بچهها شما احتمالا خوابید ۴ صبح گذشته و نمیدونم چرا خوابم نمیبره ! به کودکیم فکر میکنم به روزهایی که بزرگترین اتوبان شهر حاشیهٔ فرش خونهٔ مادربزرگ بود و بهترین و گرونترین ماشین اون ماشین کنترلی ِ پشت ویترین مغازه! روزهایی که مامان جوونتر بود و میشد بیخجالت توو بغلش آروم بگیری همون روزا که شونههای بابا مثل الان درد نمیکرد و میشد قلمدوش شد بچهها دوست دارن زود بزرگ شن بچهها برا خودشون سیبیل میذارن پا توو…

Channel
فنون و فارسی /علی عطری
@ali_atri
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
20,048subscribers
+102 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001002840142 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ali_atri |
| Created | Between 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 38 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ali_atri |
Topic
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Previous handles
Recorded in 2019 as “علی_عطری_شعرانه” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Oct 2026, 19:40 | 20,048 | +74 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 07:21 | 19,974 | +205 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 14:42 | 19,769 | +69 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 22:40 | 19,700 | +28 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 14:39 | 19,672 | +18 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 17:58 | 19,654 | +24 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 05:37 | 19,630 | +24 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 10:18 | 19,606 | +29 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 18:20 | 19,577 | +16 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 08:17 | 19,561 | +10 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:13 | 19,551 | -18 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 00:17 | 19,569 | +5 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:07 | 19,564 | -33 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:26 | 19,597 | -84 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:17 | 19,681 | -26 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 19,707 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 19,710 | -10 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:25 | 19,720 | -21 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:29 | 19,741 | -24 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:24 | 19,765 | first reading |
Engagement
75 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 75 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 4m 51s
- Average length
- 1m 13s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
38,531 reactions across 56 posts, in 53 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 28,308 | 73.5% | |
| 🤣 | 5,117 | 13.3% | |
| 💔 | 1,362 | 3.53% | |
| 😭 | 1,022 | 2.65% | |
| 💋 | 521 | 1.35% | |
| ❤🔥 | 422 | 1.10% | |
| 🔥 | 316 | 0.82% | |
| 😍 | 232 | 0.602% | |
| 🍓 | 213 | 0.553% | |
| 🥰 | 142 | 0.369% | |
| 😐 | 137 | 0.356% | |
| 👍 | 99 | 0.257% | |
| 💘 | 52 | 0.135% | |
| 😁 | 46 | 0.119% | |
| 🕊 | 44 | 0.114% | |
| 😢 | 44 | 0.114% | |
| 👏 | 39 | 0.101% | |
| ⚡ | 35 | 0.091% | |
| 🙏 | 34 | 0.088% | |
| 🤔 | 32 | 0.083% | |
| 33 further kinds | 314 | 0.815% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 61 of the 75 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42,160 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 75 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
فنون و فارسی /علی عطری pinned a photo
لینک سفارش جزوهٔ فیزیکی علوم و فنون جامع سالیانه تاملند https://B2n.ir/gm8774 @ali_atri
❤92😭9⚡1💔1😢1
دکترهای آینده 😉✌🏼 بیچاره منشیا… 🤦🏻♂️ @ali_atri
🤣636❤71😍7😐6👏4🏆3👌2🤔2
زنگ تفریحهای من چطور میگذره … 😉🫶🏻🤍 @ali_atri
❤380🤣109😍15👌8❤🔥5🍾3💋2💔2
☝🏻☝🏻☝🏻☝🏻☝🏻☝🏻☝🏻☝🏻 تمرین سماعی جدول اوزان ناهمسان @ali_atri
❤114😭25🔥2😍2🆒2⚡1🍓1💘1
Voice message, posted without a caption
❤96😭25🏆3🔥3⚡1🌚1🍓1👍1
