Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for جامعه‌شناسی زن روز

Channel

جامعه‌شناسی زن روز

@Zane_Ruz_Channel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,433subscribers

+127 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001448718977
TypeChannel
Username@Zane_Ruz_Channel
Descriptionکاوش‌های جامعه‌شناسی، روان‌شناسی، دین‌پژوهی و تاریخ‌پژوهی زنان ⬅️ تماس : 📩 @Zaneruz_admin 🏷️کانال توییتر زن روز: t.me/Zane_Ruz_Twitter 🏷️کانال فیلم زن روز: t.me/+pJ5JKb7UcYEyYmQ0
Created19 October 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Zane_Ruz_Channel

Growth

9,3069,4339,369.56 August 2026 — 9,306 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,306 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,320 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,354 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,368 subscribers15 August 2026 — 9,433 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 10 days, net +127. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,287–9,452 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 20:179,433+65
12 Aug 2026, 14:449,368+14
9 Aug 2026, 19:039,354+34
6 Aug 2026, 22:019,320+14
6 Aug 2026, 04:009,306no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:529,306first reading

Engagement

41 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.8%
avg views ÷ 9,433 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,340
39 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.45%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
41
of 41 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 38 of 39 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held41 (29 July 202617 August 2026)
Views total91,085
Reactions total1,301
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Aug 2026, 02:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
5,370
Videos
3,360
Links
9,160

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

1,265 reactions across 36 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍46837.0%
37429.6%
👏22017.4%
🔥574.51%
👌383.00%
🤬332.61%
❤‍🔥171.34%
💔141.11%
💯90.711%
😢70.553%
😱70.553%
🥰70.553%
😨60.474%
😡40.316%
🕊10.079%
😭10.079%
🙏10.079%
🤩10.079%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,301reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 39 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Zane_Ruz_Channel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 41 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 17 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 08:26 UTC≈1,020 views96 reactionsread 18 August 2026

❤️ «مردها به‌راحتی می‌گویند “من بچه می‌خواهم”، چون چیزی را از دست نمی‌دهند.» «بیایید یک بچه‌ی دیگر داشته باشیم»، مرد می‌گوید و منتظر می‌ماند که زن موافقت کند. برای او این تصمیم آسان است، چون هزینه‌اش را با بدن، سلامت، شغل یا آزادی خودش پرداخت نمی‌کند. 🔴اما یک زن هنگام داشتن فرزند چه چیزهایی را از دست می‌دهد؟ ۱. بدنش ۹ ماه بارداری، ترک‌های پوستی، پارگی‌ها. بخیه‌ها، جدایشِ عضلات شکم، بواسیر، واریس. ریزش مو. ضعیف ش

👏58👍158❤‍🔥4😢4🔥2😡2💯1

Signed Parastu.Farrokhi

16 Aug 2026, 15:46 UTC≈26,200 views17 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

❤️ دوره‌های آموزشی مدرسه فمینیستی زن‌روز: 🌸دوره «از شرم بدن تا پذیرش خود» ⬅️ با ارائه: چکامه شمسی |آغاز دوره: ۲ شهریورماه | ۴ جلسه |‌ دوشنبه و چهارشنبه‌ها ساعت ۱۸ 🌸دوره «تفکر انتقادی در معرفت‌شناسی فمینیستی» ⬅️با ارائه‌ دکتر سارا قزلباش | آغاز دوره: ۳ شهریورماه | ۴ جلسه | سه‌شنبه‌ها ساعت ۱۸ 🌸دوره «بدن زن و سینما» ⬅️ با ارائه طاهره جورکش | آغاز دوره: ۵ شهریورماه | ۶ جلسه |‌ پنجشنبه‌ها ساعت ۱۶ 🌸دوره باهمخوانی

