Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
6,010 average views per post against 19,554 subscribers — an engagement rate of 30.7%. Across the 483 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,021–31,593 subscribers, posting mainly in Indonesian — the middle half sit between 1.40% and 6.25%, with a median of 3.35%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (26 August 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Posts measured
15 of 15 published in the window (0 exact, 15 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
90,130
Mature posts only
35.6% over 11 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 25 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
31 measurements spanning 49 days, net -37. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,547–19,608 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 07:36
19,554
-1
18 Sept 2026, 23:00
19,555
-2
16 Sept 2026, 13:00
19,557
-5
14 Sept 2026, 17:39
19,562
+7
13 Sept 2026, 07:37
19,555
-7
11 Sept 2026, 13:22
19,562
-4
8 Sept 2026, 21:35
19,566
-16
5 Sept 2026, 10:57
19,582
-1
3 Sept 2026, 10:03
19,583
-6
2 Sept 2026, 04:24
19,589
-4
1 Sept 2026, 07:35
19,593
-1
31 Aug 2026, 09:23
19,594
-1
29 Aug 2026, 08:13
19,595
-6
28 Aug 2026, 06:33
19,601
+7
27 Aug 2026, 09:53
19,594
+11
26 Aug 2026, 12:17
19,583
-1
25 Aug 2026, 13:03
19,584
+2
24 Aug 2026, 10:18
19,582
-5
21 Aug 2026, 09:56
19,587
+22
20 Aug 2026, 10:35
19,565
first reading
Engagement
77 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
30.7%
avg views ÷ 19,554 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,010
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 77 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
77 (1 August 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
90,130
Reactions total
6,309
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 01:03 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2h 17m
Average length
5m 57s
Measured directly from 23 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
36,784 reactions across 77 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
17,195
46.7%
👍
6,745
18.3%
💯
4,011
10.9%
🔥
3,680
10.0%
❤
2,817
7.66%
😭
824
2.24%
👌
638
1.73%
🤩
319
0.867%
👏
203
0.552%
🥰
136
0.37%
❤🔥
108
0.294%
😘
48
0.13%
🎉
39
0.106%
😍
21
0.057%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 77 of the 77 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36,784 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 77 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
"Siri kenyataan Anwar mengenai sokongan "strong, formidable and convincing majority" pada tahun 2020 dan 2021 untuk menjatuhkan kerajaan pimpinan Tan Sri Muhyiddin tidak pernah disiasat, dituduh atau diheret di bawah Seksyen 233 Akta Komunikasi dan Multimedia 1998 sebagai berita palsu"—Wan Muhammad Azri
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/19b6q2dX6L/
Baca: https://malaydigest.com/post/260902-kalau-kenyataan-palsu-anwa…
FAHMI FADZIL YANG GAGAL- PEMERHATI Komunikasi kerajaan Madani gagal kerana Fahmi. Itu kritikan keras seorang pemerhati yang mendakwa kelemahan komunikasi kerajaan bukan sekadar berpunca daripada pendekatan yang ketinggalan zaman, tetapi turut berkait dengan keberkesanan Menteri Komunikasi, Datuk Seri Fahmi Fadzil yang lebih suka menyekat kebebasan bersuara Rakyat berbanding meraikan suara pendapat Rakyat.
𝗦𝗘𝗠𝗔𝗡𝗚𝗔𝗧 𝗔𝗡𝗔𝗞 𝗠𝗨𝗗𝗔
1.Saya ke 𝑀𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑘𝑎 𝑃𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑒 Putrajaya untuk lihat sambutan oleh rakyat.
2.Saya gembira kerana sambutan masih hangat (betul-betul hangat).
3.Tak benar sangkaan kononnya anak muda tidak hargai merdeka.
4.Saya lihat ramai anak muda Melayu, Cina dan India dalam barisan pemerhati.
5.Muka mereka ria dan jelas mereka sedang sambut kemerdekaan seolah-olah mereka baru merdeka selepas dijajah.
6.Semangat …
𝗡𝗘𝗚𝗔𝗥𝗔 𝗬𝗔𝗡𝗚 𝗛𝗜𝗟𝗔𝗡𝗚 𝗔𝗗𝗔𝗕
1. Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad berusia 101 tahun. Beliau pernah jadi Perdana Menteri selama 22 tahun dan 22 bulan. Suka atau tidak, itu fakta dan sejarah Malaysia.
2. Kita boleh tak bersetuju dengannya. Kita boleh mengkritiknya. Tapi kita tak boleh memilih sejarah mana yang mahu diingati hanya kerana pemerintah sekarang tidak suka atau tidak senang dengan beliau.
3. Hari ini beliau datang menya…
Apapun alasannya... adalah sgt malang apabila seorang negarawan ulung diperlakukan sebegini... bukan kali pertama malah sudah berulang kali...inikah erti kemerdekaan bagi mereka... puas hati?
Tun mungkin tak duduk di tempat yg paling istimewa di atas pentas utama kt sana tapi kedudukan Tun sangat teristimewa di dalam hati kami semua.. TERIMA KASIH Tun
Sedarlah Guys
Dah berbuih Sir cakap pasal yang Non Kunyit campurkan haram dengan halal
Hari ni dia buat pengakuan
Entah sedar ke tidak rakyat umat Islam dengan apa yang barua ni cakap dan buat.
Menteri Agama pun bisu, Mufti pun bisu.
Bertaubat lah kepada mereka yang masih sokong Barua ni.
Jawapan yang tepat adalah Negara kini dipimpin Banduan Liwat yang mengamalkan Homoseksual
👍344💯93🔥18❤6🥰2
Showing the 12 most recent of 77 posts we hold for @sirazribrotherhood. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Dia turunkan kuota minyak dia juga naikkan kuota minyak lepas tu dia suruh rakyat puji dia.
Gila ke tak ni?
GILA MENTAL99%
PMEK TERBAIK1%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 77 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Firdaus Wong Wai Hung Telegram @brofirdauswong · 91,048 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sir Azri Channel” (@sirazribrotherhood), 19,554 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sirazribrotherhood.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.