Kharab Raha Kal Ka Match 🙏 The Hundred Mai 22 / 31 Pass 👍 Kal Se CPL Aur TNPL Par Focus Karenge 😍😍

Channel
Anurag Dwivedi 🏏
@AnuragxCricket
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,081,594subscribers
-26,374 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001296541353 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AnuragxCricket |
| Description | YouTuber : Cricket Content Creator🙌 @ApkaApnaAnurag Cricket Stats and Analysis. All Content for Informational and Educational Purpose only. No Guarantee, No Promotion of Gambling, Play responsibly |
| Created | 10 March 2021 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AnuragxCricket |
Topic
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:58 | 2,081,594 | -3,805 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:55 | 2,085,399 | -3,519 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:25 | 2,088,918 | -3,077 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:44 | 2,091,995 | -2,491 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:52 | 2,094,486 | -2,552 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:48 | 2,097,038 | -2,916 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:37 | 2,099,954 | -2,885 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:50 | 2,102,839 | -2,721 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:51 | 2,105,560 | -2,408 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:15 | 2,107,968 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:06 | 2,107,968 | first reading |
Engagement
56 posts held, back to 10 March 2021 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 1,967 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.23%
- avg views ÷ 2,081,594 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 67,100
- 19 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 19
- of 56 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 56 (10 March 2021 – 17 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,275,500 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 17 Aug 2026, 22:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 12
- Videos
- 29
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 53s
- Average length
- 11s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 22 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days: a typical post has already reached 29.1% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 54.8% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 75,600 views — 3.63% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 84,200).
| Post | Readings | Latest reading | Curve | 24h reach | Half of last-observed views by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /7304416 Aug 2026, 16:54 UTC | 277 minutes – 24 hours old | 68,600 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 24,987 interp. → 3.0 hours: 32,905 interp. → 6.0 hours: 35,958 interp. → 12 hours: 48,743 interp. → 24 hours: 68,600still climbing at last reading | 68,600measured | 4.4 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /7304316 Aug 2026, 16:51 UTC | 279 minutes – 24 hours old | 70,800 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 28,362 interp. → 3.0 hours: 36,298 interp. → 6.0 hours: 39,232 interp. → 12 hours: 51,465 interp. → 24 hours: 70,800still climbing at last reading | 70,800measured | 2.5 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /7304215 Aug 2026, 14:15 UTC | 295 minutes – 23 hours old | 52,300 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 17,338 interp. → 3.0 hours: 26,500 → 6.0 hours: 31,900 → 12 hours: 35,600 → 24 hours: 52,300still climbing at last reading | 52,300measured | 2.8 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /7304114 Aug 2026, 21:08 UTC | 457 minutes – 24 hours old | 60,500 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 3,810 interp. → 3.0 hours: 8,510 → 6.0 hours: 18,500 → 12 hours: 33,000 → 24 hours: 60,500still climbing at last reading | 60,500measured | 10 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /7304014 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC | 4514 minutes – 24 hours old | 72,600 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 26,499 interp. → 3.0 hours: 35,300 → 6.0 hours: 39,300 → 12 hours: 50,200 → 24 hours: 72,600still climbing at last reading | 72,600measured | 3.7 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /7303914 Aug 2026, 14:47 UTC | 4526 minutes – 24 hours old | 75,600 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 21,600 → 3.0 hours: 44,800 → 6.0 hours: 51,100 → 12 hours: 58,700 → 24 hours: 75,600still climbing at last reading | 75,600measured | 2.2 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /7303813 Aug 2026, 12:13 UTC | 462 minutes – 24 hours old | 52,200 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 15,351 interp. → 3.0 hours: 27,423 interp. → 6.0 hours: 36,000 → 12 hours: 39,800 → 24 hours: 52,200still climbing at last reading | 52,200measured | 2.7 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /7303712 Aug 2026, 09:11 UTC | 109 minutes – 5.2 hours old | 32,000 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 12,296 interp. → 3.0 hours: 22,700still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 1.5 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed viewsis the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Recent posts
Video message, posted without a caption
