Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for AI для бизнеса

Channel

AI для бизнеса

@ai_nom

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

12,582subscribers

+5,012 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003895393657
TypeChannel
Username@ai_nom
DescriptionВсё об AI-решениях для бизнеса: внедрение, автоматизация, корпоративный ИИ, агенты ИД НОМ idnom.ru Реклама @id_nom Редакция @tech_nom
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held52
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/ai_nom

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (1 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@ai_nom/766 · this entry10 Nov 2026, 12:48 UTC@mash_tech/717510 Nov 2026, 16:30 UTC1.003.7 hours
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@mash_tech6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002.0 hourseven

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 146 comparable posts for this entry, running 31 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

7,57012,58210,0766 August 2026 — 7,570 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,570 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,611 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,990 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,306 subscribers17 August 2026 — 8,641 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,880 subscribers23 August 2026 — 9,504 subscribers26 August 2026 — 9,762 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,055 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,166 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,271 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,364 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,450 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,549 subscribers5 September 2026 — 10,619 subscribers8 September 2026 — 10,751 subscribers11 September 2026 — 10,877 subscribers13 September 2026 — 10,959 subscribers14 September 2026 — 11,004 subscribers16 September 2026 — 10,995 subscribers18 September 2026 — 11,027 subscribers25 September 2026 — 11,213 subscribers4 October 2026 — 11,523 subscribers8 October 2026 — 11,654 subscribers12 October 2026 — 11,700 subscribers14 October 2026 — 11,714 subscribers15 October 2026 — 11,731 subscribers16 October 2026 — 11,735 subscribers17 October 2026 — 11,756 subscribers18 October 2026 — 11,760 subscribers19 October 2026 — 11,844 subscribers20 October 2026 — 11,907 subscribers22 October 2026 — 11,931 subscribers23 October 2026 — 11,971 subscribers24 October 2026 — 11,994 subscribers25 October 2026 — 12,009 subscribers25 October 2026 — 12,025 subscribers27 October 2026 — 12,039 subscribers28 October 2026 — 12,046 subscribers29 October 2026 — 12,047 subscribers30 October 2026 — 12,058 subscribers31 October 2026 — 12,080 subscribers1 November 2026 — 12,104 subscribers2 November 2026 — 12,146 subscribers3 November 2026 — 12,223 subscribers4 November 2026 — 12,274 subscribers5 November 2026 — 12,325 subscribers6 November 2026 — 12,394 subscribers7 November 2026 — 12,547 subscribers8 November 2026 — 12,565 subscribers10 November 2026 — 12,582 subscribers6 August 202610 November 2026
52 measurements spanning 96 days, net +5,012. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,818–13,334 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 52
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 01:5812,582+17
8 Nov 2026, 15:5112,565+18
7 Nov 2026, 11:3912,547+153
6 Nov 2026, 08:1612,394+69
5 Nov 2026, 08:4012,325+51
4 Nov 2026, 08:1812,274+51
3 Nov 2026, 06:3712,223+77
2 Nov 2026, 07:1812,146+42
1 Nov 2026, 05:5812,104+24
31 Oct 2026, 09:0512,080+22
30 Oct 2026, 06:2912,058+11
29 Oct 2026, 04:4012,047+1
28 Oct 2026, 02:3712,046+7
27 Oct 2026, 02:4912,039+14
25 Oct 2026, 23:5512,025+16
25 Oct 2026, 01:4112,009+15
24 Oct 2026, 04:4011,994+23
23 Oct 2026, 01:4111,971+40
22 Oct 2026, 01:2711,931+24
20 Oct 2026, 17:5711,907first reading

Engagement

148 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 44 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
37.7%
avg views ÷ 12,582 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,750
50 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
50
of 148 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held148 (31 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total237,298
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 08:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
371
Videos
47
Links
709

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
7m 35s
Average length
1m 05s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Advertising

Ad load
3.38%
5 of 148 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
3
posts carrying an erid · 3 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
3,480
over 5 measured posts
Median views · rest
3,440
over 143 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFGnXHkd113 August 202613 August 2026
2W5zFJj52zM14 November 20264 November 2026
2W5zFJz3pDp129 October 202629 October 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 148 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 8 of 50 posts held from the last 30 days (16.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 08:24 UTC148 viewsread 11 November 2026

Claude и Codex начали блокировать реверс-инжиниринг ▶️ Пользователи Anthropic Claude Code и OpenAI Codex всё чаще сталкиваются с ограничениями при реверс-инжиниринге и декомпиляции ПО. В отдельных случаях дело доходит до блокировки аккаунтов - даже когда речь идёт о модификации устройств, принадлежащих самим пользователям. Пользователь может месяцами работать с моделью, а затем столкнуться с внезапным отказом или б…

11 Nov 2026, 05:16 UTC≈1,550 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Почему пилоты не дают отдачи и что отличает компании-лидеры ▶️ Многие компании уже запустили ИИ в клиентском сервисе и поддержке. Но запустить пилот и получить бизнес-эффект - не одно и то же. По данным опроса Gartner, проведённого среди руководителей служб клиентского сервиса и поддержки, значительная часть из них испытывает трудности с получением отдачи от вложений в ИИ. Проблема: внедрение начинается с инструмен…

