Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Leandro Ruschel

Channel

Leandro Ruschel

@lruschel

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

28,459subscribers

-1,045 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001361193770
TypeChannel
Username@lruschel
DescriptionCrio negócios, invisto no mercado, busco viver pelos valores cristãos. "O bem que o Estado pode fazer é limitado; o mal, infinito." Mais conteúdos: https://leandroruschel.com.br/site-ruschel/
Created9 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held63
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/lruschel

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

28,45929,50428,981.56 August 202610 November 2026
63 measurements spanning 96 days, net -1,045. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,302–29,661 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 04:0828,459-16
8 Nov 2026, 20:2128,475-23
7 Nov 2026, 12:0528,498-6
6 Nov 2026, 14:0828,504-23
5 Nov 2026, 13:2028,527-27
4 Nov 2026, 16:0128,554-11
3 Nov 2026, 14:5628,565-13
2 Nov 2026, 17:4428,578+5
1 Nov 2026, 20:5628,573-9
30 Oct 2026, 20:2128,582-11
29 Oct 2026, 17:0628,593-6
28 Oct 2026, 15:5628,599-5
27 Oct 2026, 17:0028,604-15
26 Oct 2026, 14:4528,619-47
25 Oct 2026, 17:2028,666-12
24 Oct 2026, 17:4728,678+2
23 Oct 2026, 17:5628,676-12
22 Oct 2026, 19:1628,688+3
21 Oct 2026, 14:5828,685-19
20 Oct 2026, 09:3528,704first reading

Engagement

1,071 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 159 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.30%
avg views ÷ 28,459 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,360
457 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.70%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
458
of 1,071 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held1,071 (2 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total1,079,463
Reactions total83,077
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 01:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
395
Videos
70
Links
564

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
6h 22m
Average length
3m 05s

Measured directly from 124 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

178,221 reactions across 996 posts, in 69 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍39,18022.0%
🤬23,64713.3%
🤡20,31511.4%
🤮13,4667.56%
🔥13,2767.45%
💩11,8696.66%
😈9,9265.57%
🤣9,3015.22%
👏8,9195.00%
😁5,7383.22%
🙏3,6462.05%
❤3,5131.97%
🖕3,1951.79%
🤔2,2801.28%
😡1,7280.97%
😢1,1200.628%
🍾1,0490.589%
🤪6040.339%
😱4960.278%
💯4430.249%
49 further kinds4,5102.53%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 998 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 178,221 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 14 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 458 posts held from the last 30 days (0.655%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 21:55 UTC≈1,300 views89 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

O Brasil vai virar Cuba? A esquerda tem a intenção, mas ainda não tem os meios Sócia minoritária do sistema, ela aposta no lento caminho para o fundo do poço: https://leandroruschel.substack.com/p/o-brasil-vai-virar-cuba-a-esquerda?r=1wqlqg&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true

🤡39😈26🔥10👍7👀4❤1🤬1😡1

11 Nov 2026, 16:50 UTC≈1,980 views79 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

O maior risco para o patrimônio dos brasileiros pode não ser um confisco à moda Collor. Pode ser o governo dificultar a saída de recursos do país. Aumento do IOF, desvalorização cambial e possíveis controles de capitais são riscos que precisam entrar no planejamento de qualquer investidor. Não estou dizendo que o colapso será imediato. O cenário mais provável é uma deterioração lenta e gradual da economia. Por iss…

👍65🔥11🤔2👏1

11 Nov 2026, 16:05 UTC≈2,100 views218 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

🤡

🤡155🤣36💩17👍5🔥2😈2❤1

11 Nov 2026, 14:31 UTC≈2,210 views245 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Fico em dúvida sobre qual é o menor QI. Da leitora da Folha que mandou essa mensagem para o jornal; ou do "jornalista" que resolveu publicá-la?

💩154🤡46🤪25👍9😈7😁2❤1😡1

10 Nov 2026, 21:54 UTC≈3,330 views185 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Fachin arquiva o inquérito das fake news, mas preserva sete anos de perseguição à direita Por que o estado de exceção se mantém e não há o que comemorar com o fim do “inquérito do fim do mundo”: https://leandroruschel.substack.com/p/fachin-arquiva-o-inquerito-das-fake

🤬126🤡28😈11👍8😡6💩5🙈1

10 Nov 2026, 18:43 UTC≈3,260 views247 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Dólar R$ 5,62. Faz o L!

🍾135🤬53🔥30👍10🤡10😈7❤1🙈1

10 Nov 2026, 18:14 UTC≈2,790 views262 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Lembrando, o diretor-geral da PF chegou a ser afasto por André Mendonça, e reconduzido ao cargo por Fachin. Agora, segundo Malu Gaspar, o diretor-geral mandou refazer relatório que expunha ligações umbilicais de ministros com Vorcaro, e exonerou os delegados responsáveis. Por muito menos do que já foi revelado nessa investigação, opositores foram presos e condenados a penas duríssimas. Até quando os ministros perm…

