24 September 2026
Eduardo Bolsonaro 🇧🇷 @depeduardobolsonaro · 61,098 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 22 August 2026
Gustavo Gayer @gusgayer · 30,733 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 6 September 2026
CARLOS BOLSONARO @bolsonarocarlos · 109,611 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 August 2026
Te Atualizei Oficial @canalteatualizei · 30,692 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 6 September 2026
FLÁVIO BOLSONARO @senadorflaviobolsonaro · 86,151 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Filipe Barros” (@canaldepfilipebarros), 9,226 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/canaldepfilipebarros.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