10 Nov 2026, 14:53 UTC≈3,030 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

▶️«Т-Технологии» расширили возможности корпоративного мессенджера Time. Теперь пользователям доступен встроенный ИИ-помощник, а к платформе можно подключать собственных ИИ-агентов на базе сторонних моделей. Помощник работает в отдельном чате и умеет искать сообщения, находить оставшиеся без ответа вопросы, восстанавливать контекст обсуждений и анализировать рабочие задачи. Он также может отвечать от имени пользовате…

10 Nov 2026, 12:48 UTC≈9,910 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Российский рынок больших данных и ИИ: 528 млрд рублей и ставка на промышленное внедрение ▶️ В 2025 году российский рынок больших данных и искусственного интеллекта вырос на 20% - до 528 млрд рублей. Это примерно вдвое быстрее ИТ-рынка в целом, который прибавил около 10%. Такие данные приводит ГК Б1 совместно с Ассоциацией больших данных и TAdviser. Исследование охватывает три сегмента: услуги, программное обеспечен…

10 Nov 2026, 09:05 UTC≈3,160 viewsread 11 November 2026

Не покупать серверы, а арендовать: CorpSoft24 запустила GPU-облако для разработчиков ИИ ▶️ CorpSoft24 запустила облачные сервисы для компаний, которые разрабатывают собственные ИИ-решения или внедряют готовые модели в корпоративные системы. Это позволит бизнесу использовать вычислительные мощности с GPU и подключать языковые модели, не создавая всю ИТ-инфраструктуру самостоятельно. В новом направлении два основных …

10 Nov 2026, 07:57 UTC≈3,130 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Anthropic выпустила Claude Fable 5.2 и Claude Mythos 5.2 ▶️ Anthropic представила две новые версии своих самых мощных ИИ-моделей - Claude Fable 5.2 и Claude Mythos 5.2. По данным разработчика, обе получили улучшенные способности в программировании, логическом рассуждении и обработке изображений, а также выполняют задачи до 30% быстрее предыдущих версий. Fable 5.2 и Mythos 5.2 построены на одной базовой модели, но р…

9 Nov 2026, 15:38 UTC≈3,360 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Не попали в наши публикации, но мы заметили #ВечернийБриф Регулирование 🔴Председатель комитета Госдумы по конституционному и гражданскому законодательству Павел Крашенинников заявил, что в Госдуме есть план урегулировать вопрос авторских прав при использовании ИИ до 1 марта 2027 года. 🔴Первый зампред комитета Госдумы по цифровому развитию и ИИ Антон Немкин сообщил, что с 1 марта 2027 года российские ИИ-модели смогу…

9 Nov 2026, 14:25 UTC≈3,370 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

▶️ По данным опроса YouGov, ИИ становится массовым помощником в поиске выгодных предложений - доля тех, кто ищет скидки с его помощью, за год выросла с 16% до 34%. Но оплату и оформление заказа покупатели по-прежнему не готовы отдавать алгоритмам. ИИ готовы доверить: 🔴 найти лучшую цену - 43%; 🔴 отследить цены - 37%; 🔴 сравнить товары - 34%; 🔴 положить товар в корзину - 9%; 🔴 оформить покупку - 4–5%. Среди тех, кт…

9 Nov 2026, 12:44 UTC≈3,340 viewsread 11 November 2026

Контакт-центр с ИИ вместо оператора: MWS AI открыла внешние продажи платформы ▶️ Компания MWS AI (МТС) начала продавать внешним заказчикам комплексную мультиагентную систему для автоматизации контакт-центров. Это платформа, объединяющая голосовых и текстовых ИИ-агентов, речевую аналитику и интеграцию с корпоративными системами. В состав платформы входят несколько компонентов: 🔴 сценарные голосовые и текстовые боты…

9 Nov 2026, 10:39 UTC≈11,200 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Минцифры получает функции по развитию больших фундаментальных моделей ИИ ▶️ Правительство внесло изменения в Положение о Минцифре, закрепив за министерством три новых направления работы, касающихся больших фундаментальных моделей ИИ. Проще говоря, власти определились, кто в правительстве отвечает за большие модели и за будущее регулирование. У Минцифры будет три новых направления работы: 🔴 Анализ развития больших …

9 Nov 2026, 07:53 UTC≈3,370 viewsread 11 November 2026

Сильные ускоряются, остальные догоняют. ИИ растит разрыв в бизнесе ▶️ В 2025 году ИИ использовали лишь около 20% всех компаний, но среди крупных предприятий - более половины. И без дополнительной поддержки к 2030 году разрыв только увеличится, по крайней мере об этом говорится в обзоре ОЭСР «Перспективы цифровой экономики и общества». Разрыв ожидаем - у крупного бизнеса больше ресурсов, технических возможностей и к…

8 Nov 2026, 07:34 UTC≈7,700 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

ИИ ищет бренды, которые уже знает ▶️Маркетологи вкладываются в видимость брендов в нейросетях, но значительная часть этих усилий может идти не туда. К такому выводу пришли исследователи GeoSurge. Когда ИИ отвечает на вопрос о покупке, он не просто обращается к поисковику. Сначала модель формирует представление о том, какие бренды заслуживают внимания, опираясь на собственную память. И уже затем решает, кого искать …

Showing the 12 most recent of 148 posts we hold for @ai_nom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@ai_nom edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
6 November 2026
Most recent edit
6 November 2026

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“AI для бизнеса” (@ai_nom), 12,582 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ai_nom.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.