Предложения сюда: [email protected]
Личного менеджера/сотрудника нет!
Премиум-чат: https://t.me/tribute/app?startapp=so4y — без слоумода.
Премиум-чат (крипта): https://t.me/send?start=SBl8NUpufBAbJkY2Fi — даст после оплаты
Все ссылки: taplink.cc/sikle
Created
14 August 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
65 measurements spanning 98 days, net +726. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,207–24,230 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Nov 2026, 08:01
24,057
+123
10 Nov 2026, 07:46
23,934
-30
8 Nov 2026, 17:59
23,964
-5
7 Nov 2026, 12:06
23,969
-3
6 Nov 2026, 12:59
23,972
-54
5 Nov 2026, 13:06
24,026
+3
4 Nov 2026, 12:00
24,023
-9
3 Nov 2026, 15:16
24,032
-4
2 Nov 2026, 16:07
24,036
-4
1 Nov 2026, 13:27
24,040
-6
31 Oct 2026, 15:46
24,046
-10
30 Oct 2026, 14:00
24,056
-6
29 Oct 2026, 14:59
24,062
-5
28 Oct 2026, 15:50
24,067
-7
27 Oct 2026, 15:51
24,074
-8
26 Oct 2026, 18:57
24,082
-7
25 Oct 2026, 15:38
24,089
-12
24 Oct 2026, 13:11
24,101
-11
23 Oct 2026, 10:06
24,112
+17
22 Oct 2026, 10:46
24,095
first reading
Engagement
108 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 129 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
76.1%
avg views ÷ 24,057 subscribers
Avg views / post
18,300
37 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.68%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
38
of 108 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held
108 (23 July 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total
677,600
Reactions total
18,157
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Nov 2026, 18:02 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
641
Videos
124
Links
691
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
4m 38s
Average length
25s
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
46,011 reactions across 106 posts, in 55 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
26,203
56.9%
😁
6,213
13.5%
custom 5408917736241792819
4,550
9.89%
🤣
1,609
3.50%
❤🔥
1,135
2.47%
🔥
985
2.14%
👍
775
1.68%
custom 5409116150845966340
761
1.65%
😢
736
1.60%
😨
384
0.835%
😭
363
0.789%
🥴
294
0.639%
🍓
262
0.569%
🤔
189
0.411%
🤯
188
0.409%
😐
142
0.309%
👀
113
0.246%
🕊
112
0.243%
☃
95
0.206%
🙉
92
0.2%
35 further kinds
810
1.76%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 106 of the 108 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 46,011 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 108 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
95
across the posts below
Posts paid on
32
of 106 we hold a reading for · 30%
Most on one post
26
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sikleqq. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 108 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 14 of 38 posts held from the last 30 days (36.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
😳 Список багов ещё очень большой, треть его уже передана. Да-да, поэтому наш любимый патч задерживается; сейчас ещё ебанутые побегут баги с Meepo 😳 искать, при помощи которых герой угоняет видеокарты, караваны и гадит в ваш хлев, и мы вообще обновления не дождёмся.
Долго чесал голову, какой баг выбрать, решил поделиться полезным (он всё равно уже отправлен). У Toss 🤩 пониженный урон по постройкам (эвоно как!) — 33%.…
😳 В атласе иконок для миникарты (minimap_sheet) поменяли рамку, которой вырезали оттуда Shield 😛руну — рамка затрагивала кусок Water 😛 руны из-за чего первая рисовалась с лишними деталями на миникарте. Эта неточность существовала с 7.33 патча (апрель, 2023). Сейчас взяли на 10 пикселей вправо от чего опять сломали отображение руны (окантовку) и даже умудрились на пару пикселей сдвинуть Wisdom руну. В итоге рамка тепе…
😳 Раз такая пляска, и вспомнился Techies 😳, то грех не сказать про абузный баг. Спамеры этого величественного и весьма балансного героя наверняка уже знают про него и злятся, что я рассказываю, обливаясь слюнями.
Обычно у Proximity Mines 🤩 есть 1.0 секунды "фитиля" — времени, когда мина издаёт звук, но не взрывается. Баг заключается в том, что если у вас есть цепочка мин, и вам достаточно, допустим, 1 мины, чтобы уб…
😳 В сентябре 2014 вышла Swine of the Sunken Galley 😳 — аркана на Techies 😳. При надетом наборе на героя вешается невидимая метка modifier_techies_arcana_damage_listener. Она работает как триггер реплики-насмешки при определённом действии (уроне от способностей) и вешается с начала игры.
Если раньше никакой проблемы с этим не возникало, то в 2025 в игру ввели Largo 😳, а он любит слизывать сливки баффов/дебаффов, повы…
😁194✍12❤11🤯7🐳4
Showing the 12 most recent of 108 posts we hold for @sikleqq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@sikleqq edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
5 November 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 17 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Старший по доте @korb3ndetka · 26,305 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 September 2026
collapse1221 @TScollapse1221 · 95,579 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 20 August 2026
Miposhka @miposhqa · 57,476 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 24 August 2026
Mira @miradoto · 51,707 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 August 2026
ULTIMATE Dota 2 @ultimatedota · 25,066 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 September 2026
Dota Today @dotatoday · 25,935 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 16 September 2026
Tundra Esports @TundraTribe · 27,967 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 September 2026
Аналитика Ошибок | Ставки, Новости, Дота 2 @dotapredict · 40,879 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 August 2026
Киберсрач @cybersrach · 26,015 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 September 2026
Dota 2 @Dota2 · 364,573 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
Глупости Анастейши @nastyamulla · 33,174 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 5 September 2026
Закулисье Артиста @art1stcs · 25,072 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 September 2026
Дота 2 Интернешнл @kibersport_dota2 · 25,315 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 13 September 2026
Royal Snake | Турниры и Новости DOTA 2 @RoyalSnakee · 26,514 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 16 September 2026
Алексей GrOOm_zemelya @Groombich · 18,709 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 October 2026
CYBERSLOVO @cyberslovo · 40,965 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 29 August 2026
ALOHADANCE ya @ALOHADANCEya · 37,851 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 31 August 2026
HULIGANI @L1GATEAM · 38,382 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 August 2026
это же sereGGa! @sereggadota · 68,855 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 23 August 2026
TORONTOTOKYO @torontotokyo · 22,502 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 September 2026
Kosagamy @kosagamy · 71,915 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 19 August 2026
DEADLOCK ONE — новости Deadlock / Valve @deadlockrf · 34,266 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 13 September 2026
FISSURE Dota 2 @fissure_pro_dota2 · 32,118 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 4 September 2026
Крипочки Тысячного Ранга | Dota 2 cybersport @kripo4kii · 50,186 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 47 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“s/kle - dota” (@sikleqq), 24,057 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sikleqq.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.