The Hundred Final Match Trent Will Win 💛🔥 Target Defend Hoga 😎
TNPL MATCH 20 Kovai Will Win 🔥😎 Target Defend Hoga 👍
The Hundred Mai Aur Ek Pass 🥳 22/30 Matches Pass in The Hundred 👏
The Hundred Eliminator Match Manchester Will Win ❤️🔥 Target Defend Hoga 😎
TNPL MATCH 19 Madurai Panthers Will Win 🔥👏 Target Chase Hoga 😎
TNPL MATCH 16 Kovai Kings Will Win 🔥😍 Target Defend Hoga 😎
ये देखो ये हैं 6 ऐसे FEATURES जो आपको सिर्फ यहाँ मिलेंगे🤝🔥 देखो क्यूँ Cricway है बेस्ट Site इस Cricket Trading की दुनिया में 😡🔥 6 Reasons to Shift on Cricway🤝📣 📌0% ACCOUNT FREEEZ 📌FASTEST DEPOSIT / WITHDRAWAL 📌REGULAR LOSSBACK OFFERS 📌700+ LIVE GAMES 📌VIP Branch ID STARTS with 2000 📌1 TAP LOSSCUT-CASHOUT-SPEEDCASH✅ VIP Branch ( Min ID 2000) https://wa.link/cricwayiovip https://wa.link/cricwayiovip ROYAL Branch …
Kharab Raha Ye Waala Match , 2 Din Ka Break Le Raha Huin 🙏 Thoda Mind Fresh Kar Leta Huin 🙌
The Hundred Match 29 Trent Will Win 💛🔥 Target Defend Hoga 😎
Jackpot Nahi Ban Paya Match 😒 Kharab Raha Din 🙏 Kal Milte Hai 🙌 The Hundred Score 20/28 Pass 👍
Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @AnuragxCricket. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 508,118 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@SomeshThakreTg · 417,841#1
@cricinformer · 279,341#2
@AakashChopraOfficial · 186,901#3
@bestpick · 91,591#4
@billabombay · 67,017#5
@Rishanktips · 81,085#6
@fantasyteammakerskills · 6,879#7
@TheMarsTossOriginal · 36,641#8
@deathovers33 · 10,036#9
@Devendra89Yadav · 9,025#10
@DTLLEAKER_ORIGINAL · 72,436#11
@YouKnowWhoIAm_Official · 53,304#12
@Tanay100 · 104,683#13
@Bk_Roy_vipin_Singh · 211,258#14
@sfgfamily · 79,766#15
@velaniparthofficial · 77,356#16
@FantasyLossCover · 131,892#17
@RANBIRROYOFFICE · 2,091,295#18
@aman123456778 · 4,601#19
@KINGTOSSLINE111 · 35,618#20
@domesticlogic · 2,875#21
@vsgline2 · 140,533#22
@CRICDJ · 20,529#23
@Team_Six_T6 · 5,042#24
@premiumteamsleak · 7,617#25
@dhonifantasysports · 7,196#26
@ShivamSporting · 6,449 (as read 8 August 2026)#27
@Mahakal_Family_Mini_GL_King_Join · 49,690#28
@stoningstar29 · 6,931#29
@BOMBAYMARKETLOADOFFICIAL · 94,970#30
@souravsamajik84 · 34,731#31
@mcpyoutube · 50,725#32
@Mousabos112 · 6,177 (as read 8 August 2026)#33
@BINDASHRKG91 · 26,784#34
@Marketload57 · 8,914#35
@UKMWIM · 47,909#36
@khatridxb · 84,205#37
@fantasygram7 · 54,052#38
@iamvsg · 1,272,564#39
@dogs · 7,462,388#40
@hamster_kombat · 21,958,741#41
@tomarket_ai · 7,164,714#42
@CryptoKingKeyur · 714,539#43
@Cats_housewtf · 8,578,573#44
@Bitget_Wallet_Announcement · 4,268,528#45
@mastercryptohq · 276,971#46
@next10xgem1 · 338,845#47
@Onmaastaywithme · 4,751 (as read 8 August 2026)#48
@cryptokanishkchaudharypremium · 146,138#49
@MONEY_MAKER_REAL_ORIGINAL · 55,872#50
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@bestpick · 91,591
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 17 August 2026
@cricketkabosshu · 94,207
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 16 August 2026
@rajan_ds · 123,021
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 13 August 2026
@AakashChopraOfficial · 186,901
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 11 August 2026
@cricinformer · 279,341
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 10 August 2026
@SomeshThakreTg · 417,841
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 10 August 2026
@FBuzz11 · 90,136
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 17 August 2026
@pawan_jaipur_satish_ipl · 104,468
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 15 August 2026
@FantasyLossCover · 131,892
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 13 August 2026
@Tanay100 · 104,683
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 15 August 2026
@sherajat · 149,978
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 15 August 2026
@vsgline2 · 140,533
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 13 August 2026
@DeepakTips11 · 113,683
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 15 August 2026
@Ranbirroydubai · 1,144,564
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 32 here — alongside 31 others — read 8 August 2026
@RANBIRROYOFFICE · 2,091,295
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 34 here — alongside 33 others — read 8 August 2026
@Bk_Roy_vipin_Singh · 211,258
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 11 August 2026
@smiriti_g · 93,972
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 34 here — alongside 33 others — read 16 August 2026
@Monukumarsingh · 99,569
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 15 August 2026
@harman_preet_kaur1 · 98,121
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 16 August 2026
@ostlinki2 · 322,266
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 34 here — alongside 33 others — read 15 August 2026
@BIG_BASH_LEAGUE_BBL_2024 · 148,621
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 12 August 2026
@iamvsg · 1,272,564
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 8 August 2026
@fastwin_app · 323,654
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 25 here — alongside 24 others — read 10 August 2026
@goldminechannel · 110,481
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 50 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Anurag Dwivedi 🏏” (@AnuragxCricket), 2,081,594 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AnuragxCricket.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.