Channel
@arbitrationpractice3_4
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,723subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001824270781 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @arbitrationpractice3_4 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/arbitrationpractice3_4 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:23 | 1,723 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:53 | 1,721 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:33 | 1,720 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:52 | 1,720 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 21 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (25 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,897 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:40 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
4 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 3 | 75.0% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#PLP_Подряд Подряд без экспертизы — результата нет, оплаты нет (Постановление АС ВСО от 4 августа 2026 года по делу № А33-23720/21). 📝 Что произошло. ПАО «Россети» (заказчик) и ООО «Сибпроминвест» (подрядчик) заключили договор на разработку проектной документации для техперевооружения ВЛ 500 кВ. Заказчик взыскивал неустойку за просрочку работ, подрядчик предъявил встречный иск о взыскании оплаты за фактически выпо…
#PLP_Подряд #PLP_Обогащение #PLP_Неустойка Эксперт пересчитал смету «по справедливости» — но это не неосновательное обогащение (Постановление АС ВСО от 4 августа 2026 года по делу № А10-7080/24). 📝 Что произошло. АО «Бурятнефтепродукт» (заказчик) взыскивало с ИП Шагиняна (подрядчик) неосновательное обогащение в размере разницы между оплатой по договору подряда на текущий ремонт помещений (8 743 578,80 руб.) и стои…
👍1
#PLP_Обязательства Подпись в копии акта не отменяет безучётное потребление (Постановление АС ВСО от 28 июля 2026 года по делу № А19-28025/24). 📝 Что произошло. Потребитель (ООО «Меркурий-Спецавто») оспорил акт проверки прибора учёта, акт о безучтённом потреблении электроэнергии и уведомление гарантирующего поставщика об ограничении режима потребления. Сети выявили подключение кабеля помимо прибора учёта, потребите…
❤1
#PLP_Недействительность #PLP_168 Оговорку о нарушении правил эксплуатации спрятали в исключение из страхового случая — это ничтожно (Постановление АС ВСО от 30 июля 2026 года по делу № А19-22854/24). 📝 Что произошло. Предприниматель взыскивал с САО «ВСК» около 24 млн рублей страхового возмещения за сгоревший экскаватор John Deere. Страховщик отказал в выплате, сославшись на п. 4.4.3.2 Правил № 110/2, по которому у…
👍1
#PLP_Аренда #PLP_Залог #PLP_Обогащение Залогодатель сдал в аренду без согласия залогодержателя — плати новому собственнику по рынку (Постановление АС ВСО от 31 июля 2026 года по делу № А74-1692/24). 📝 Что произошло. Россельхозбанк как залогодержатель оставил за собой нежилое здание по закладной и зарегистрировал право собственности. Обнаружилось, что помещение 398,5 кв. м занимает ООО «Свент» по договору аренды от…
Судебная практика Восточно-Сибирский округ На прошедшей неделе в каналах по другим округам были опубликованы дела, рассмотренные судами: 1️⃣ Является ли единственный участник должника-банкрота обязательным третьим лицом в текущем споре о взыскании долга? (Постановление АС МО) 2️⃣ Суд отказал в оспаривании платежей номинального ИП — означает ли это, что и купленный на неё автомобиль уже не оспорить? (Постановление …
Требуется ли возврат имущества по акту для прекращения договора субаренды, возобновлённого на неопределённый срок, при одностороннем отказе?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Влечёт ли ничтожность сделки приватизации муниципального имущества, заключённой на основании поддельного отчёта об оценке?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
📅 Самое интересное за неделю — Восточно-Сибирский округ 1️⃣ Можно ли приватизировать муниципальное имущество по поддельному отчёту об оценке и что с этим делать прокурору? (Постановление АС ВСО) 2️⃣ Договор аренды возобновлён на неопределённый срок — можно ли расторгнуть его уведомлением без возврата имущества? (Постановление АС ВСО) 3️⃣ Глава 24 ГК не допускает одностороннего отказа от договора цессии: изменение/…
#PLP_Аренда #PLP_Извещения Уведомление об отказе от аренды расторгает договор и без акта возврата (Постановление АС ВСО от 28 июля 2026 года по делу № А58-6368/25). 📝 Что произошло. АО «Дорожник» (субарендатор) обратилось с иском к ООО «Стройиндустрия» (субарендодатель) о признании договора субаренды земельного участка от 01.12.2017 расторгнутым. Договор был возобновлён на неопределённый срок; 29.03.2023 субаренда…
👍1
#PLP_Продажа #PLP_167 #PLP_168 Поддельный отчёт об оценке при приватизации — это ничтожная сделка (Постановление АС ВСО от 28 июля 2026 года по делу № А33-31788/24). 📝 Что произошло. Прокурор в интересах муниципального образования обратился с иском к администрации и предпринимателю-покупателю о признании ничтожным договора купли-продажи муниципального имущественного комплекса, заключённого по итогам аукциона, и о …
#PLP_Цессия Глава 24 ГК не допускает одностороннего отказа от договора цессии: изменение/исключение условий возможно только по соглашению обеих сторон (Постановление АС ВСО от 22 июня 2026 года по делу № А10-1161/24). 📝 Что произошло. АО «Читаэнергосбыт» получило исполнительный лист о взыскании с ООО «Элекс» задолженности за электроэнергию (≈8 200 руб.) и неустойки. Взыскатель обратился с заявлением о процессуальн…
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @arbitrationpractice3_4. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Требуется ли возврат имущества по акту для прекращения договора субаренды, возобновлённого на неопределённый срок, при одностороннем отказе?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Влечёт ли ничтожность сделки приватизации муниципального имущества, заключённой на основании поддельного отчёта об оценке?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Допускается ли снижение размера субсидиарной ответственности контролирующего лица после его привлечения, если причинённый вред существенно меньше реестра?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Достаточно ли для оспаривания сделки должника по п. 2 ст. 61.2 Закона о банкротстве установить аффилированность сторон?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Достаточно ли налогоплательщику для подтверждения вычета НДС и учёта расходов по прибыли представить формальный комплект первичных документов по контрагенту?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Лишает ли заказчика по муниципальному контракту подписание актов приёмки работ права оспаривать объём и стоимость фактически выполненных работ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 75,665 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PLP | Восточно-Сибирский” (@arbitrationpractice3_4), 1,723 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arbitrationpractice3_4.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.