🤡136🤬66🤮21💩15😈12👍6🗿3😡2

10 Nov 2026, 18:03 UTC≈2,520 views96 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Florida... https://x.com/ABC/status/2120072077424148574

😱50👍29❤8🔥4😁2💯1🤔1🥰1

10 Nov 2026, 17:55 UTC≈2,560 views173 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Fachin arquivou o inquérito das fake news, mas os presos políticos continuam na cadeia, os exilados continuam longe de casa e as condenações seguem de pé. Se o Ato Institucional do Supremo acabou, por que o estado de exceção continua? Veja o que Fachin admitiu, o que ele preservou e o que ainda precisa acontecer para o Brasil voltar a ser uma democracia: https://youtu.be/cDTXFOUXxc8

👍74🤡49😈25🤬17💩7👏1

10 Nov 2026, 14:26 UTC≈3,000 views245 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Eles sabem que tudo isso é uma montanha de abusos e ilegalidades, e querem esconder do público.

🤬144👍38🤡32😈15🔥13❤1🍾1😁1

10 Nov 2026, 14:25 UTC≈2,980 views250 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Sorria, pagador de impostos. R$ 6 milhões em telefonia, com iPhone 18 Pro para senador e troca garantida a cada dois anos. Você sustenta essa farra.

🤡135🤬68😈28🖕12😡3💩2❤1👍1

10 Nov 2026, 13:06 UTC≈2,870 views150 reactionsread 12 November 2026

No Paraguai, um presidente caiu em 48 horas por causa de um banco quebrado. No Brasil, nem um processo contra ministro do Supremo consegue sair da gaveta. Em fevereiro, o Senado vai escolher entre ser Congresso ou cartório do regime, e o seu senador vai ter de escolher um lado. De que lado ele vai estar? Assista ao nosso vídeo de hoje e entenda por que essa votação secreta pode MUDAR o Brasil: https://youtu.be/dr…

🤬89👍40🤡8😈6❤2👀2👏1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 1,071 posts we hold for @lruschel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Luiz Philippe Oficial
@luizphilippe · 20,952
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 24 September 2026
Revista Oeste
@revistaoesteoficial · 31,318
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 6 September 2026
CARLOS BOLSONARO
@bolsonarocarlos · 109,284
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 August 2026
Jornal da Cidade Online
@jornaldacidadeonline · 30,298
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 7 September 2026
Brasil Paralelo
@brasilparalelooficial · 56,258
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 23 August 2026
Bia Kicis Oficial
@biakicisoficial · 28,484
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 8 September 2026
Gustavo Gayer
@gusgayer · 30,474
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 6 September 2026
Carla Zambelli
@carlazambellioficial · 51,449
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 24 August 2026
Jair M. Bolsonaro 1
@jairbolsonarobrasil · 1,028,371
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 16 August 2026
FLÁVIO BOLSONARO
@senadorflaviobolsonaro · 92,260
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
Jovem Pan News
@oficialjpnews · 44,519
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 27 August 2026
Prof. Danuzio Neto - OSINT, Geopolítica e Atualidades (Intel BR - News)
@profdanuzioneto · 123,104
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 17 August 2026
Hoje no Mundo Militar - Canal
@hojeno_mundomilitar · 88,986
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 17 August 2026
APOIO AO MARÇAL | FAZ O Ⓜ️ 2️⃣8️⃣
@MarcalPorSp28 · 71,998
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 19 August 2026
FreedomNews 🇺🇸🇧🇷🌎🌍🌏
@freedomnewsforyou · 30,774
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 7 September 2026
Te Atualizei Oficial
@canalteatualizei · 29,933
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 6 September 2026
Eduardo Bolsonaro 🇧🇷
@depeduardobolsonaro · 61,557
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 22 August 2026
Minuto Touro de Ouro
@minutoeconomico · 45,097
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 27 August 2026
O INFORMANTE
@oinformanteof · 163,332
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 16 August 2026
Nikolas Ferreira
@nikolasferreira · 238,530
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 16 August 2026
InfoMoney
@infomoney_noticias · 91,792
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 16 August 2026
Padre Paulo Ricardo
@padrepauloricardo · 60,325
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 23 August 2026
Telegram Brasil
@TelegramBR · 110,025
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 16 August 2026
Ben Shapiro Gang
@BenShapiroGang · 51,755
Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 24 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Leandro Ruschel” (@lruschel), 28,459 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lruschel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.