Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Sepanta

Channel

Sepanta

@sepininja

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

45,839subscribers

-1,041 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001371952323
TypeChannel
Username@sepininja
Descriptionهمه چی اینجا دلیه خیلی سخت نگیرید❤️ سپی هستم،نینجا👋🥷
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sepininja

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 35% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

45,83946,88046,359.57 August 2026 — 46,880 subscribers7 August 2026 — 46,880 subscribers8 August 2026 — 46,876 subscribers9 August 2026 — 46,835 subscribers10 August 2026 — 46,815 subscribers11 August 2026 — 46,766 subscribers12 August 2026 — 46,734 subscribers13 August 2026 — 46,715 subscribers14 August 2026 — 46,657 subscribers16 August 2026 — 46,585 subscribers17 August 2026 — 46,536 subscribers18 August 2026 — 46,465 subscribers19 August 2026 — 46,431 subscribers20 August 2026 — 46,371 subscribers21 August 2026 — 46,258 subscribers23 August 2026 — 46,223 subscribers24 August 2026 — 46,394 subscribers25 August 2026 — 46,384 subscribers26 August 2026 — 46,351 subscribers27 August 2026 — 46,357 subscribers28 August 2026 — 46,360 subscribers29 August 2026 — 46,486 subscribers30 August 2026 — 46,458 subscribers31 August 2026 — 46,443 subscribers1 September 2026 — 46,420 subscribers2 September 2026 — 46,411 subscribers4 September 2026 — 46,372 subscribers6 September 2026 — 46,197 subscribers9 September 2026 — 46,241 subscribers12 September 2026 — 46,110 subscribers14 September 2026 — 45,952 subscribers15 September 2026 — 45,920 subscribers17 September 2026 — 46,020 subscribers28 September 2026 — 45,839 subscribers7 August 202628 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 52 days, net -1,041. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 45,683–47,036 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Sept 2026, 14:0145,839-181
17 Sept 2026, 19:2246,020+100
15 Sept 2026, 19:3945,920-32
14 Sept 2026, 01:3845,952-158
12 Sept 2026, 05:2146,110-131
9 Sept 2026, 22:2146,241+44
6 Sept 2026, 12:3746,197-175
4 Sept 2026, 05:2246,372-39
2 Sept 2026, 16:4846,411-9
1 Sept 2026, 15:1346,420-23
31 Aug 2026, 18:0546,443-15
30 Aug 2026, 18:0446,458-28
29 Aug 2026, 16:4946,486+126
28 Aug 2026, 13:3446,360+3
27 Aug 2026, 15:3746,357+6
26 Aug 2026, 18:5446,351-33
25 Aug 2026, 16:2346,384-10
24 Aug 2026, 17:4346,394+171
23 Aug 2026, 03:5546,223-35
21 Aug 2026, 16:2346,258first reading

Engagement

1,039 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 119 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.5%
avg views ÷ 45,839 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,710
705 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.69%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
708
of 1,039 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026
Posts held1,039 (6 August 2026 – 29 September 2026)
Views total4,023,978
Reactions total188,625
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Sept 2026, 14:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,640
Videos
≈278
Links
≈314

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
26s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

285,684 reactions across 994 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣148,43152.0%
❤31,14210.9%
😭25,9319.08%
👍20,8077.28%
💋20,2957.10%
🤝10,0293.51%
💔9,0603.17%
❤‍🔥4,5721.60%
🌚3,8891.36%
🔥3,5971.26%
🍓3,1461.10%
🍌2,6280.92%
😢1,4460.506%
😍5190.182%
🕊1920.067%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 994 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 285,684 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 8 August 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
26
across the posts below
Posts paid on
23
of 994 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sepininja. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 8 August 2026 to 29 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Sept 2026, 13:51 UTC≈2,020 views195 reactionsread 29 September 2026

من کردارم نیکه، رفتارمم نیکه، فقط این گفتار کصکشم رو درست کنم دیگه کامل میشه پکیجم.

