Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for [HH] Demokratische Montagsspaziergänge Hamburg

Channel

[HH] Demokratische Montagsspaziergänge Hamburg

@demo_hamburg_montag

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

222subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001697056077
TypeChannel
Username@demo_hamburg_montag
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/demo_hamburg_montag

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 3 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (1 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@demo_hamburg_montag/2656 · this entry28 Jul 2026, 10:44 UTC@demo_bayern_montag/309428 Jul 2026, 10:44 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@demo_bayern_montag15 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (12–3)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 16 comparable posts for this entry, running 28 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @demo_hamburg_montag — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

222225223.57 August 2026 — 225 subscribers8 August 2026 — 225 subscribers16 August 2026 — 224 subscribers29 August 2026 — 223 subscribers5 September 2026 — 222 subscribers7 August 20265 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 30 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 222–225 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 16:19222-1
29 Aug 2026, 09:29223-1
16 Aug 2026, 14:38224-1
8 Aug 2026, 01:00225no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:00225first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 06:10 UTC10 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @kodoroc

https://kodoroc.de/2026/08/06/parahybrinoia-tourist-bringt-drohne-zu-boden/

5 Aug 2026, 22:15 UTC13 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @GelaNews

"Vielleicht ist dies einer der Gründe, warum die internationale Debatte über den Gazastreifen verstummt ist. Nicht, weil die Gewalt in irgendeiner Weise nachgelassen hätte, sondern weil ihre Auswirkungen zu schrecklich sind, als dass sich die Welt ehrlich damit auseinandersetzen könnte. Sich dieser Gewalt zu stellen, würde bedeuten, sich mit dem völligen Zusammenbruch einer moralischen Ordnung auseinanderzusetzen, di…

5 Aug 2026, 20:29 UTC16 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @magmamagazin

Die Menschen sind das eigentliche Hindernis Research Unit for Political Economy In den letzten drei Jahren war Westasien von Kriegen im Gazastreifen, in Syrien, im Libanon und im Iran betroffen, die sich bis in den Jemen, nach Jordanien und in die Golfstaaten ausweiteten. Diese Kriege dauern noch an. In unserem Blog wurde versucht, die Entwicklungen in Westasien zeitnah zu analysieren und sie nicht als isolierte E…

5 Aug 2026, 08:57 UTC13 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @rotundrealPhoto

🪖 Keiner kommt davon: Regierung plant Zwangsdienst für Kriegsdienstverweigerer! 🤔 Was tun mit den Kriegsdienstverweigerern? Diese Frage beschäftigt anscheinend mitten im Sommerloch die Bundesregierung, welche nun einen verpflichtenden Ersatzdienst für diese Gruppe plant. Der geplante Zwangsdienst für junge Menschen wird dabei natürlich im Tenor eines ,,sozialen Jahres" im Sozialbereich verkauft, obwohl selbige Bunde…

4 Aug 2026, 21:22 UTC13 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @freielinke

https://www.nachdenkseiten.de/?p=154552

3 Aug 2026, 08:37 UTC18 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @CoronaTransitionPhoto

«Wir wollen Frieden» So wie am 1. August 2020 versammelten sich in Berlin Menschen aus allen Gesellschaftsschichten, um für Frieden, Freiheit, Grundrechte und echte Corona-Aufarbeitung zu demonstrieren. Weiterlesen ... Schätzen Sie unsere Arbeit? Unterstützen Sie uns mit einer Spende ❤️ Schon ein kleiner regelmäßiger Beitrag ermöglicht unsere Unabhängigkeit. via Kaffeespende ❤️ via Paypal ❤️

30 Jul 2026, 10:58 UTC24 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @freielinke

Und wieder rennen sie alle den Lableak-Agenten und ihren fadenscheinigen Konstruktionen hinterher... Nachfolgend finden Sie einen Brief, der an [email protected] und Daniel Bates bezüglich des jüngsten Artikels von Herrn Bates »Fauci glaubte nicht, dass Covid vom Markt in Wuhan stammt«gesendet wurde, gefolgt von einem Kommentar und einer PDF-Datei mit weiteren Anmerkungen, die ich zu dem Artikel selbst gemac…

29 Jul 2026, 16:16 UTC21 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @tkp_news

Ist Fauci der Dreh- und Angelpunkt des globalen Corona-Bluffs, oder ist diese Idee nur ein Teil der großen Vertuschung von diesem Bluff? Ist Fauci ein genialer Wissenschaftler, der die Welt in den Lockdown trieb, oder ist er nur ein kleiner Akteur innerhalb einer großen militärischen Operation? Beitrag hier lesen👇 https://tkp.at/2026/07/29/fauci-mastermind-oder-suendenbock-des-corona-bluffs/

28 Jul 2026, 20:45 UTC15 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @MediaGuerillaBerlinPhoto

BILD, BILD und immer wieder BILD. Es wirkt doch zumindest sehr orchestriert, wie die BILD von staatlicher Seite kontinuierlich gefüttert wird, sofern BILD sich Dinge nicht ausdenkt und hinzu dichtet...

28 Jul 2026, 20:45 UTC18 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @MediaGuerillaBerlinPhoto

Es wird immer skuriler. Bevor es gegen 18 Uhr am Sonntag zu den Schüssen in der Spandauer Kleingarten-Kolonie kam, soll Polizei dort bereits seit Stunden (seit dem "frühen Nachmittag") überall zugange gewesen sein inkl. Hubschrauber, die dort kreisten. Nachbarn berichten, dass sich auf der Parzelle, wo es zum Zugriff kam, 3 weitere Personen befanden, die dort lautstark feierten und sich betranken. Einen Pächter mit …

28 Jul 2026, 20:45 UTC19 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @MediaGuerillaBerlinPhoto

https://archive.is/https://www.zeit.de/gesellschaft/zeitgeschehen/2026-07/csd-berlin-auto-menschenmenge-islamistisches-motiv-gxe Wem gehörte denn nun der Transporter? Nach wie vor werden beide Versionen ("Mietwagen" und "Privatfahrzeug") parallel verbreitet. Nebelkerzen über Nebelkerzen... Und wie hat man ihn eigentlich in einer abgelegenen Kleingarten-Kolonie geortet, wenn er sein Handy gar nicht bei sich hatte we…

28 Jul 2026, 20:45 UTC12 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @MediaGuerillaBerlinPhoto

Der Amokfahrer fuhr übrigens nicht "in eine Menschenmenge". Er fuhr mehr als einen halben Kilometer durch die dunkle Park-Anlage und erfasste dabei Menschen, die sich zu dieser Zeit noch auf den Wegen im Tiergarten befanden. Bei der verstorbenen Frau soll es sich um eine 65-jährige Rentnerin aus Warschau handeln, die mit ihrer Familie zu Besuch in Berlin war. Hier hieß es zunächst, dass sie gar nichts mit dem CSD zu …

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @demo_hamburg_montag. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“[HH] Demokratische Montagsspaziergänge Hamburg” (@demo_hamburg_montag), 222 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/demo_hamburg_montag.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.