Channel
@Sharingbynfam
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,158subscribers
-27 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001572804669 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Sharingbynfam |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Sharingbynfam |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:25 | 7,158 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 7,159 | -7 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:02 | 7,166 | -7 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:34 | 7,173 | -5 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 15:47 | 7,178 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:58 | 7,177 | -7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:51 | 7,184 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 7,185 | first reading |
48 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 29 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 48 (11 July 2026 – 20 August 2026) |
| Views total | 14,735 |
| Reactions total | 37 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 20 Aug 2026, 12:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
91 reactions across 23 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 44 | 48.4% | |
| 👍 | 39 | 42.9% | |
| 👌 | 5 | 5.49% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 2.20% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 1.10% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 48 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 91reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Semakin kantoi .. Penyokong Fauci diam lebih baik dari spin entah apa2 Satu perkembangan besar kes COVID-19 dari mahkamah US.Dr. David Morens, bekas penasihat kanan kepada Dr. Anthony Fauci, secara rasmi telah mengaku bersalah atas pertuduhan konspirasi menipu Amerika Syarikat. Mengikut dokumen mahkamah, beliau mengaku berkomplot dengan pihak luar untuk memadam dan menyembunyikan rekod-rekod persekutuan berkaitan g…
Sebab Kesannya Perlahan, Kita Ingat Ia Tak Wujud Bukan semua yang cucuk hari ni, esok terus sakit atau mati. Kalau semudah tu nak nampak kesannya, dah lama orang persoal. Dah lama benda ni berhenti. Dan di situlah masalahnya. Yang datang cepat, kita akui. Yang datang bertahun kemudian, kita cari sebab lain. Kata genetik. Kata makanan. Kata memang dah takdir. Betullah tu. Tapi langsung tak nak salahkan yang satu t…
👍1
Kepada mak ayah yang sampai sekarang masih pening nak sign atau tak Surat Aku Janji untuk anak sekolah tu kan… Kalau tanya saya, kalau saya berada di tempat korang saya memang takkan sign selagi benda yang saya persoalkan tak dijelaskan dengan terang. Simple. Kenapa nak paksa diri sign sesuatu yang kita sendiri masih ragu2 dan tak faham sepenuhnya implikasi dia? Lagi saya baca, lagi saya rasa surat ni ada banyak b…
Sebenarnya Bukan Kita Yang Melawan Arus Setiap kali kita pilih jalan yang berbeza, mesti ada yang kata kita melawan arus. Tapi cuba fikir balik. Siapa sebenarnya yang melawan? Kita makan makanan yang tumbuh dari tanah dan diproses sesedikit mungkin. Itu cara manusia makan selama ribuan tahun. Yang baru tu makanan yang direka dalam kilang, penuh pewarna dan perasa yang lidah kita tak pernah kenal sebelum ni. Kita …
❤4👌1
Kenapa Kita Berhenti Mencari? Kepada yang sedang sakit dan cuba satu cara je, saya nak tanya satu benda. Kenapa tak pernah terfikir nak cuba cara lain? Bukan nak gantikan. Cuma kenapa kita rasa ikhtiar tu ada satu pintu je? Cuba fikir balik. Sebelum wujud sistem perubatan moden yang baru lebih kurang lebih seratus tahun ni, manusia hidup, sakit, dan sembuh juga. Mereka berikhtiar dengan apa yang ada. Ilmu yang d…
❤2
Selain vaksin; kita sebenarnya diserang pelbagai penjuru. Antara sedar dengan tak je. Sebab tu kalau sedar kena usaha untuk elak semaksimum yang mungkin. Apa yang kalian dah cuba elak? https://www.facebook.com/share/p/19cqNxFTPe/?mibextid=wwXIfr
❤1
Kemudian menyalahkan mereka atas masalah yang jauh lebih besar dari kemampuan mereka. Kemudian mencadangkan mereka dinafikan hak yang orang lain nikmati. Corak ni berulang dalam sejarah manusia. Cari satu kumpulan kecil, jadikan mereka punca segala masalah, dan orang ramai akan bersorak. Sebab menyalahkan satu golongan tu jauh lebih senang dari menghadapi masalah sebenar. Hospital sesak sebab kekurangan kakitangan, k…
Cadangan Yang Mendedahkan Kebenakan Sendiri Ada yang cadangkan, untuk kurangkan kesesakan di hospital dan klinik kerajaan, halang antivaksin dari datang. Halau mereka pulang. Suruh balik minum madu. Jom kita check cadangan ni satu-satu. Pertama, matematik yang tak menjadi. Nak kurangkan sesuatu, maknanya benda tu mesti banyak dulu. Jadi cuba jawab. Sejak bila majoriti pesakit di hospital dan klinik kerajaan tu golo…
Bila Produk Dipertahankan Macam Akidah Persoalkan jenama kereta, orang balas dengan data. Persoalkan telefon, orang tunjuk spesifikasi. Persoalkan yang satu ni, tiba-tiba kau jadi ancaman kepada masyarakat. Kenapa reaksinya berbeza? Sebab benda ni dah lama berhenti jadi soal perubatan. Ia dah naik jadi soal kepercayaan. Dan bila sesuatu dah jadi kepercayaan, ia jadi kebal. Tak boleh disoal. Tak boleh dikaji sem…
Sihir moden hanya perlukan botol dan jarum yg ditonjolkan atas nama “penyelamat” walhal bahan2 nya ada banyak persamaan dengan sihir purba. Yang terkena sihir ni susah nak sedar. Siap promote dan taksub ada la. Tahniah pd yg dh sedar👏 Ulangkaji sikit 1. https://www.facebook.com/share/1Z4MhB5Ge7/?mibextid=wwXIfr 2. https://www.facebook.com/share/1Jbcofy5pm/?mibextid=wwXIfr 3. https://www.facebook.com/share/1WrV113…
❤1
Satu Persatu Tirai Terbuka Dulu sesiapa yang sebut nama Epstein dan senarai kenalannya terus digelar penganut teori konspirasi. Sehinggalah 3 juta muka surat dilepaskan oleh Jabatan Kehakiman Amerika sendiri. Lebih 2,000 video. 180,000 imej. Bukan dari blog. Bukan dari forum gelap. Dari kerajaan sendiri, di bawah undang-undang yang diluluskan khas untuk memaksa pendedahan. Dan akibatnya nyata. Ada yang ditangkap.…
❤1
Dia Yang Suruh Dunia Percaya, Sekarang Enggan Bercakap Anthony Fauci berdiri di hadapan Senat minggu lepas. Dan dia enggan menjawab. Dia guna Pindaan Kelima. Hak untuk berdiam diri supaya kata-katanya sendiri tak digunakan terhadapnya. Orang yang sama. Yang bertahun-tahun jadi wajah rasmi menentukan apa dunia patut percaya. Yang kata-katanya jadi neraca membezakan mana sains, mana teori konspirasi. Yang sesiapa m…
Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @Sharingbynfam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 298,870 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sharing by NFAM” (@Sharingbynfam), 7,158 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Sharingbynfam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.