Both #UEFA Women’s Went Super Mega. Share Your results Guys back to back de rhe. Show Support👆
Signed 𝐘𝐨𝐔 𝐊𝐧𝐨𝐖 𝐖𝐡𝐎 𝐈 𝐀𝐦

Channel
@YouKnowWhoIAm_Official
On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
128subscribers
-53,760 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001613516713 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @YouKnowWhoIAm_Official |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 36 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 13 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/YouKnowWhoIAm_Official |
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 3 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @YouKnowWhoIAm_Official/509305 · this entry10 Aug 2026, 17:23 UTC | @Youknowcricke/32087712 Aug 2026, 22:26 UTC | 1.00 | 2 days |
| @YouKnowWhoIAm_Official/509344 · this entry13 Aug 2026, 14:28 UTC | @Youknowcricke/32102813 Aug 2026, 14:28 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @YouKnowWhoIAm_Official/509350 · this entry14 Aug 2026, 05:53 UTC | @Youknowcricke/32132114 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTC | 1.00 | 11 hours |
| @YouKnowWhoIAm_Official/509263 · this entry8 Aug 2026, 16:20 UTC | @Youknowcricke/32132814 Aug 2026, 17:58 UTC | 1.00 | 6 days |
| @YouKnowWhoIAm_Official/509387 · this entry15 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC | @Youknowcricke/32150015 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @YouKnowWhoIAm_Official/509388 · this entry15 Aug 2026, 10:30 UTC | @Youknowcricke/32158915 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC | 1.00 | 4.5 hours |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @Youknowcricke | 14 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 4.8 hours | this entry (13–1) |
| @BettingFevers | 8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 17 minutes | @BettingFevers (8–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 9 of the 9 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 279 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2026 to 24 September 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 3 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @YouKnowWhoIAm_Official — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 3 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 09:16 | 128 | -1 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 23:05 | 129 | +2 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 13:09 | 127 | -1 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 09:20 | 128 | -51,402 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 00:19 | 51,530 | -119 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 18:20 | 51,649 | -91 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 17:56 | 51,740 | -95 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 02:18 | 51,835 | -128 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 00:37 | 51,963 | -180 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 23:21 | 52,143 | -200 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 00:01 | 52,343 | -95 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:03 | 52,438 | -44 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:42 | 52,482 | -81 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:14 | 52,563 | -61 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:36 | 52,624 | -85 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 03:34 | 52,709 | -49 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:25 | 52,758 | -60 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:17 | 52,818 | -26 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:14 | 52,844 | -43 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:27 | 52,887 | first reading |
