🔥Обучаем графическому дизайну с нуля до денег на фрилансе с гарантией: https://design-school-unid.ru?utm_source=tlg
Попробовать профессию бесплатно и собрать проект за 7 дней: https://unid-school.ru/logo?utm_source=channelgd
#8SZXT
Created
Between 1 December 2021 and 31 May 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
40 measurements spanning 70 days, net -1,078. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40,111–41,513 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 40
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Oct 2026, 16:00
40,273
-1
15 Oct 2026, 12:59
40,274
-14
14 Oct 2026, 12:26
40,288
-24
13 Oct 2026, 01:45
40,312
-61
8 Oct 2026, 19:59
40,373
-69
4 Oct 2026, 11:35
40,442
-102
26 Sept 2026, 02:00
40,544
-101
19 Sept 2026, 07:16
40,645
-17
16 Sept 2026, 17:59
40,662
-42
14 Sept 2026, 17:59
40,704
-20
13 Sept 2026, 03:01
40,724
-25
11 Sept 2026, 01:22
40,749
-53
8 Sept 2026, 03:55
40,802
-49
5 Sept 2026, 03:17
40,851
-15
3 Sept 2026, 10:14
40,866
-20
2 Sept 2026, 02:37
40,886
-8
1 Sept 2026, 04:35
40,894
-22
31 Aug 2026, 07:13
40,916
-5
30 Aug 2026, 07:06
40,921
-26
29 Aug 2026, 03:54
40,947
first reading
Engagement
59 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 134 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.99%
avg views ÷ 40,273 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,210
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.19%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 59 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 October 2026
Posts held
59 (20 July 2026 – 16 October 2026)
Views total
21,706
Reactions total
240
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
16 Oct 2026, 16:48 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,560
Videos
≈449
Links
≈797
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
25m 23s
Average length
1m 20s
Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
983 reactions across 56 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
499
50.8%
❤
338
34.4%
👍
67
6.82%
😁
20
2.03%
👏
14
1.42%
🥰
12
1.22%
❤🔥
11
1.12%
🤩
8
0.814%
😢
7
0.712%
🤔
5
0.509%
💯
2
0.203%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 56 of the 59 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 983 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 59 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 16 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
До сих пор не верится что такое может делать один человек😍️️️️️️
Раньше такие мультфильмы могли сделать только студии/агентства с иллюстраторами, моушен-дизайнерами, сценаристами и тд
А этот мультфильм сделала наш эксперт Настя Вовк сама, для аккаунта бренда свечей, который они запускают сейчас и уже собрали заявки на продукт🤌
Анимация сейчас — один из топовых форматов для набора охватов и вовлечения аудтории в со…
Аааа какую красоту делают участники просто😍️️️️️️
Отдельная благодарность нашему куратору Маше Голубоцкой за развернутый фидбэк по каждой домашке❤️
Даже на бесплатниках мы проверяем каждого индивидуально😌
Сегодня последний день, чтобы попасть на интенсив по ИИ-креаторству 🔥
⬆️Показываем работы участников, которые уже прошли первые этапы интенсива.
А завтра эти работы превратятся в сочные ИИ-ролики, которые участники соберут своими руками. И мы обязательно покажем вам результат!
Зарегистрироваться ещё можно сегодня до 23:59 по МСК. После этого закроем доступ к интенсиву.
Успевайте присоединиться 🚀
Как думаете норм за час такой результат?
Всем привет) На связи Артемий, основатель Unid 💜 Анализировал тут доходимость интенсива по креаторству и увидел, что маловато людей сдают первое задание(
Поэтому сам решил пройтись по всем урокам и выполнить домашки, проверить сколько времени займет.
Материал правда кайфовый.😌️️️️️️ Ксюша и Настя очень подробно объясняют, как собрать мудборд и сделать съёмку. В каждом урок…
⚡️ За 3 дня вы уже сможете делать такие работы.
Практиковаться будем на реальном брифе fashion-коллекции.
