10 measurements spanning 8 days, net +84. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,988–18,098 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 04:57
18,085
+2
12 Aug 2026, 21:40
18,083
+7
12 Aug 2026, 00:24
18,076
+9
10 Aug 2026, 22:36
18,067
+12
9 Aug 2026, 22:14
18,055
+13
8 Aug 2026, 18:51
18,042
+3
7 Aug 2026, 18:12
18,039
+22
6 Aug 2026, 20:48
18,017
+16
6 Aug 2026, 02:17
18,001
no change
5 Aug 2026, 18:57
18,001
first reading
Engagement
37 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
21.8%
avg views ÷ 18,085 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,940
37 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.27%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
37
of 37 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held
37 (29 July 2026 – 13 August 2026)
Views total
145,690
Reactions total
1,855
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Aug 2026, 09:55 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈5,250
Videos
≈1,400
Links
≈883
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
12h 17m
Average length
1h 32m
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,354 reactions across 30 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 97.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,319
97.4%
👎
35
2.58%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,855reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
عصر یکشنبههای بخارا
شانزدهمین نشست از سلسله نشستهای عصر یکشنبههای بخارا به نقد و بررسی کتاب «نظریۀ فروپاشی» (تحلیلی جامعهشناختیـ تاریخی از فروپاشی نظم سیاسی در ایران) نوشتۀ تقی آزاد ارمکی، که از سوی نشر فراهم منتشر شده، اختصاص یافته است. این نشست در ساعت پنج بعدازظهر یکشنبه بیست و پنجم مرداد ۱۴۰۵ با سخنرانی تقی آزاد برمکی، مقصود فراستخواه، علی جنادله ، رحیم محمدی و علی دهباشی در خانۀ کتاب دبا برگزار خواهد شد.
…
عصر سهشنبههای بخارا
نقد و بررسی کتاب «امپراتوری کودکی» (جلوههایی از زندگی و اندیشههای عبدالحسین وهابزاده) که از سوی انتشارات اندیشهورزان تربیت منتشر شده است
با حضور: دکتر حسن عشایری و دکتر شیوا دولتآبادی، و با سخنرانی: عبدالحسین وهابزاده، سیدمحسن گلدانساز، هادی صمدی، بهاره کیانی، مانیا شفاهی، محمدرضا سرکارآرائی (پیام تصویری) و علی دهباشی
سهشنبه بیستم مرداد ١۴٠۵
شهر کتاب نیاوران
چهارمین سالگرد درگذشت هوشنگ ابتهاج
با حضور دکتر شفیعی کدکنی
و با سخنرانی کامیار عابدی
همراه با پخش پیام تصویری یلدا ابتهاج، و اجرای موسیقی توسط نازلی بخشایش و حسین علیشاپور
دوشنبه، ۱۹ مرداد ۱۴۰۵
شهر کتاب نیاوران
عصر یکشنبههای بخارا
نقد و بررسی کتاب «استراتژی کلان ایران» تألیف دکتر ولی نصر، ترجمۀ حامد کاظمزاده و حسین قاجاری با موضوع تاریخ سیاسی نیم قرن اخیر ایران
با سخنرانی حبیبالله فاضلی، احمد بستانی، ولی نصر (ویدیویی) و علی دهباشی
یکشنبه هجدهم امرداد ۱۴۰۵
خانۀ کتاب دبا
عصر سهشنبههای بخارا
شصت و ششمین نشست از سلسله نشستهای عصر سهشنبههای بخارا به نقد و بررسی کتاب «امپراتوری کودکی» (جلوههایی از زندگی و اندیشههای عبدالحسین وهابزاده) که از سوی انتشارات اندیشهورزان تربیت منتشر شده، اختصاص یافته است. این نشست در ساعت پنج بعدازظهر سهشنبه بیستم مرداد ١۴٠۵ با حضور: دکتر حسن عشایری و دکتر شیوا دولتآبادی، و با سخنرانی: عبدالحسین وهابزاده، سیدمحسن گلدانساز، هادی صمدی، بهاره کیانی، …
چهارمین سالگرد درگذشت هوشنگ ابتهاج
به مناسبت چهارمین سالروز درگذشت امیرهوشنگ ابتهاج (ه. ا. سایه)، چهلوچهارمین نشست از سلسلهنشستهای عصردوشنبههای بخارا با همکاری نشر کارنامه و شهرکتاب نیاوران، اختصاص یافته است به بحثی در صورت و معنای شعر سایه با سخنرانی کامیار عابدی. پخش پیام تصویری یلدا ابتهاج، و اجرای موسیقی توسط نازلی بخشایش و حسین علیشاپور از دیگر بخشهای این مراسم خواهد بود.
همچنین کتابهای سایه که در نشر کا…
Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @bukharamag. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@bukharamag edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 6,702 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 21 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Behrouz Boroumand(en.wikipedia.org) “…magazine|Bukhara Magazine]]{{Cite web |title=Bukharamag |url=https://t.me/bukharamag/8280 |access-date=2024-01-07 |website=Telegram}}…” read 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bukharamag” (@bukharamag), 18,085 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bukharamag.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.