Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

PriMe LeAk BaBa

@PRIMELEAKERBABA

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

18,328subscribers

+10,201 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001343869089
TypeChannel
Username@PRIMELEAKERBABA
DescriptionThis channel strictly adheres to the PROGA 2025 guidelines. 𝗥𝗶𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗯𝗵 𝗥𝗮𝗻𝗮 𝗕𝗼𝗼𝗸 https://t.me/+_7MRm6dGxA1jYzk1 𝗕𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗕𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗦𝗶𝘁𝗲 BETBHAI.GAME 𝗚𝘂𝗮𝗿𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗲𝗱 𝗕𝘆 𝗠𝗲 ✅ Any Query msg @kohli786_bot
Created9 September 2020measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/PRIMELEAKERBABA

Growth

7,79718,32813,062.56 August 2026 — 8,127 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,127 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,111 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,797 subscribers13 August 2026 — 18,328 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net +10,201. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,217–19,908 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 02:3418,328+10,531
10 Aug 2026, 12:187,797-314
7 Aug 2026, 08:238,111-16
6 Aug 2026, 23:158,127no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:078,127first reading

Engagement

169 posts held, back to 9 September 2020the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.35%
avg views ÷ 18,328 subscribers
Avg views / post
248
168 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.801%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
168
of 169 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 66 of 168 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held169 (9 September 202013 August 2026)
Views total41,721
Reactions total124
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 14:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
24
Links
11

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

124 reactions across 62 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7862.9%
😍2721.8%
❤‍🔥97.26%
🥰64.84%
💘43.23%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 66 of the 169 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 124reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 169 most recent posts we hold, published 9 September 2020 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 12:39 UTC182 viewsread 13 August 2026

❤️❤️ Stay connected with us! Say ‘Hi’ on our bot @kohli786_bot 😀💯 🚫 join our telegram backup channel for safety purpose ✅ 👇👇 https://t.me/+VGoSeHDZt8FjZmJl https://t.me/+VGoSeHDZt8FjZmJl

13 Aug 2026, 12:24 UTC180 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @kohlivibePhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

😍3

13 Aug 2026, 12:14 UTC162 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @kohlivibePhoto

💘➡️TEAM WILL COME ONLY FOR THIS APP 💰🔥✅✅ https://dabafantasy.com/download/Team4free https://dabafantasy.com/download/Team4free 📣🚨 Referral Code - TEAM4FREE 💌 (Must use referral code always 24×7hrs instant support + join my 😋😎👑Private channel access after sign-up + deposit 🔥@kohli786_bot🫣😄)

13 Aug 2026, 11:38 UTC305 viewsread 13 August 2026

Ghar Baithe Baithe Duniya Ka Har Banda Kama Raha Hai Paisa Rishabh Rana Book Pe Khelkar...🤑 𝙎𝙚𝙡𝙛 𝙎𝙞𝙩𝙚➡️ BETBHAI.GAME Aap Bhi Karo Kamana Start Id Banao...

13 Aug 2026, 11:38 UTC318 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🎯 Aaj Ka Match Hoga SHANDAAR Aur Har Exclusive Bet Milegi Sirf BETBHAI.GAME Par: 𝐑𝐈𝐒𝐇𝐀𝐁𝐇 𝐑𝐀𝐍𝐀 𝙇𝘼𝙐𝙉𝘾𝙃𝙀𝘿 𝙉𝙀𝙒 𝙒𝙀𝘽𝙎𝙄𝙏𝙀 BETBHAI.GAME – India Most Trusted Gaming Platform📱 ✅ Fast Performance Easy Access ✅ Interactive User Interface ✅ More Safe & Secure In App ✅ Notification Of Every Match ✅ Open ID Directly Without Logging In Again & Again ✅ Withdrawal 10-15 Mints Mein ➡️No Bank Freezing ✔️ ➡️24×7 Customer Support ✔️ ➡️

Showing the 12 most recent of 169 posts we hold for @PRIMELEAKERBABA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

CricInformer
@cricinformer · 280,557
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 10 August 2026
Somesh Thakre
@SomeshThakreTg · 420,505
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PriMe LeAk BaBa” (@PRIMELEAKERBABA), 18,328 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PRIMELEAKERBABA.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.