👍113🔥2👏1

Signed Parastu.Farrokhi

16 Aug 2026, 08:24 UTC≈1,180 views25 reactionsread 18 August 2026

❤️ چرا فمینیست‌ها باید با مجازات اعدام مخالفت کنند؟ 🖍نویسنده: سیلویا فدریچی 🖊برگردان: طه رادمنش دلایل زیادی وجود دارد که چرا فمینیست‌ها باید با مجازات اعدام مخالفت کنند. برخی از این دلایل، از سیستمِ ارزشیِ ضمنی و نهفته در چند‌و‌چونِ کاربستِ فمینیسم سرچشمه می‌گیرند. منظورم تعهدی است که فمینیست‌ها باید به‌جهتِ ارتقای ارزش زندگی انسان‌ها در آن مشارکت داشته باشند، از رنجِ دیگران برای خود منبع رضایت نسازند، و تعهد متقاب

👍20🤬3👏1💔1

Signed Parastu.Farrokhi

15 Aug 2026, 17:42 UTC≈1,210 views12 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

❤️ مدرسه فمینیستی زن روز برگزار می‌کند: 📎دوره باهمخوانی کتاب هزارتوی کار خانگی ⏺️تسهیلگر: بهار فیض‌پور تأمل و گفت‌وگو درباره تجربه‌ها و دغدغه‌های زنان در خانه‌داری 📌سرفصل جلسات: 1️⃣جلسه اول: هم‌قدم شویم... آشنایی با هم، با ساختار کتاب، با روند و قواعد دوره 2️⃣جلسه دوم: «مشکلی هست!» فهم ضرورت هوشیاری در مواجهه با کار خانگی 3️⃣جلسه سوم: «سرمایه­‌هایی که حفظ می‌شود» آگاهی به نقش کلیدی کار خانگی در حفظ بقای جام

9👍1👏1🔥1

Signed Parastu.Farrokhi

15 Aug 2026, 15:13 UTC995 views16 reactionsread 18 August 2026
File

🎧 #فایل_صوتی ⬅️آزار آنلاین زنان 🎧 پادکست رادیو مرز روایت فاصله‌ای که آزار زنان در فضای آنلاین بین آنها و دیگران به وجود می‌آورد. #آزار_مجازی #آزار_آنلاین #آزار_اینترنتی #خشونت_دیجیتال #زنان_فضای_مجازی ❤️ @Zane_Ruz_Channel

13👍3

Signed Parastu.Farrokhi

15 Aug 2026, 07:41 UTC≈1,170 views48 reactionsread 18 August 2026

❤️ وقتی «مراقبت» به خشونت تبدیل می‌شود؛ روایت زنان از خشونت مامایی در اتاق‌های زایمان سازمان جهانی بهداشت سال‌هاست درباره بدرفتاری با زنان در دوران زایمان هشدار می‌دهد و آن را مسئله‌ای مرتبط با سلامت عمومی و حقوق بشر می‌داند. این بدرفتاری می‌تواند شامل خشونت جسمی و کلامی، تحقیر، تبعیض، نقض حریم خصوصی، بی‌توجهی، انجام اقدامات پزشکی بدون رضایت آگاهانه و محروم کردن زن از امکان تصمیم‌گیری درباره بدن خود باشد. (World He

👍369🤬2😭1

Signed Parastu.Farrokhi

14 Aug 2026, 08:50 UTC≈1,130 views14 reactionsread 18 August 2026

🎬 تمامی فیلم‌های فمینیستی کانال جامعه‌شناسی زن روز به همراه تحلیل آن‌ها به کانال زیر انتقال یافتند. 🔗 https://t.me/+pJ5JKb7UcYEyYmQ0

🔥113

Signed Parastu.Farrokhi

13 Aug 2026, 16:55 UTC≈1,640 views26 reactionsread 18 August 2026

🎬Tully 🎬تالی 🎭#تحلیل_فیلم فیلم تالی در سطح داستانی‌اش دربارهٔ «مارلو» است: مادری با سه فرزند که پس از زایمان سوم، زیر فشار بی‌خوابی، کار مراقبتی، توقعات خانوادگی و فرسودگی روانی قرار گرفته است. 🎞 فیلم بیش از آن‌که صرفاً روایتی از افسردگی پس از زایمان باشد، افشای یک تناقض بنیادین است: جامعه مادری را امری طبیعی، عاشقانه و غریزی معرفی می‌کند، اما کار مادی، جسمانی و روانیِ آن را نامرئی و خصوصی نگه می‌دارد. مارلو فقط

