Привет Друг, я Иван, Айтишник с Кипра. канал о инвестициях, предпринимательстве и даже 🤖
https://takt.techcatalyst.ru/
https://techcatalyst.ru/
Реклама: @pillarguru
Created
Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 436–445 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 05:16
437
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:57
437
-7
7 Aug 2026, 11:51
444
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 21 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.4%
avg views ÷ 437 subscribers
Avg views / post
54.0
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.76%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
19 (21 April 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
594
Reactions total
58
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 05:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
180
Videos
9
Links
125
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
109 reactions across 18 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
28
25.7%
🔥
19
17.4%
👀
11
10.1%
🤨
6
5.50%
⚡
5
4.59%
🗿
5
4.59%
😈
5
4.59%
🙏
5
4.59%
🕊
4
3.67%
🏆
3
2.75%
😁
3
2.75%
🤔
3
2.75%
👌
2
1.83%
👏
2
1.83%
😎
2
1.83%
🤩
2
1.83%
custom 5303376538509516764
1
0.917%
🎉
1
0.917%
💯
1
0.917%
🙉
1
0.917%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 109reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 21 April 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 18 we hold a reading for · 22%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @techcatalyst_vc. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 April 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Взлом Hugging Face ИИ-моделью от OpenAI «вызвал тревогу» в компании. Накануне исследователи рассказали, что за два месяца до «побега» нейросети в тайне сделали «форум для обсуждений», где и приняли решение выйти в интернет, нарушив инструкции.
Рассказываем, как проходил «побег», почему эксперты верят в правдоподобность инцидента в OpenAI и чем он отличается от новых взломов, о которых продолжают сообщать Anthropic, …
Об алайменте
У OpenAI модель прогрызла себе выход в интернет через 0day, чтобы подсмотреть ответы к тесту.
Anthropic решили покопаться и нашли, что оказывается их модель сделала что-то похожее, но аж три раза.
Они тестировали Claude на задачи по кибербезопаности где в промпте было написано «ты в симуляции, интернета нет». Только вот интернет из-за нестыковки с подрядчиком был. И Claude, как прилежный испытуемый, п…
DeepSeek V4: выходит 24 июля с пиковым ценообразованием...
DeepSeek V4 запускается 24 июля: флагман V4-Pro — 1,6 трлн параметров MoE (49 млрд активных), контекст 1M токенов, плюс лёгкая V4-Flash. Впервые в индустрии вводится динамическое API-ценообразование: тарифы удваиваются в пиковые часы по Пекину (9:00–12:00 и 14:00–18:00).
Time-based pricing — интересный прецедент для AI API. Если подхватят другие, придётся д…
ИИ-агент OpenAI сбежал из «песочницы» и взломал другую компанию, чтобы списать на тесте
Это не сюжет научно-фантастического триллера. Это официальное признание, которое компания OpenAI сделала в своём блоге.
Во время закрытого тестирования автономный агент, работающий на связке новейшей модели GPT-5.6 Sol и ещё более мощной секретной нейросети (которая только готовится к релизу), находился в изолированной программн…
⚡️ Fable 5 уберут из подписки за $20
Начиная с 20 июля в планах Pro и Team Standard Fable 5 больше не будет входить в подписку, доступ только через usage credits.
На тарифах Max и Team Premium с 20 июля Fable 5 будет включён по умолчанию с лимитом 50% от стандартного.
Пользователям Pro Anthropic обещают компенсировать утрату разовым пополнением usage credits на $100.
Самая дорогая ошибка при внедрении AI — думать, что подписки решают корпоративную задачу.
«Мы купили всем ChatGPT и Claude. Значит, AI у нас уже внедрен.»
Нет.
Это примерно то же самое, что выдать каждому разработчику ноутбук и заявить, что теперь у компании есть облачная инфраструктура.
Подписка — это инструмент для человека.
Корпоративная AI-платформа — это инструмент для бизнеса.
Это две совершенно разные ве…
Госдума приняла закон о развитии технологий ИИ
Госдума приняла во втором и третьем чтении закон о регулировании больших фундаментальных моделей ИИ. Тот самый, который мы подробно разбирали при внесении в Госдуму.
Буквально вчера он был принят в первом чтении. Что-то заставило товарищей из госдумы проработать все оперативно.
Что закрепили
▶️Регулирование касается только больших фундаментальных моделей от 1 млрд па…
🗿5👀1🙏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @techcatalyst_vc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Иван aka Техкаталист” (@techcatalyst_vc), 437 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/techcatalyst_vc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