758 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 101 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 758 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 56 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,228 reactions across 399 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 429 | 34.9% | |
| 🥰 | 349 | 28.4% | |
| ❤🔥 | 159 | 12.9% | |
| 😍 | 125 | 10.2% | |
| 🔥 | 69 | 5.62% | |
| 👍 | 36 | 2.93% | |
| 💯 | 25 | 2.04% | |
| 🏆 | 8 | 0.651% | |
| 🙊 | 7 | 0.57% | |
| 🤩 | 7 | 0.57% | |
| 😈 | 5 | 0.407% | |
| 🙈 | 5 | 0.407% | |
| 💋 | 2 | 0.163% | |
| 😎 | 1 | 0.081% | |
| 🤗 | 1 | 0.081% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 411 of the 758 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,228 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 758 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Both #UEFA Women’s Went Super Mega. Share Your results Guys back to back de rhe. Show Support👆
Signed 𝐘𝐨𝐔 𝐊𝐧𝐨𝐖 𝐖𝐡𝐎 𝐈 𝐀𝐦
🔰2/2 Whole Telegram Mega in Women’s #UEFA Guys ⚽️🔥 ▪️All MiniGL Rank = 1😈 🔰Share Your Result👇 @ShotScreensHot_Bot ✨✅️
Signed 𝐘𝐨𝐔 𝐊𝐧𝐨𝐖 𝐖𝐡𝐎 𝐈 𝐀𝐦
🔰As Usual Women’s #UEFA Starts With Whole Telegram Mega Guys ⚽️🔥 ▪️All MiniGL Rank = 1😈 🔰Share Your Result👇 @ShotScreensHot_Bot ✨✅️
🥰1
Signed 𝐘𝐨𝐔 𝐊𝐧𝐨𝐖 𝐖𝐡𝐎 𝐈 𝐀𝐦
Share Everyone Guys👆
Signed 𝐘𝐨𝐔 𝐊𝐧𝐨𝐖 𝐖𝐡𝐎 𝐈 𝐀𝐦
🔰As Usual Women’s #UEFA Starts With Whole Telegram Mega Guys ⚽️🔥 ▪️All MiniGL Rank = 1😈 🔰Share Your Result👇 @ShotScreensHot_Bot ✨✅️
🥰1
Signed 𝐘𝐨𝐔 𝐊𝐧𝐨𝐖 𝐖𝐡𝐎 𝐈 𝐀𝐦
Full Mega aaa rha #UEFA Womens😈🔥
🥰2
Signed 𝐘𝐨𝐔 𝐊𝐧𝐨𝐖 𝐖𝐡𝐎 𝐈 𝐀𝐦
Now daily withdrawal limit is 5 Lakh No Payout charges and In bank working Hour withdrawal is almost instant. receive withdrawal with in 30 mintues. Entry Fees Same As D 11 Must Play On Daba Fantasy 🔥
❤1
Signed 𝚈𝙾𝚄 𝙺𝙽𝙾𝚆 𝙲𝚁𝙸𝙲𝙺𝙴𝚃 🔥
पहले की तरह बिना किसी रोक टोक के खेलना चाहते हो तो खेलों Daba Fantasy पे 🔥 ●No TDS No Tax No KYC🔥 ● No Competition All Sports✅ ●Withdrawal On Time 👍 App Link :- https://xyzdbawin.com/download/LOOTLO1000 https://xyzdbawin.com/download/LOOTLO1000 Reffer Code :- LOOTLO1000 (Get 100₹).
Signed 𝚈𝙾𝚄 𝙺𝙽𝙾𝚆 𝙲𝚁𝙸𝙲𝙺𝙴𝚃 🔥
Photo, posted without a caption
❤3😍1
Signed 𝐘𝐨𝐔 𝐊𝐧𝐨𝐖 𝐖𝐡𝐎 𝐈 𝐀𝐦
Reaction se bhardo. Women’s Match hai + UEFA⚽️🔥
😍8❤🔥5
Signed 𝐘𝐨𝐔 𝐊𝐧𝐨𝐖 𝐖𝐡𝐎 𝐈 𝐀𝐦
FANTASYWALA APP 🔽 https://fantasywala.online/download/LOOTLO100 https://fantasywala.online/download/LOOTLO100
❤11🥰4🔥2
Signed 𝐘𝐨𝐔 𝐊𝐧𝐨𝐖 𝐖𝐡𝐎 𝐈 𝐀𝐦
𝗯𝗮𝗰𝗸 𝘁𝗼 𝗯𝗮𝗰𝗸 𝗽𝗮𝘀𝘀 𝗱𝗶𝘆𝗮 𝗵𝗮𝗶💸🏅🥳🥳 𝗡𝗼𝗻 𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗽 𝗷𝗮𝗰𝗸𝗽𝗼𝘁 𝗰𝗵𝗲𝗰𝗸 𝗸𝗿𝗹𝗼 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘂𝗹𝘁𝘀😍 𝟮𝟬,𝟬𝟬𝟬+ 𝗯𝗼𝗼𝗞 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 Aane wale Wale Matches me Aur Kamaenge Deposit Krlo Sab😍🔥 💠Register in 1WIN 👉🏽👉🏽👉🏽https://1win.in/#7bjk PROMO CODE: BETTINGFEVER (🤏Tap to Copy).
Signed 𝚈𝙾𝚄 𝙺𝙽𝙾𝚆 𝙲𝚁𝙸𝙲𝙺𝙴𝚃 🔥
Showing the 12 most recent of 758 posts we hold for @YouKnowWhoIAm_Official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@YouKnowWhoIAm_Official edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 11 posts on @YouKnowWhoIAm_Official as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Ready For CWL……………..?⚽️🔥
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Wait hojayega na sabse 3-4 din football ke liye……….?🔥
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 758 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 24 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 20 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“You Know Who I Am” (@YouKnowWhoIAm_Official), 128 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/YouKnowWhoIAm_Official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.