Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 6 days, net -600. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 164,170–164,950 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 09:02
164,260
-86
11 Aug 2026, 10:07
164,346
-86
10 Aug 2026, 07:01
164,432
-113
9 Aug 2026, 05:51
164,545
-91
8 Aug 2026, 08:42
164,636
-117
7 Aug 2026, 05:40
164,753
-107
6 Aug 2026, 09:45
164,860
first reading
Engagement
57 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.3%
avg views ÷ 164,260 subscribers
Avg views / post
18,500
57 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.38%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
57
of 57 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
57 (5 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
1,056,590
Reactions total
14,546
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈6,120
Videos
≈1,060
Links
≈1,490
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2m 44s
Average length
21s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
14,546 reactions across 57 posts, in 39 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3,241
22.3%
custom 5242405380344007782
2,639
18.1%
🤣
1,971
13.6%
🤯
1,553
10.7%
🔥
861
5.92%
custom 5256240290343164789
809
5.56%
💯
539
3.71%
👎
494
3.40%
😁
485
3.33%
custom 5397719798723420313
413
2.84%
💔
381
2.62%
❤🔥
247
1.70%
custom 5462873262897764840
180
1.24%
😍
171
1.18%
👍
146
1.00%
🤡
105
0.722%
🎉
42
0.289%
😢
35
0.241%
😭
28
0.192%
🤮
27
0.186%
19 further kinds
179
1.23%
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 57 of the 57 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14,546reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 57 we hold a reading for · 12%
Most on one post
8
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @betboom_esports. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 57 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
😍😍 ИДЁМ В ЛОГОВО ФРИБЕТОВ?? 💨
💰 УСЛОВИЯ ЗАВОЗА ПРОСТЕЙШИЕ:
1️⃣ Двигайся по мапе КАЖДЫЙ ДЕНЬ
2️⃣ Фарми голду и открывай клетки
3️⃣ Собирай ЛУТ из фрибетов и токенов BB PASS
Те, кто добежит до логова Рошана, зарубятся за 3 ЛЯМА ФРИБЕТОВ 🚶♂️ А за купоны можно забрать топовый лут – имбовейший комп и поездку на BLAST Rivals Hong Kong 👍
ФАРМИИИИМ 👏 ФАРМИИИИМ 👏
TaiLung притянул оргу за пруфы! 🆗
Я публично обращаюсь к LGD и PGL: в чём конкретно причина моего отстранения и какие доказательства существуют против меня?
⠀
Если доказательства есть − я хочу их увидеть и получить возможность ответить. Если моя вина будет доказана, я готов принять любые последствия. Если нет, справедливо будет публично признать это и принести извинения ☝️
«Драконы» раздадут 9 000 000 фрибетов и ИГРОВОЙ КОМП лучшим агентам 🤔
Какой-то суетолог снова разбросал все фрагменты Team Spirit по миру 😢 Нужно фастиком всё найти и решить квесты ❗️ Напрягаем извилины, лутаем сезонные подарки и боремся за главные призы ТУТ ☝
😍😍 Ноксвиль дропнул Tournament preview к Инту 🛡 На сайте инфа:
🎮 Об истории встреч всех тим
🎮 Факты о мете, пиках и банах
🎮 Стата про каждого игрока
Учитываем в фентези, предиктах и при спаме ставок 📰
Кста, Топсон стал седьмым, кто может стать обладателем 3️⃣ Аегисов 💪 Кто-то верит, что такая легенда появится? 👀
🔥 — да, будет 3-кратный чемпион Инта
💔 — нет, никто из них не возьмёт Аегу
Showing the 12 most recent of 57 posts we hold for @betboom_esports. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@betboom_esports edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 69,098 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ТравоБет🐳 @travobet · 192,253 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
Team Spirit @Team_Spirit_Official · 199,595 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
Nix @nixtalk · 224,139 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
Recrent @recrent · 234,554 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
Dota 2 @Dota2 · 299,980 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
BETBOOM @betboom · 151,412 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 12 August 2026
Stray Dungeon @StrayDungeon228 · 146,285 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 13 August 2026
Team Spirit CS2 @TSpiritCS · 218,575 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
Серега пират @serega_pirat2 · 161,757 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 12 August 2026
dyrachyo @dyrachyo · 211,300 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
ИГРЫ ПК @igry_na_pk_onlayn · 370,833 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
ТРУСЫ РАЙЗА @raiznews · 521,596 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 August 2026
Соляноторий @PathOfMisanthrope · 190,721 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 August 2026
РАЙЗ ЛАВ Ю @raiz · 314,656 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
donk @donk1221 · 282,766 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
M0NESY LIFE @m0NESY13 · 255,208 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
Aurora CS2 @AuroraTeam · 213,027 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
OverDrive | 20 ЛЕТ В АРКАДЕ @ihuntnoobs · 207,864 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
WINLINE @winline · 264,301 Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BETBOOM Esports Dota 2” (@betboom_esports), 164,260 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/betboom_esports.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
