Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Sir Azri Channel

Channel

Sir Azri Channel

@sirazribrotherhood

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

19,554subscribers

-37 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001409374592
TypeChannel
Username@sirazribrotherhood
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 November 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sirazribrotherhood

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

6,010 average views per post against 19,554 subscribers — an engagement rate of 30.7%. Across the 483 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,021–31,593 subscribers, posting mainly in Indonesian — the middle half sit between 1.40% and 6.25%, with a median of 3.35%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (26 August 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Posts measured15 of 15 published in the window (0 exact, 15 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled90,130
Mature posts only35.6% over 11 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers19,554 measured 25 September 2026
Cohortb10000:ind · 483 channels · p10 0.556% · p25 1.40% · p50 3.35% · p75 6.25% · p90 11.5%
Position in cohort99.793th percentile · 9.2× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.148% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageIndonesian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 25 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

19,55419,60119,577.57 August 2026 — 19,591 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,588 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,593 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,598 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,590 subscribers13 August 2026 — 19,585 subscribers14 August 2026 — 19,576 subscribers16 August 2026 — 19,575 subscribers17 August 2026 — 19,572 subscribers18 August 2026 — 19,567 subscribers19 August 2026 — 19,571 subscribers20 August 2026 — 19,565 subscribers21 August 2026 — 19,587 subscribers24 August 2026 — 19,582 subscribers25 August 2026 — 19,584 subscribers26 August 2026 — 19,583 subscribers27 August 2026 — 19,594 subscribers28 August 2026 — 19,601 subscribers29 August 2026 — 19,595 subscribers31 August 2026 — 19,594 subscribers1 September 2026 — 19,593 subscribers2 September 2026 — 19,589 subscribers3 September 2026 — 19,583 subscribers5 September 2026 — 19,582 subscribers8 September 2026 — 19,566 subscribers11 September 2026 — 19,562 subscribers13 September 2026 — 19,555 subscribers14 September 2026 — 19,562 subscribers16 September 2026 — 19,557 subscribers18 September 2026 — 19,555 subscribers25 September 2026 — 19,554 subscribers7 August 202625 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 49 days, net -37. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,547–19,608 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 07:3619,554-1
18 Sept 2026, 23:0019,555-2
16 Sept 2026, 13:0019,557-5
14 Sept 2026, 17:3919,562+7
13 Sept 2026, 07:3719,555-7
11 Sept 2026, 13:2219,562-4
8 Sept 2026, 21:3519,566-16
5 Sept 2026, 10:5719,582-1
3 Sept 2026, 10:0319,583-6
2 Sept 2026, 04:2419,589-4
1 Sept 2026, 07:3519,593-1
31 Aug 2026, 09:2319,594-1
29 Aug 2026, 08:1319,595-6
28 Aug 2026, 06:3319,601+7
27 Aug 2026, 09:5319,594+11
26 Aug 2026, 12:1719,583-1
25 Aug 2026, 13:0319,584+2
24 Aug 2026, 10:1819,582-5
21 Aug 2026, 09:5619,587+22
20 Aug 2026, 10:3519,565first reading

Engagement

77 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.7%
avg views ÷ 19,554 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,010
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 77 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held77 (1 August 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total90,130
Reactions total6,309
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 01:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2h 17m
Average length
5m 57s

Measured directly from 23 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

36,784 reactions across 77 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁17,19546.7%
👍6,74518.3%
💯4,01110.9%
🔥3,68010.0%
❤2,8177.66%
😭8242.24%
👌6381.73%
🤩3190.867%
👏2030.552%
🥰1360.37%
❤‍🔥1080.294%
😘480.13%
🎉390.106%
😍210.057%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 77 of the 77 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36,784 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 77 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 13:23 UTC≈2,330 views179 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @malaydigestPhoto

"Siri kenyataan Anwar mengenai sokongan "strong, formidable and convincing majority" pada tahun 2020 dan 2021 untuk menjatuhkan kerajaan pimpinan Tan Sri Muhyiddin tidak pernah disiasat, dituduh atau diheret di bawah Seksyen 233 Akta Komunikasi dan Multimedia 1998 sebagai berita palsu"—Wan Muhammad Azri https://www.facebook.com/share/p/19b6q2dX6L/ Baca: https://malaydigest.com/post/260902-kalau-kenyataan-palsu-anwa…

👍137🔥24❤9💯8❤‍🔥1

2 Sept 2026, 11:33 UTC≈3,490 views221 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Keluar Mahkamah terus dapat saman 🤣 https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1EyMgv9cAb/?mibextid=wwXIfr

🤩130👍33😁21🔥14❤‍🔥9❤4😭4🎉3

2 Sept 2026, 10:15 UTC≈3,720 views264 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

FAHMI FADZIL YANG GAGAL- PEMERHATI Komunikasi kerajaan Madani gagal kerana Fahmi. Itu kritikan keras seorang pemerhati yang mendakwa kelemahan komunikasi kerajaan bukan sekadar berpunca daripada pendekatan yang ketinggalan zaman, tetapi turut berkait dengan keberkesanan Menteri Komunikasi, Datuk Seri Fahmi Fadzil yang lebih suka menyekat kebebasan bersuara Rakyat berbanding meraikan suara pendapat Rakyat.

