Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Puredota

@puredota187

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

20,920subscribers

-76 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001984168628
TypeChannel
Username@puredota187
Created29 March 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/puredota187

Growth

20,92020,99720,958.56 August 2026 — 20,996 subscribers7 August 2026 — 20,997 subscribers8 August 2026 — 20,991 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,986 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,984 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20,981 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,986 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,971 subscribers14 August 2026 — 20,942 subscribers15 August 2026 — 20,920 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 9 days, net -76. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,908–21,009 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 13:3320,920-22
14 Aug 2026, 03:0620,942-29
12 Aug 2026, 22:1720,971-15
12 Aug 2026, 00:1420,986+5
11 Aug 2026, 03:0120,981-3
10 Aug 2026, 05:2420,984-2
9 Aug 2026, 05:5120,986-5
8 Aug 2026, 05:3620,991-6
7 Aug 2026, 04:3620,997+1
6 Aug 2026, 10:0220,996first reading

Engagement

58 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.3%
avg views ÷ 20,920 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,790
58 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.09%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
58
of 58 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held58 (4 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total161,778
Reactions total1,771
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 07:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 19s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,771 reactions across 58 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,12863.7%
😈1176.61%
🔥1146.44%
😭965.42%
🐳693.90%
😢683.84%
🍓633.56%
🙏522.94%
💔351.98%
😎291.64%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 58 of the 58 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,771reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 58 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 58 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @puredota187. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 58 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 07:08 UTC568 views17 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @onewin_dotaPhoto

🤝🤝 Задержались перед матчем, нагоняем график.

🔥96🍓2

15 Aug 2026, 06:20 UTC≈1,010 views21 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Украдём их жизни 😇 ▶️ STREAM

🍓135🔥3

15 Aug 2026, 05:04 UTC≈1,370 views26 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

hydration break today😏 🗝 x 🗝 — 9:00 msk

16🐳4🍓3🔥1😈1😎1

14 Aug 2026, 10:10 UTC≈2,620 views90 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Подрезали крылышки🤩 🗝🤝🤝🗝

65🔥12😎8🍓4🐳1

14 Aug 2026, 09:19 UTC≈2,910 views39 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Зря вы отдали нам LAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGO🐸 🔴STREAM

32🙏4🍓1🔥1😈1

14 Aug 2026, 08:45 UTC≈3,110 views48 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Я проиграл... НО КАК?💀

😢35🐳7🙏32😈1

14 Aug 2026, 07:56 UTC≈2,980 views22 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

secret strategy.... STREAM

😈174🙏1

14 Aug 2026, 07:28 UTC≈2,910 views37 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

32🐳5

14 Aug 2026, 07:24 UTC≈2,850 views60 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

ВАНЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕЕК 🍓 🗝🤝🤝🗝

47🍓9🐳4

14 Aug 2026, 07:21 UTC≈2,650 views22 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

Скитерочек то истинный браточек 😁

18🔥3😈1

14 Aug 2026, 07:10 UTC≈2,530 views17 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

Ванек завтракает Скитерком 🤩

11🔥3🙏3

14 Aug 2026, 06:11 UTC≈2,550 views22 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Dark Seer, Dark Willow, Dark Lifestealer... 🌚 🔭 STREAM

17🐳3🙏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 58 posts we hold for @puredota187. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@puredota187 edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
15 August 2026
Most recent edit
15 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 780,467 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Ramzi666
@Ramzesasd · 117,500
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
dyrachyo
@dyrachyo · 211,955
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
BETBOOM Esports Dota 2
@betboom_esports · 172,183
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 12 August 2026
Gabe News | Dota 2
@gabenews · 147,419
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 13 August 2026
SilverName
@SilverNameTV · 105,516
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 15 August 2026
Team Spirit
@Team_Spirit_Official · 202,747
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
Dota 2
@Dota2 · 303,403
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
BETBOOM Streamers Battle
@betboomstreamersbattle · 113,173
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
WINLINE Esports
@winlinesports · 131,066
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
Nix
@nixtalk · 235,877
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
Stray Dungeon
@StrayDungeon228 · 147,765
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 13 August 2026
ТравоБет🐳
@travobet · 193,861
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
finargot
@finargoth · 137,897
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Puredota” (@puredota187), 20,920 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/puredota187.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.