Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 58 days, net +1,776. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,346–19,687 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
3 Oct 2026, 17:19
19,417
+358
25 Sept 2026, 00:16
19,059
+236
18 Sept 2026, 21:58
18,823
+151
16 Sept 2026, 16:59
18,672
+194
13 Sept 2026, 06:02
18,478
-4
11 Sept 2026, 05:21
18,482
+167
8 Sept 2026, 09:18
18,315
+137
5 Sept 2026, 04:18
18,178
+31
3 Sept 2026, 09:46
18,147
-3
2 Sept 2026, 04:43
18,150
+8
1 Sept 2026, 06:49
18,142
+49
31 Aug 2026, 10:18
18,093
+52
30 Aug 2026, 07:57
18,041
+18
29 Aug 2026, 10:28
18,023
+63
28 Aug 2026, 07:26
17,960
+9
27 Aug 2026, 07:08
17,951
+3
26 Aug 2026, 10:24
17,948
+4
25 Aug 2026, 12:07
17,944
+29
24 Aug 2026, 14:28
17,915
+90
22 Aug 2026, 20:02
17,825
first reading
Engagement
205 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 205 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
10m 09s
Average length
1m 01s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
11,132 reactions across 203 posts, in 60 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
3,781
34.0%
❤
2,374
21.3%
🤣
1,826
16.4%
👍
1,113
10.00%
😁
498
4.47%
🥰
297
2.67%
✍
241
2.16%
👏
161
1.45%
😭
95
0.853%
🫡
92
0.826%
🐳
59
0.53%
🤪
55
0.494%
👻
54
0.485%
😱
40
0.359%
🏆
30
0.269%
🤩
27
0.243%
💯
25
0.225%
⚡
24
0.216%
🙏
22
0.198%
🥴
22
0.198%
40 further kinds
296
2.66%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 203 of the 205 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,132 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 205 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Aku dah tulis panjang sekali terdelete…
Nak tulis pasal AMD
Accumulation Manipulation Distribution
Dah hilang idea
Korang je lah tulis dan terangkan berdasarkan gambarajah diatas…
Tulis karangan mengenai AMD dan apa effect pada pergerakan Harga Gold semalam…(tak lebih 150 patah perkataan)
(50 markah)
Lepas tu hantar kat meja saya sebelum pukul 12 tghari..
Dilarang menggunakan ChatGpt…
Mana Round 1
Actually Round 1 ada kat bawah tu cuma x sempat atau lupa nak ambik ss
buy bawah sapot…ada sapot prrice break ko buy
Jadi fakeout…so price naik naik naik sebab ada fakeout
Geng TT ramai yg sell sebab Follow Trend Katanya..hahahaha
Kan aku dah cakap trend ni mitos sahaja…
Tapi diorang cakap Trend is Your Friend
No Bro ko silap
Trend is your Girlfriend
Semalam ko sedap sedap harini dia boleh curan…
Round 2 buy at Resistance
Kuang hajo mana ada org buy kat Resistance?
Eh suka hati aku lah nak buy kat resistance ke nak buy kat support
Ko tgklah kan Price kejar Liquidity…liquidity kat mana?
Liquidity banyak atas Resistance…so sebelum dia kejar aku tolong kejar sekali
Tu yg jadi buy Resistance… atau Breakout
Aduiiii pening aaa mana nak tahu dia akan jadi Breakout ke Fakeout…
Ohh senang jer…dia camni …see mo…
Macamana bentuk Be merah merah delima ?
Cs 1 dimakan oleh cs 2 kemudian price terjun ke bawah
Tak macam bentuk Bearish Engulfing pun?
Dia bukan masalah bentuk
Perkataan Engulfing tu pun maksud dia makan atas bawah
engulf…melampaui melepasi Melangkawi …
Apa yg dia makan
Shadow bukan body
Shadow cs 2 lebih tinggi dari shadow cs 1
Shadow cs 2 lebih rendah dari shadow cs 1
So dia ENGULF atas EnGulf bawah
So va…
Bearish E merah merah delima buat kerja lagi
Cuba perhatikan level yg saya marking tu
Kat situ ada zone entry zero Float …
Ada zone entry Tekan berdiri
Ada zone entry Pergi tak kembali
Sebab ada apa?