🤣168🤝21❤6

29 Sept 2026, 12:57 UTC≈3,650 views221 reactions1 Starread 29 September 2026

خیلی ذهنم شلوغه، آقای خمسه شما یه کاری کن.

😭168🤣48🤝3💔2

29 Sept 2026, 11:38 UTC≈4,820 views366 reactionsread 29 September 2026

ماشالله امید مثل قرص ماه میمونه 🧿

👍275🤣57💋12❤8🌚7❤‍🔥4🍌3

29 Sept 2026, 11:31 UTC≈5,090 views321 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣270❤‍🔥37❤7🌚7

29 Sept 2026, 10:13 UTC≈5,850 views189 reactionsread 29 September 2026

داوایی داوایییی

🍓135🤣52❤1💋1

29 Sept 2026, 10:13 UTC≈5,880 views344 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🤣324🔥11💋5👍3😍1

29 Sept 2026, 09:19 UTC≈6,030 views305 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🤣287💋8❤6💔2🔥2

29 Sept 2026, 08:59 UTC≈6,100 views129 reactionsread 29 September 2026

مش سپی؟ @BedardamKhord

🤣122❤6🤝1

29 Sept 2026, 08:59 UTC≈6,010 views95 reactionsread 29 September 2026

مش سپی چنل بدردم خورد دینا رو میدی

🤣95

29 Sept 2026, 05:06 UTC≈7,060 views139 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

🤣136❤3

29 Sept 2026, 05:06 UTC≈6,890 views569 reactionsread 29 September 2026

با معلم زبانی که تو ۱۴ سالگی عاشقش بودم ازدواج کرده بود

🤣564❤3😢2

29 Sept 2026, 05:05 UTC≈6,820 views292 reactionsread 29 September 2026

وای تا صب خواب امید و دیدم

🤣290🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 1,039 posts we hold for @sepininja. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Aug 2026, 14:57 UTCAnonymous Poll4,340 voters approx.

تو میزونی

  1. میزووون دا18%
  2. نامیزوووووووووون82%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTCAnonymous Poll2,610 voters approx.

چه رنگی بیشتر جالبه؟

  1. سورمه ای45%
  2. سبز55%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

21 Aug 2026, 22:42 UTCAnonymous Poll4,790 voters approx.

کلم از ۱ تا ۵ چقدر تخمی شده؟

  1. ۱4%
  2. ۲2%
  3. ۳3%
  4. ۴2%
  5. ۵30%
  6. داداش اصلا هم بد نیست، بسیار زیبایی عاشقتیم🌼🌺❤️🌺🌼🌼🌺❤️59%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 8 August 2026 to 29 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