18👍4👏2🔥1🙏1

Signed Parastu.Farrokhi

12 Aug 2026, 07:43 UTC≈3,010 views110 reactionsread 18 August 2026

❤️ چرا کودک‌نما بودن زیبا شد؟ 🔴«کودک‌سازی» زنان آیا «زیبایی» زنانه در فرهنگ امروز به نوعی «کودک‌خواهی پنهان» (پدوفیلی) آغشته شده است؟ وقتی «سادگی» و «لطافت» به معنای «رفتار کودکانه» تعریف می‌شود، چه چیزی در ناخودآگاه جامعه در حال تخریب است؟ بیایید این نقاب زیبا را برداریم. فرهنگ مصرف‌گرا، با تزریق استانداردهای بصری کودکانه، در حال ساخت «زن ابدی نابالغ» است. ریشه‌ی این ماجرا در تمامی فرهنگ پدرسالار برای کنترل است؛

👏75👌1610😨4👍2💔2🥰1

Signed Parastu.Farrokhi

11 Aug 2026, 17:36 UTC≈1,720 views15 reactionsread 18 August 2026

❤️ دوره‌های مدرسه فمینیستی زن روز: 🌸 دوره «چالش‌های زنان در مسیر شغلی» ⬅️ با ارائه نازلی ابراهیمی |آغاز دوره: ۲۵ مردادماه | ۱۰ جلسه | یکشنبه‌ها ساعت ۱۸ 🌸 دوره «تفکر انتقادی در معرفت‌شناسی فمینیستی» ⬅️با ارائه‌ دکتر سارا قزلباش | آغاز دوره: ۳ شهریورماه | ۴ جلسه | سه‌شنبه‌ها ساعت ۱۸ 🌸 دوره «بدن زن و سینما» ⬅️ با ارائه طاهره جورکش | آغاز دوره: ۵ شهریورماه | ۶ جلسه |‌ پنجشنبه‌ها ساعت ۱۶ 🌸دوره «از شرم بدن تا پذیرش

11🥰2❤‍🔥1🔥1

Signed Parastu.Farrokhi

11 Aug 2026, 08:20 UTC≈2,050 views45 reactionsread 18 August 2026

❤️ آزمایش ارزش کارخانگی یک درمانگر از ۳۰ زن متأهل خواست برای یک هفته کارهای نامرئی خانه را انجام ندهند؛ شوهرهایشان فقط ۹ روز دوام آوردند. چرا درمانگر این پژوهش را انجام داد؟ در طول صدها جلسه مشاوره یک مشاور روابط الگوی مشابهی را می‌دید: زن‌ها بار کار ذهنی و شناختی نامرئی خانه را به دوش می‌کشیدند کاری که شوهرانشان واقعاً از وجود آن آگاه نبودند. نه فقط انجام دادن کارهای فیزیکی، بلکه کار پیش‌بینی‌کننده - یعنی دانستن

👏287👌7👍2💯1

Signed Parastu.Farrokhi

10 Aug 2026, 08:04 UTC≈1,680 views27 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

❤️ نمایش رقص کاروان و حضور زنان بر صحنه‌ی نمایش عمومی در ایران 🖍سوما نگه‌داری‌نیا سال ۱۹۴۶، بر صحنه‌ی یک تئاتر عمومی در تهران، سه زن به نام‌های نِستا رمضانی، هایده احمدزاده و ویلما پروتیوا برای اجرای رقصی با عنوان کاروان ظاهر شدند. این اجرا نقطه‌ی عطفی در تاریخ حضور زنان بر صحنه‌ی نمایش در ایران به شمار می‌آمد؛ چرا که تا پیش از آن، حضور زنانی از اقشار متوسط و تحصیل‌کرده در فضای عمومی تحت عنوان رقصنده، عملاً ممکن نب

👏20👍52

Signed Parastu.Farrokhi

Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @Zane_Ruz_Channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Zane_Ruz_Channel edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 56,368 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 21 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

آوای بوف | AVAYe BUF
@AVAYEBUF · 112,288
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“جامعه‌شناسی زن روز” (@Zane_Ruz_Channel), 9,433 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Zane_Ruz_Channel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.