Ada be merah merah delima 🌶️🌶️
Tangis ini tanda kasih ku😥
Bukan mengeluh luka yang semalam
🤕
Kerna engkau mengasihi ku🌹🌹
Tiada sendu lagi di dunia ku ini🌏🌏🌏
Andai ku miliki semalam
Aku akan berterimakaih kasih kepada Allah kerana menguatkan aku dikala susah
Aku takkan ubah apa apa…
I am what I am..
This is me..as me
Luv your self
*Reason sell nak bagitahu ke?
Sell atas Resistance Tp bawah sapot…
Done Round 2
Malam ni tgk la kalau raj
Aku tgk live Tiktok dah macam org jual ubat ❌❌❌
Mari mari mari abg kakak pakcik makcik ‼️‼️‼️
Yang Jauh mari dekat 🔥
Yg Dekat mari Rapat 🌶️
Yg rapat mari sahabat🐊
Ini barang takda Obat❌❌❌
Kalau akak B tp atas bumbung
Kalau kakak S tp bawah meja ⌛️⌛️⌛️
Ini barang kalau kena…makan tak habis🔥🔥🔥
Sambil tunjuk Round entry dia semua profit
Dengar sini semua🔇🔇🔇
Yg viewer tak habis habis tanya soalan lazim
1. n…
Antara Channel yg saya Pin kan kat Tele saya…
1. Bangsa x Kanan ✅
By Cikgu Pablo…cikgu dia garang macam singa…kalau dia bad mood habislah kau kena maki…tapi bagi saya itu normal 👍👍
Lagi garang lagi bagus ‼️
Baru boleh belajar 🔥🔥🔥
Ini tak ❌ … budak budak noob sekarang masuk LIVE TT jer tanya Nak B ke nak S 😂😂😂
Kalau dulu tanya TF berapa Valid …sekarang tanya Nak B ke nak S 🧑✈️🧑✈️🧑✈️🧑✈️
Rasa nak tunjal tunja…
🤣55🔥35❤9😁6🗿2👍1🤡1🥰1
Signed Mansorsapari Aka Cms
Showing the 12 most recent of 205 posts we hold for @kingmastery. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@kingmastery edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
24 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
So Far Faham tak Teknik Fakeout? Buy bawah Support Sell atas Resistance..
Faham cikgu22%
Kepada Mansor Sapari saya buat jadikkkkk9%
Faham tapi masih takut takut nak guna30%
Tak faham saya nak masuk kelas38%
Faham tapi nak tanya satu soalan…TF berapa valid17%
The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 205 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 3 October 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Jawatan Kosong Seluruh Malaysia @JawatanMalaysiaTerkini · 34,490 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 2 September 2026
Hanzo Shadowcodes @shadowcodes · 21,395 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 24 September 2026
OFFICIAL BANGSA KANAN @Bangsa_Kanan · 530 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 26 August 2026
INTRADAY.my - Website Pasaran Kewangan No 1 di Malaysia @intradaydotmy · 45,461 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 27 August 2026
Komuniti SuamiSihat @suamisihat · 28,552 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 9 September 2026
Fahdi Ghazali @fahdighazali · 22,326 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 1 October 2026
Penduduk Sungai Petani (PSP) @inipsp · 21,591 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 22 September 2026
Market Demon @market_demon · 19,192 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 3 October 2026
Dato Dr Nazri Khan DDNK (Official) @DDNKTelegramOfficial · 27,753 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 10 September 2026
JAWATAN KOSONG MALAYSIA @jawatankosongMY · 35,198 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 2 September 2026
Ad-Dien Abdul Kadir @addien90 · 25,514 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 13 September 2026
Forex News | Fundamental @Forex_LiveStream · 103,000 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
Asri Ahmad Academy @AsriAhmadAcademy · 33,892 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 3 September 2026
BOBBY LIVETRADE @Bobbylivetrade · 91,509 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 22 August 2026
Majlis Keselamatan Negara (Rasmi) @mknrasmi · 615,952 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 13 August 2026
Firdaus Wong Wai Hung Telegram @brofirdauswong · 90,774 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 17 August 2026
Irfan _ Newboys News @Irfan_Newboys · 60,177 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Spiritual King Master” (@kingmastery), 19,417 subscribers as measured 3 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kingmastery.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.