Channel
@burovdt
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,572subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001338267738 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @burovdt |
| Created | 25 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/burovdt |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:48 | 7,572 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:41 | 7,570 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:05 | 7,572 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:19 | 7,571 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:55 | 7,571 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 29 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (29 May 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 34,440 |
| Reactions total | 1,015 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,100 reactions across 22 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,274 | 60.7% | |
| 🔥 | 343 | 16.3% | |
| 💯 | 315 | 15.0% | |
| 👍 | 109 | 5.19% | |
| 👎 | 42 | 2.00% | |
| 🥱 | 17 | 0.81% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,100reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Впечатление Один из самых впечатливших меня за последнее время ресторанов - Ambassador Clubhouse: феноменальный по вкусами и гостеприимству, супер стильный ресторан индийской (пунджабской кухни). Сейчас их два - один в Лондоне, другой в Нью-Йорке. Я был в первом: ресторан достаточно большой, народу много, но, в целом, за неделю или полторы я забронировал его без особых сложностей. А сегодня смотрел видео на Eater …
❤26🔥9
Мику Джаггеру 83, Киту Ричардсу 82. Они выпускают новый альбом, и энергии там хоть отбавляй. Судя по книге последнего - законы природы на них вообще не работают. - Что делать будем? - Завидовать) Ну и заниматься духом, телом, здоровьем, питанием и умением фокусироваться. И слушать, конечно же. Очень жду, что Кит восстановится и мужчины все же поедут в тур. https://music.apple.com/gr/album/foreign-tongues/18959417…
🔥33❤19💯3
В 2008 году Зенит оглушительно вынес Рейнджерс на стадионе в Манчестере, это был один из самых эмоциональных дней в моей жизни на тот момент, особенно учитывая, что на стадионе я был в компании друзей вживую. Это было в мае. А уже в августе, если быть точным 27 числа, ожидался еще один матч - с Манчестер Юнайтед (тогда он был в хорошей форме, не то что последние годы). На ту игру я уже не поехал, хотя обладал огромн…
❤114🔥47👍14💯8
Запустили в ресторанах Мнацаканова «Юбилейное»
❤62🔥29👍5🥱1
Сделали классный коллаб к 25-летию ресторанов Арама Михайловича. Всегда с большим уважением. Ищите в Пробке, Мине и других проектах!
❤36
Правота Ну и продолжая вторую часть философских измышлений: считается, что правота - это такое универсальное благо. Кто прав, тот и молодец. Но это абсолютно не так: вот, например, пару лет назад у нас был проект (до сих пор есть), и там два партнера между собой поспорили так, что уже начали привлекать внешние силы для решения вопроса. И что самое интересное, оба были правы. Ну и что? Еще пара шагов и были бы разр…
❤49👍15💯11🔥1
Самоутверждение Когда мне было лет 25-27 я свою профессиональную идентичность (в своей голове) пытался строить на противопоставлении себя большим/другим игрокам. В периоды эмоционального максимализма это наверное ок. Но в последние годы меня интересует только то, что думают наши гости и наши сотрудники, ну и экономика разумеется. Очень меня удивляет когда взрослые состоявшиеся люди систематически строят свою репут…
❤86💯32🔥4🥱2
В эти выходные делаем доброе и светлое дело. А именно устраиваем большой пикник семьи Каневских, где отец и сын будут готовить вместе. Очень радуюсь этому, искренне считаю поколенческую связь отцов и детей одной из важнейших на свете. Суббота и воскресенье, веранда и двор Smoke BBQ Лодейнопольская, 5
❤68🔥20👍1
А кто лучше всех в стране учит отельному гостеприимству и навыкам? Интересует не заучивание стандартов, а именно обучение эмпатии, действиям, нестандартным ситуациям, работе с разными гостями. И именно в отелях. И речь не про чтение презентаций, а именно про полный цикл с проверкой знаний и дотачиванием на практике. А то глядишь, потребуется новую сферу освоить, хочется быть готовым)
❤34
Очарованность Продолжая тему HR в широком смысле этого слова, хочу сказать, что самая большая ошибка, которую обычно я допускал раньше (сейчас тоже, но сильно реже) - это излишний оптимизм. Приходит человек, смотрится разумно, говорит правильно, что-то делает и ты думаешь: о, наконец-то, то что надо. А потом как с вайбкодингом, с каждым днем энтузиазма становится все меньше. Однако период энтузиазма все равно длин…
❤54💯18🔥6👎4
Как я и говорил, Франция на этом турнире абсолютно не имеющая отношения к финалу сборная. Надеюсь, аргентинцы проедут англичан и турнир завершится триумфальным прощальным аккордом величайшего футболиста в истории человечества - Лионеля Месси. Больше чем этот итог, мне хочется увидеть только то, как Овечкин в следующем сезоне возьмет Кубок Стэнли и добьет все оставшиеся рекорды. И то, и то было бы высшей человеческ…
❤104👍47👎33🔥13💯7
Функция HR Раньше я думал, что никому нельзя делегировать продуктовую роль. Придумывать, докручивать и доводить до ума все мелочи - нужно самому. Сейчас я так не считаю, хотя у меня в жизни так и не получилось пока найти союзника/идеолога/продуктового лидера, кто понимал бы продукт на устраивающем меня уровне и был бы внутри компании. И все же я не сдаюсь и верю, что это возможно. Тем более в других бизнесах (не рес…
❤42🔥37💯20🥱1
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @burovdt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
В разгар сезона вы выберете
The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 177,763 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Буров // Дримтим” (@burovdt), 7,572 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/burovdt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.