1️⃣ День: разработаете идею съёмки, соберёте мудборд и создадите первый тестовый кадр.
2️⃣ День: сгенерируете AI-модель и серию из 4–6 кадров, сохранив внешность модели и одежду.
3️⃣ День: на живом эфире вместе с экспертами соберёте из кадров короткий ролик, добавите движение, монтаж, звук и обложку.
После п…
Из чего состоит профессия ИИ-креатора?
Идеи и концепции, построение сцен, динамика, монтаж, звук, исправление ошибок генерации.
А ещё работа с заказчиком: техническое задание, правки, расчёт стоимости проекта. И отдельная задача, с которой сталкиваются многие новички, это поиск клиентов ⚡️
Всё это невозможно освоить за выходные, и мы так не говорим.
Поэтому у нас есть полноценный курс по ИИ-креаторству продолжите…
🤔 Под постом про ролик за 50 000 рублей нам написали длинный и честный комментарий
Подписчица спрашивает, кто на самом деле сможет после обучения делать такие ролики и получать за них такие деньги. И почему не показан путь новичка.
🙂↕️ Сразу скажем, с чем согласны:
50 000 рублей - это стоимость проекта, а чистый заработок после расходов на генерации, инструменты, тесты и переделки получается другим. И три дня инт…
😎💸 50 000 рублей за один такой ролик
Это работа Ксюши, нашего эксперта по нейрокреаторству.
Она сделала ИИ-ролик для медицинского бренда к дропу футболок с принтами про стоматологию.
И вот немного цифр по ролику:
▫️ 121 644 просмотра
▫️ 498 новых подписчиков
▫️ 54 репоста
▫️ 1 200 сохранений
А стоимость самой работы — 50 000 ₽.
И это хороший пример того, как сегодня выглядит работа нейрокреатора.
Бренду нужен …
А если собрать логотип из того, что лежит на столе? 👀
🔥 Мы сделали 5 знакомых лого из обычной канцелярии и оставили под каждым промпт, по которому их можно повторить.
Сохраняйте, если хотите поэкспериментировать с визуальными метафорами для своих проектов.
А если вы хотите прокачать именно насмотренность, композицию и работу с идеями, приглашаем на бесплатный курс LOGO START.
На курсе вы:
✔️ изучите Figma и созд…
⚡️ Через 10 минут начинаем эфир!
Соберём ещё два блока сайта, объединим всё в один макет и поговорим о работе UX/UI-дизайнера.
Заходите на эфир по ссылке https://unid-school.getcourse.ru/efir_vd_gd_tg ⬅️
✅ Правильный ответ: нейросеть сгенерировала ОБА этих лендинга. Но подход к работе был абсолютно разным.
1️⃣ В первом случае нейросеть делала макет без чёткого дизайна, без дизайн-системы, без точных референсов, шрифтов и готовых скиллов. Просто генерация без заданной системы.
2️⃣ Во втором случае в основу работы нейросети уже заложена проработанная база: есть исходный дизайн, задан стиль, выстроена сетка и шрифты. …
👍2🔥2❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 59 posts we hold for @unid_gd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как думаете, какой из этих сайтов сгенерировала нейросеть? 🤔
Первый вариант34%
Второй вариант19%
Оба сделаны вручную1%
Оба сгенерированы AI46%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 59 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 16 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Новогодний марафон Unid | 15-18 декабря @unid_gym · 3,594#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Ustinov CREATE | Графический дизайн @UstinovCreate · 23,283 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 September 2026
Никита Юдаев о дизайне @nikita_yudaev · 55,426 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 August 2026
Секретный канал Логомашины @logomachinee · 31,094 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 5 September 2026
diskill | школа дизайна интерьера @diskill_school · 62,995 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 August 2026
TurboText AI. Нейросети @turbotext_ai · 44,841 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“unid | графический дизайн” (@unid_gd), 40,273 subscribers as measured 16 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/unid_gd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.