Crio negócios, invisto no mercado, busco viver pelos valores cristãos. "O bem que o Estado pode fazer é limitado; o mal, infinito."
Mais conteúdos: https://leandroruschel.com.br/site-ruschel/
Created
9 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 51 days, net -558. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,862–29,588 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 04:37
28,946
-75
17 Sept 2026, 14:02
29,021
-22
15 Sept 2026, 10:21
29,043
-35
13 Sept 2026, 16:21
29,078
-2
11 Sept 2026, 17:58
29,080
-29
9 Sept 2026, 05:18
29,109
-18
5 Sept 2026, 20:17
29,127
-10
3 Sept 2026, 16:22
29,137
-2
2 Sept 2026, 06:09
29,139
-12
1 Sept 2026, 05:55
29,151
-13
31 Aug 2026, 05:26
29,164
-17
30 Aug 2026, 04:37
29,181
-8
29 Aug 2026, 05:53
29,189
-17
28 Aug 2026, 03:48
29,206
-9
27 Aug 2026, 05:42
29,215
-12
26 Aug 2026, 06:54
29,227
-12
25 Aug 2026, 04:05
29,239
-10
24 Aug 2026, 02:03
29,249
-28
22 Aug 2026, 08:06
29,277
-18
20 Aug 2026, 21:33
29,295
first reading
Engagement
324 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 71 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.74%
avg views ÷ 28,946 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,240
172 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.09%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
172
of 324 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held
324 (2 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total
385,515
Reactions total
31,169
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 06:45 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
415
Videos
71
Links
572
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
3h 51m
Average length
4m 13s
Measured directly from 55 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
62,867 reactions across 324 posts, in 61 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
14,650
23.3%
🤬
8,171
13.0%
🤡
7,961
12.7%
🤮
5,974
9.50%
💩
4,958
7.89%
🔥
4,844
7.71%
👏
3,087
4.91%
😈
2,754
4.38%
🤣
1,879
2.99%
😁
1,472
2.34%
🖕
1,427
2.27%
❤
1,061
1.69%
🙏
918
1.46%
🤔
808
1.29%
😡
465
0.74%
😢
422
0.671%
👌
316
0.503%
😱
273
0.434%
🤪
189
0.301%
🥱
154
0.245%
41 further kinds
1,084
1.72%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 324 of the 324 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 62,867 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 324 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
O governo regulamentou as bets, vendeu 85 licenças, arrecadou quase R$ 20 bilhões e, nove dias antes da eleição, proibiu tudo por medida provisória.
Está protegendo as famílias ou tentando salvar a própria candidatura?
Assista ao nosso Q&A da semana e entenda por que a cronologia da MP do Tigrinho pode ser o melhor retrato do desespero eleitoral de Lula:
https://youtu.be/b-cNLbOF1mw
Há mais de 20 anos, uma análise política duplicou meu patrimônio em poucos meses
Esta é a história do meu primeiro grande ganho no mercado:
https://leandroruschel.substack.com/p/ha-mais-de-20-anos-uma-analise-politica
Depois de liberar as bets, Descondenado proíbe a prática, a poucos dias das eleições.
Flávio Bolsonaro chamou corretamente de estelionato eleitoral.
Mais uma vez, fica claro que o regime está em desespero.
Meu artigo na Folha de S.Paulo mostrou o que a militância de redação não queria ver
Em janeiro de 2020, citei o inquérito ilegal de Toffoli e apontei a CPI das Fake News como instrumento para perseguir críticos das instituições. Você concorda com o texto?
https://leandroruschel.substack.com/p/meu-artigo-na-folha-de-spaulo-mostrou?r=1wqlqg&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true
Filho do Descondenado estava muito "guloso"... segundo a sócia lobista.
A pergunta que fica: por que o Lulinha ainda não teve a prisão decretada?
Se ele fosse filho do Bolsonaro, já estaria condenado à prisão perpétua.
Chiquinho Feitosa, ex-cunhado de Gilmar Mendes, manda mensagem para Vorcaro falando de um jantar com Gilmar e Zanin, afirmando que conversou "assuntos de nosso interesse".
Depois de Gonet blindar Moraes, o sistema agora opera para blindar Gonet.
É preciso entender que o sistema de justiça brasileiro COLAPSOU!
Seu único propósito, há tempos, é censurar e perseguir seus opositores.
https://x.com/EnioViterbo/status/2103484131178877427
Showing the 12 most recent of 324 posts we hold for @lruschel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Luiz Philippe Oficial @luizphilippe · 21,310 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 24 September 2026
Revista Oeste @revistaoesteoficial · 31,610 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 6 September 2026
CARLOS BOLSONARO @bolsonarocarlos · 109,208 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 August 2026
Jornal da Cidade Online @jornaldacidadeonline · 30,433 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 7 September 2026
Brasil Paralelo @brasilparalelooficial · 57,332 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 23 August 2026
Bia Kicis Oficial @biakicisoficial · 29,253 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 8 September 2026
Gustavo Gayer @gusgayer · 30,733 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 6 September 2026
Carla Zambelli @carlazambellioficial · 53,106 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 24 August 2026
Jair M. Bolsonaro 1 @jairbolsonarobrasil · 1,061,570 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 16 August 2026
FLÁVIO BOLSONARO @senadorflaviobolsonaro · 86,293 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
Jovem Pan News @oficialjpnews · 45,955 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 27 August 2026
Prof. Danuzio Neto - OSINT, Geopolítica e Atualidades (Intel BR - News) @profdanuzioneto · 121,313 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 17 August 2026
Hoje no Mundo Militar - Canal @hojeno_mundomilitar · 90,212 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 17 August 2026
APOIO AO MARÇAL | FAZ O Ⓜ️ 2️⃣8️⃣ @MarcalPorSp28 · 74,305 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 19 August 2026
FreedomNews 🇺🇸🇧🇷🌎🌍🌏 @freedomnewsforyou · 30,232 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 7 September 2026
Te Atualizei Oficial @canalteatualizei · 30,575 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 6 September 2026
Eduardo Bolsonaro 🇧🇷 @depeduardobolsonaro · 61,098 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 22 August 2026
Minuto Touro de Ouro @minutoeconomico · 45,728 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 27 August 2026
O INFORMANTE @oinformanteof · 161,616 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 16 August 2026
Nikolas Ferreira @nikolasferreira · 192,070 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 16 August 2026
InfoMoney @infomoney_noticias · 93,714 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 16 August 2026
Padre Paulo Ricardo @padrepauloricardo · 61,622 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 23 August 2026
Telegram Brasil @TelegramBR · 115,462 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 16 August 2026
Ben Shapiro Gang @BenShapiroGang · 53,372 Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 24 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Leandro Ruschel” (@lruschel), 28,946 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lruschel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.