𝗦𝗘𝗣 𝗣𝗟𝗔𝗬𝗟𝗜𝗦𝗧
@seplaylist · 190 (as read 22 September 2026)
#1
نرگسی
@nargeessii · 4,646
#2
سِپکا
@sepkaism · 929 (as read 22 September 2026)
#3
RegaPlus
@RegaPlus · 1,482,987
#4
TEEN م
@ahumanfromearth · 1,863 (as read 22 September 2026)
#5
RegaLeakShit🎄
@RegaLeakShit · 42,120
#6
Vinyv
@vinyvidzam · 61,959
#7
چنل پدرت
@pedaretdiana · 49,378
#8
16.6%
@Cannceli · 315 (as read 22 September 2026)
#9
RB ʚɞ ˎˊ˗
@ExtraVirginOliveOil · 778
#10
C ya
@yacitchannel · 16,799
#11
عرف لایتیر
@ErfLightyear · 479 (as read 22 September 2026)
#12
KEEM1A
@keemssshere · 14,851
#13
BEE"
@llbeelll · 27,363
#14
وقتی دلقک گریست
@VaghtiDalghakGerist · 364 (as read 22 September 2026)
#15
Asaalmmrr
@asaalmmrr · 8,972
#16
خاکستری
@khakestariszone · 286 (as read 22 September 2026)
#17
.MoRpHiNe.
@morphine0473 · 190 (as read 22 September 2026)
#18
18 .19
@ccafunne · 126 (as read 22 September 2026)
#19
ناجیِ‌مَجنون؛
@partofmef · 223
#20
about YOK;
@aboutYokabed · 573 (as read 22 September 2026)
#21
TXT tiktok
@txtiktok · 558
#22
Kiarad
@kiachanell · 406 (as read 22 September 2026)
#23
سنت پترزبورگ نشین ساکن شمال
@pitersburgneshin · 3,441
#24
«سه‌شنبه‌ها با دایانودو🦕»
@anjomanposhti · 29,474
#25
Mohammad 🎹🎧🎤
@grbnpr · 1,466 (as read 22 September 2026)
#26
﮼ساحل
@dreamersahel · 333
#27
Betty’s note🩸
@bettynoteee · 1,992
#28
🐣
@titijooji · 3,207 (as read 22 September 2026)
#29
The Tribe of HCl
@HashCiElz · 192 (as read 22 September 2026)
#30
Thanatos Maximus
@Thanatos_Maximus · 259
#31
ARIzona🐐
@ariizonaa · 623 (as read 22 September 2026)
#32
پیام‌های‌ارسال‌نشده!
@Unsent_messagee · 22,718
#33
||سـتارهــ||
@staaaree_h · 820 (as read 22 September 2026)
#34
Stuck with me
@stuckwithmeandmysongs · 1,937
#35
ܩࡈࡋܣܝ‌ܣ
@deardiaryyyyyyyyyy · 142 (as read 22 September 2026)
#36
شماهرچي‌دوس‌داري‌صداکن.
@Rocket_Raccoonnn · 314
#37
Paranoia
@extasytext · 173
#38
𝗥𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲𝗱𝗶𝘁
@radiancedit · 198
#39
matin_ahmadi
@hermes_m2 · 570 (as read 22 September 2026)
#40
نین آکادمی | مشاوره کنکور
@ninacademy · 9,963
#41
Sara.NZ
@saaranz · 3,566
#42
Jade shomal sepi
@jadeshomalsepi · 122 (as read 22 September 2026)
#43
𝐑𝐚𝐝𝐦𝐞𝐡𝐫
@radmehrchannel · 5,579
#44
کسرا
@Real_kasraaa · 4,774 (as read 22 September 2026)
#45
فروغِ خاموش
@sillverwe · 80 (as read 22 September 2026)
#46
61
@lalayori · 506 (as read 22 September 2026)
#47
E
@iamelleeeenn · 945 (as read 22 September 2026)
#48
푸틴
@Putain_00X00 · 93 (as read 22 September 2026)
#49
دیاکو
@diyakooooow · 1,085 (as read 22 September 2026)
#50
Phonophobia.
@munusic · 290 (as read 22 September 2026)
#51
دبیرستان متوسطه دوم ، صادقیه
@sadeghiehilam · 204
#52
ARNI
@Mamtrust · 24 (as read 22 September 2026)
#53
Khalil’s House
@KhalilVault · 304 (as read 22 September 2026)
#54
Coded in 2008
@cherryontoop · 206 (as read 22 September 2026)
#55
همسر رئیس ناسا
@hamsarenasa · 1,240
#56
هواداران آیفون ایکس
@ClaraIsNotHere · 1,992
#57
مشاورهٔ تحصیلی استاد رضایی
@RezaeiConsul · 890
#58
ʙʟᴀᴄᴋᴍᴏᴏɴᴇᴅɪᴛ
@blackmoonedit · 226 (as read 22 September 2026)
#59

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

آکادمی داودی | آزمون‌های استخدامی
@academy_davoodi · 22,110
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 22 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Sepanta” (@sepininja), 45,839 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sepininja.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.