☝🏻☝🏻☝🏻☝🏻☝🏻☝🏻☝🏻☝🏻 تمرین سماعی جدول اوزان همسان دولختی @ali_atri
❤106😭16🏆4🔥2⚡1🌚1🆒1
Voice message, posted without a caption
❤110😭17🍓3🔥3💯2⚡1🎄1👻1
☝🏻☝🏻☝🏻☝🏻☝🏻☝🏻☝🏻☝🏻 تمرین سماعی جدول اوزان همسان تکلختی @ali_atri
❤135😭10💔4⚡1💅1🔥1🆒1
Voice message, posted without a caption
❤139😭13💘8🔥3🥰2🆒2🍓1🏆1
سلام بچهها خواستم ویس بگیرم، چند بار تلاش کردم نتونستم… اگه حس منو میخواید بدونید اینه بُهت، سکوت ، بغض، غرور، عشق، ذوق…. چقدر خوشگل و پر امیده صورتای زیبای همهتون رویماه تکتکتون رو میبوسم شرمندم کردید … ❤️🥲 ادمینهای عزیزم ، خیلی به شما زحمت میدم،مرسی بابت کمکهاتون به من و بچهها 🩵 دوستدار شما، و دوستدار این قبیله بزرگ علی…
❤936💋25❤🔥8😭7🍓5🤔3⚡2🎄2
Showing the 12 most recent of 75 posts we hold for @ali_atri. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
فنون کنکور ۱۴۰۵؟؟؟؟؟
- خوب بود17%
- متوسط بود39%
- سخت بود49%
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
بچهها یه سبک انتخاب کنید امشب موزیک بذاریم 🎷تحلیلشم کنیم
- ایرانی شاد نوستالژی43%
- خارجی باکلاس21%
- رپ ایرانی ( نسل اول)29%
- سنتی ایرانی29%
The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
خب خب خب تعریف کنید ببینم خوشحال از امتحان فنون پاشدید یا نه…؟ الان در چه وضعی هستین؟ 😎
- من یه دیوونهم ، وقتشه عاقل شم ، تو تهِ خوبی ، حق بده عاشق شم 💃🏻44%
- مَحضِ رِضا خسرو پِنا ، خودِمو توو گِل میپِلِکونم 🪘🥁30%
- من دارم یه دستهگل به آب میدم، آرزوهامو به یک حباب میدم 🥀18%
- من دلم تنگه ، واسه یه دلخوشی کوچیک ، واسه یه همسفر ساده که باهاش بزنم تقطیع کنم این جاده رو با موزیک23%
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 75 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@havenhkh · 12,590#1
@mohsenbahador · 2,058#2
@admyatariii · 11,079#3
@aralartwork · 23,501#4
@mah_konkurr · 410 (as read 30 September 2026)#5
@mrezaamiriazi · 1,121#6
@kokyu · 193#7
@ensania_ir · 8,869#8
@kunkorista · 2,704#9
@tamland · 88,969 (as read 30 September 2026)#10
@alirezamokhtari1400 · 4,339#11
@aadabeadab · 10,519#12
@Angizeh_Club · 2#13
@academi_farhangiyan · 136#14
@ghaziadabiyat · 4,382#15
@entekhabi_dorost · 63#16
@mindoraei · 1,976#17
@zizimit · 76#18
@berkeye_kohan · 2,914#19
@adabiyateghezel · 208#20
@m0shaverrajaee · 1,277#21
@tarikhkonkur · 833#22
@zahraghezelbash928 · 1,011 (as read 30 September 2026)#23
@academy_houshyar · 128#24
@ensani_daneshyar · 555#25
@aysoosdiaries · 9,775#26
@Bigmehraban · 637#27
@yektapershian · 328#28
@nayebiiiiii · 1,556#29
@konkur_yaar · 5,140#30
@kinrjiifrd · 2,171#31
@Rain_in_Desert · 322#32
@miitonimma · 1,775#33
@Khoosheh_Cheen · 1,052#34
@FILMDRSY · 17,841#35
@tazaahome_khial · 2,117#36
@physicsjeiroodi · 4,378#37
@mojdehtaleb · 12,605#38
@ncdunoo · 149 (as read 30 September 2026)#39
@meisamfallahkonkour · 41,237#40
@math_orumieh · 144#41
@aitimeweekly · 256#42
@lyranity · 834#43
@Uvpn_org · 44,363#44
@theblackpersimmon · 3,784#45
@dobunnyyoung · 108#46
@neurolation · 1,268#47
@s_enatorr · 2,613#48
@ParisMen · 2,008#49
@sepininja · 45,448#50
@itismorai · 241#51
@peymanbigdelisociology · 2,801#52
@startreatments · 11,844#53
@vahshi_bafghi · 1,043#54
@enteaash · 346#55
@heenchannel · 1,994#56
@zaban_goreyshi · 42,122#57
@falsafehmanteghh_mf · 720 (as read 30 September 2026)#58
@Bkouhi_ir · 1,054#59
@i_am_riraamiri · 283#60
@IMemeThereforeIAm · 2,537#61
@princess_shop11 · 190#62
@hosseinjan_qazvin · 1,074#63
@riaziensanilotfi · 600#64
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Uvpn_org · 44,363
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 27 August 2026
@aralartwork · 23,501
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 4 October 2026
@meisamfallahkonkour · 41,237
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 28 August 2026
@MazzOnline · 49,667
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فنون و فارسی /علی عطری” (@ali_atri), 20,048 subscribers as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ali_atri.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.