👍175💯71😁11🔥4❤3

2 Sept 2026, 05:52 UTC≈4,110 views238 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Betul atau Wayang? AMK Angkatan Muda Kunyit bab wayang ni bagi depa.

😁213🔥12💯9❤3🎉1

1 Sept 2026, 06:37 UTC≈5,790 views614 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

𝗦𝗘𝗠𝗔𝗡𝗚𝗔𝗧 𝗔𝗡𝗔𝗞 𝗠𝗨𝗗𝗔 1.Saya ke 𝑀𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑘𝑎 𝑃𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑒 Putrajaya untuk lihat sambutan oleh rakyat. 2.Saya gembira kerana sambutan masih hangat (betul-betul hangat). 3.Tak benar sangkaan kononnya anak muda tidak hargai merdeka. 4.Saya lihat ramai anak muda Melayu, Cina dan India dalam barisan pemerhati. 5.Muka mereka ria dan jelas mereka sedang sambut kemerdekaan seolah-olah mereka baru merdeka selepas dijajah. 6.Semangat …

❤536💯44👍11🥰8❤‍🔥5🤩5😭3😘2

31 Aug 2026, 13:27 UTC≈5,440 views584 reactionsread 3 September 2026

𝗡𝗘𝗚𝗔𝗥𝗔 𝗬𝗔𝗡𝗚 𝗛𝗜𝗟𝗔𝗡𝗚 𝗔𝗗𝗔𝗕 1. Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad berusia 101 tahun. Beliau pernah jadi Perdana Menteri selama 22 tahun dan 22 bulan. Suka atau tidak, itu fakta dan sejarah Malaysia. 2. Kita boleh tak bersetuju dengannya. Kita boleh mengkritiknya. Tapi kita tak boleh memilih sejarah mana yang mahu diingati hanya kerana pemerintah sekarang tidak suka atau tidak senang dengan beliau. 3. Hari ini beliau datang menya…

👍376😭114❤52💯33❤‍🔥5🥰3🎉1

31 Aug 2026, 11:11 UTC≈5,340 views696 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤621❤‍🔥25🔥16💯13🥰11👍10

31 Aug 2026, 04:52 UTC≈5,650 views826 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Apapun alasannya... adalah sgt malang apabila seorang negarawan ulung diperlakukan sebegini... bukan kali pertama malah sudah berulang kali...inikah erti kemerdekaan bagi mereka... puas hati? Tun mungkin tak duduk di tempat yg paling istimewa di atas pentas utama kt sana tapi kedudukan Tun sangat teristimewa di dalam hati kami semua.. TERIMA KASIH Tun

❤533😭229💯23🔥19❤‍🔥15🥰7

30 Aug 2026, 15:14 UTC≈6,560 views473 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Poll

Dia turunkan kuota minyak dia juga naikkan kuota minyak lepas tu dia suruh rakyat puji dia. Gila ke tak ni?

  1. GILA MENTAL99%
  2. PMEK TERBAIK1%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

😁398💯55🔥12❤5❤‍🔥2🥰1

30 Aug 2026, 09:27 UTC≈7,220 views439 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Sedarlah Guys Dah berbuih Sir cakap pasal yang Non Kunyit campurkan haram dengan halal Hari ni dia buat pengakuan Entah sedar ke tidak rakyat umat Islam dengan apa yang barua ni cakap dan buat. Menteri Agama pun bisu, Mufti pun bisu. Bertaubat lah kepada mereka yang masih sokong Barua ni.

🔥307👍52😭36💯27❤10🤩3👏1🥰1

30 Aug 2026, 03:41 UTC≈7,240 views350 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Wah dah bincang beberapa kali dengan PMEK Eh bukan SPRM badan bebas ke? Hahaha Betul salah guna kuasa lah Banduan Jenayah Liwat ni. Tak serik serik

😁266👍34🔥23💯21😭3❤2😍1

29 Aug 2026, 09:29 UTC≈7,480 views463 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Jawapan yang tepat adalah Negara kini dipimpin Banduan Liwat yang mengamalkan Homoseksual

👍344💯93🔥18❤6🥰2

Showing the 12 most recent of 77 posts we hold for @sirazribrotherhood. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Aug 2026, 15:14 UTCAnonymous Poll1,980 voters approx.

Dia turunkan kuota minyak dia juga naikkan kuota minyak lepas tu dia suruh rakyat puji dia. Gila ke tak ni?

  1. GILA MENTAL99%
  2. PMEK TERBAIK1%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 77 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Firdaus Wong Wai Hung Telegram
@brofirdauswong · 91,048
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Sir Azri Channel” (@sirazribrotherhood), 19,554 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sirazribrotherhood.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.