Channel
@YouTube_Graam
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
149,174subscribers
+1,108 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001657838882 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @YouTube_Graam |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/YouTube_Graam |
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:34 | 149,174 | +88 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:35 | 149,086 | +13 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:21 | 149,073 | +69 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 22:11 | 149,004 | +145 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:54 | 148,859 | +110 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:36 | 148,749 | +270 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:00 | 148,479 | +413 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:45 | 148,066 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:37 | 148,066 | first reading |
69 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 69 (2 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 160,924 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 18:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
🔥 دیدن کیفیت از ادعا کردن قشنگتره! قبل از خرید کانفینگ، پینگ و سرعت باز شدن ویدیوها رو با اینترنت خودت تست کن. 🎁 کلمه « تست » رو برامون بفرست تا اشتراک رایگان بگیری: ➡️ @Etminannet_Support ➡️ @Etminannet_Support
📉 در موضوعی که فعالیت میکنید ویدئو هم ببینید!! وقتی شما درحال انجام دادن یه کاری هستید ، باید دائما خودتون رو پیشرفت بدید 👍 برای رشد و پیشرفت توی یوتیوب ، تماشا کردن ویدئوی رقیب ها میتونه کمک زیادی بهتون بکنه 💎 متاسفانه گهگاهی میبینم افرادی رو که وقتی این رو بهشون میگی ، میگن که چرا باید ویدئوهای رقیب ها رو نگاه کنم و براشون بازدید بزنم ؟! 💣 هیچوقت از این قبیل آدم ها نباشید ، چون شما با اینکه رقیب هستید اما میتون…
🎁 اگه میخوای یوتیوب رو استارت بزنی واتساپ پیام بده! و مشاوره رایگان بگیر 🪞 https://wa.me/989333200607 💵 الان بهترین زمانه شروع یوتیوبه
همه دروغ میگن ماهم دروغ بگیم ؟! 😐😂 نمیدونم چی بگم
💣 این دسته از یوتیوبرا موفق نمیشن؟! از اونجایی که شما خیلی روی تولید محتوای مستمر و منظم ، روی تمرکز کردن روی کار و... خیلی تاکید دارید یعنی کانال هایی که اینا رو رعایت نمیکنن قطعا موفق نمیشن ؟؟ این دسته از سوالات احتمالا برای شما هم پیش اومده ✅ 💎 قطعا نمیشه گفت که افرادی که این موارد رو رعایت نمیکنن توی یوتیوب موفق نمیشن چون خیلی از کانال ها بودن که بدون رعایت مردن خیلی از اصول به بازدیدهای بالا هم رسیدن اما دلیل…
🤩سوالی بود راجب هرچی از یوتیوب میتونید بپرسید: آیدی پشتیبانی: 👇 🆔 @Youtube_supp0rt 🆔 @Youtube_supp0rt
🔮 چند درصد احتمال داره توی یوتیوب شکست بخورم؟؟ ما اینجوری هستیم که قبل از شروع کردن کاری نگران شکست خوردن هستیم 📛 🛡 ترس از شکست خوردن خیلی وقتا باعث میشه افراد از انجام دادن کار منصرف بشن و دیگه سمتش نرن اما در اصل این شروع نکردنه از شکست بدتره!! اما چند درصد احتمال داره که یکی توی یوتیوب شکست بخوره ⁉️ ⏳ در مرحله اول از شکست خوردن ترسی نداشته باشید و در مرحله بعد بدونید که نمیشه برای شکست خوردن یه کانالی درصد مشخ…
🔥 دیدن کیفیت از ادعا کردن قشنگتره! قبل از خرید کانفینگ، پینگ و سرعت باز شدن ویدیوها رو با اینترنت خودت تست کن. 🎁 کلمه « تست » رو برامون بفرست تا اشتراک رایگان بگیری: ➡️ @Etminannet_Support ➡️ @Etminannet_Support
🎁 اگه میخوای یوتیوب رو استارت بزنی واتساپ پیام بده! و مشاوره رایگان بگیر 🪞 https://wa.me/989333200607 💵 الان بهترین زمانه شروع یوتیوبه
💯 چرا باید موضوعی که توش متخصص هستیم رو شروع کنیم؟؟ قطعا یکی از بهترین راه ها برای انتخاب ایده توی یوتیوب ، انتخاب بر اساس تخصصه 🔔 شما اگر تخصصی دارید که به درد یوتیوب میخوره حتما اون رو شروع کنید ⚠️ اما دلیل این حرف چیه؟؟ ✔️ شما وقتی توی موضوعی که تخصص دارید شروع به فعالیت کنید: 🔴 خیلی بهتر میتونید تولید محتوا کنید 🟡 همیشه ایده برای تولید محتوا دارید 🟢 کیفیت کارتون بالا خواهد بود وقتی که مخاطب ببینه شما توی موض…
🧨 ویدئوهای کوتاه چطوری به بازدیدهای بالا میرسن ؟! شما توی یوتیوب میتونید دو نوع ویدئو آپلود کنید که یکی از اونها شورت ویدئو هست 💡 اما الگوریتم شورت ویدئوها چطوریه و چجوری یه شورت ویدئو وایرال میشه ⁉️ 🔮 وایرال شدن شورت ویدئو تا حد خیلی زیادی به محتوای شما بستگی داره طوری که محتوای شما اونقدری جذاب باشه که مخاطب چندیم بار ویدئوتون رو تماشا کنه!! برای اینکه ویدئوی شما چندین بار دیده بشه راهکارهای مختلفی وجود داره که…
🧲 همین الان یوتیوبو شروع کن!! بسیاری از افراد همش برای شروع یوتیوب امروز و فردا میکنن 🧨 یوتیوب هر روز نسبت به روز قبل داره رقابتی تر میشه و رشد و پیشرفت کردن توش به مرور زمان سخت تر میشه 📰 🪫 اون فردایی که شما دنبالش هستید یا اون شنبهای که میخواید شروع کنید اگر میومد تا الان اومده بود ، این رو بدونید که اگر الان شروع نکنید درآینده هم شروع نمیکنید!! این حرف رو به خاطر بسپارید که : 📊 هر چقدر زودتر کانال یوتیوب …
Showing the 12 most recent of 69 posts we hold for @YouTube_Graam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 300,806 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“نیما نیکخواه | یوتیوب گرام 💎” (@YouTube_Graam), 149,174 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/YouTube_Graam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.